Divided We Stand

Yesterday I said I'd offer up some fuller thoughts on Kevin Drums notion that Democrats actually are in agreement about national security matters. One slight problem with Kevin's view, I think, is that it comes with the proviso that only "if you take out, say, the Chomsky wing on the left and the Lieberman wing on the right," then you find that "there's a surprising amount that the rest of us agree on." In part it gets a little tautological to say that if you take a political movement, then remove its dissident elements, what you're left with is unity. That aside, though, there is something to Kevin's notion. But also, I think, something wrong with it.

The unity he's talking about has been purchased at the price of a great deal of vagueness. Now there's always going to be vagueness coming from politicians who have an understandable desire to avoid getting themselves pinned down. Which is fine, politics is politics. But if you watch the community of non-politicians in the progressive camp, you'll find people who do articulate more specific ideas. And while either set of ideas can be fitted into the same overarching framework of platitutdes, they're genuinely different ideas. I thought one useful way of exploring this might be for me to talk a little bit about Peter Beinart's book, The Good Fight. There are a few reasons for this. One is simply that the book took a lot of criticism from bloggers for what I think were sort of the wrong reasons. Another is that my book is going to be on a similar sort of subject, but is going to reach substantially different conclusions. Last, Beinart's a good case precisely because he's fully disavowed the Iraq War, but I think still falls on the "hawk" side of an enduring divide within mainstream liberalism so looking at his ideas is a good way of showing that disagreement isn't just disagreement about Iraq.

On the relatively specific issue of combatting the al-Qaeda movement, the crux of the issue is this. Beinart, like many most progressives who found themselves in the pro-invasion camp, has developed a certain degree of skepticism about the utility of military force in coping with the problem. This is all to the good. He retains, however, a belief in the basic view of the problem that drove support for the invasion of Iraq. Specifically, he continues to believe that America's strategy toward confronting the al-Qaeda movement should be centered around trying to bring about large-scale socio-political transformation of the Islamic world. This is a view that some people who were never believers in the Iraq War also maintain in one form or another. Shadi Hamid's recent article for The American Prospect Online qualifies, I would say.

On this view, the Muslim world is afflicted by a kind of cultural sickness that, thanks to globalization, immigration, and the open nature of western societies is capable of infecting us. To cope with the threat we need to act aggressively to treat the patient. This could take the form of military action (unilateral or otherwise) or "transformational diplomacy," efforts to fund certain groups here or there, big Marshall Plan-style funding campaigns, or any number of other things.

Basically, I would dispute that analysis and adopt an analysis closer to the consensus I saw on view at an enlightening panel discussion I attended this morning.

On my view, the central problem vis-a-vis the United States and the Muslim world is the enduring legacy of imperialism. There are a number of modalities to this. The continuing American occupation of Iraq is one. The Israeli occupation of Arab lands is another. The secessionist conflicts in Kashmir, Chechnya, and the Philipines also count. So does the American habit of locating military bases in Arab countries with the consent of the local monarchs (typically installed by retreating British colonial authorities) but against the will of the local population. All this, in turn, relates in a broad sense to American efforts to micromanage the balance of power in the Persian Gulf region in increasingly intrusive ways.

Mitigating the threat posed by the al-Qaeda movement, on this view, requires us to wind down the various concrete political conflicts that al-Qaeda stitches together into a generic clash of civilizations narrative. It also requires us not to transform our Arab allies into democracies, but to broadly disentangle ourselves from our perceived role as regional string-pullers and the power behind the throne.

Beinart, conveniently enough, does me the favor of labeling what he regards as the left-deviationists within the Democratic camp as the "anti-imperialist" faction of progressive politics. I think it's a good label, since "imperialism" is precisely the label I'd like to pin on folks on the other side. Unfortunately, Beinart seems to see a fairly crude sort of isolationism as the only viable alternative to imperialism. I would say that liberals have at our disposal an appealing third option -- liberalism -- the continuing effort to slowly-but-surely construct a liberal order in which international affairs are increasingly governed through institutions.

In his book, Beinart -- like Francis Fukuyama coming at the problem from a different direction in his book -- has engaged in a kind of rediscovery of institutions. But he sees the value of institutions as overwhelmingly instrumental. They help grant American actions legitimacy, or perhaps the appearance of legitimacy, which, in practice, turns out to be important. This drives what I would characterize as an undue level of interest in institutional proliferation, what Fukuyama calls multi-multilateralism. What this amounts to, I think, is a desire to open up as many opportunities as possible for forum shopping so that the United States can appear to have subordinated its will to rule-governed institutional processes while, in fact, retaining the substance of unilateral hegemony.

That's the attitude I called "smarter, more effective imperialism" with reference to Nancy Soderbergh. And I think it really is smarter and, for a while, would genuinely prove more effective than the extraordinary crudeness of Bush's conduct of the country's affairs. It would be better to see the country move to that kind of position. I don't, however, think that those sort of policies will genuinely solve the problem or provide a long-term basis for peace, prosperity, and security.

I also don't think a political argument that's predominantly about techniques is especially promising. From moment one, you essentially wind up too thick in the weeds for voters to listen to what you're saying or care about what you're trying to do. The upshot of that is going to be a GOP advantage simply because they have a generic edge on national security issues and have for a long time. A bigger, broader argument about vision and principle would, by contrast, be hard to win. But I think it would at least be possible. And it would also serve the country better.

Comments

Can you please clarify how your viewpoint is different than Pat Buchanan's? Or is it the same?

Posted by: niraj on September 8, 2006 02:19 PM

Niraj: "Unfortunately, Beinart seems to see a fairly crude sort of isolationism as the only viable alternative to imperialism. I would say that liberals have at our disposal an appealing third option -- liberalism -- the continuing effort to slowly-but-surely construct a liberal order in which international affairs are increasingly governed through institutions."

Posted by: David Weman on September 8, 2006 02:48 PM

I think Wes Clark had a piece in the Washington Monthly on the difficulties that the US and the UK had as former and present imperial powers in the Middle East, comparing them in fact to the USSR in Eastern Europe. Plus you will want to look at Anatol Lieven's book America Right or Wrong.

More important: Your sketch here is clarifyingly negative but in positive terms your suggestion is only procedural: the US should not be imperialist, but should involve itself in governing international affairs through institutions. But what outcome are you proposing for those military bases, US oil interests (not on your list, but I assume not neglected in your book), Chechnya, Israeli occupation of Arab lands and so forth? Are the Arabs/Islamic world etc going to be able to use these institutions to remove US oil interests, remove military bases, remove all the Israeli settlers on the land conquered in 1967 including around Jerusalem etc? Or are they not? And if they can't, why will be institutions be acceptable? Wont they be another Baghdad Pact?

Posted by: otto on September 8, 2006 02:51 PM

It looks to me to be precisely the opposite of Pat Buchanan's, niraj. Pat is an isolationist. Instead, Matthew seems to be in favor of world government. Or at least that's what I take from this.

Matthew likes multilateral institutions. OK. But he doesn't like multiple small multilateral institutions that the US can forum shop and dominate. (Perhaps this is what led to yesterday's post about Argenitina and the IMF?) So what's the alternative? One big multilateral institution that the US can't dominate. Or am I missing something?

Posted by: Al on September 8, 2006 02:53 PM

Its nice to see the debate moving from the woeful "benign hegemon" that some on the left are all too pleased to characterize the US as and locate the real problem being the imperial legacy. My only problem, and this is a pretty big one, is the idea that the global spread of liberalism somehow serves as a bulwark against neo-imperialism.

Sure its easy to label this position as one of the "dissident left," but those supposedly against US hegemony have done a less than spectacular job of arguing exactly how liberalism, multi-lateralism etc. actually counteracts hegemonization rather than serving as a patina for further US imperial aggression.

Posted by: Yair on September 8, 2006 03:09 PM

Gawd help me. If your summary of Beinart as favoring "smarter, more effective imperialism" is correct, then he's where I am. That can't be good. Your book better be rigorous and convincing, Yglesias.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 8, 2006 03:10 PM

Geez--so it's cowboy unilateralism or world federalism, is it? America as Dirty Harry or as Gulliver? I think Matt's book will have a slightly longer word count than that. And I think--not to be a spoiler or anything--that it might involve developing a frame for thinking about when, how, and how not to engage in international institution-building. I bet it will also wrestle with the reality that you can't just talk the talk (see, inter alia, Bush 43's unhinged second inaugural address)--you have to figure out how to walk the walk. These--and a way to talk about a liberal international order in ways that effectively communicate its deep prudential wisdom to an electorate in love with action figures--are desperately needed ideas.

Posted by: Ben on September 8, 2006 03:22 PM

Let's please use the "i" word. I hate to think of the USA as an empire, but lordamitey, we sure act like one. And again, not in the "everything America does is bad" sense, but in the literal sense of having bases all around the world. I don't think these bases are worth shit, and they sure piss of the locals (OBL, for instance) plenty. It still takes weeks to deploy the serious fighting forces. The bases are just expensive outposts. We have aircraft carrier groups,etc. We should have zeros bases in the middle east. If Iran invades Iraq or Iraq invades Kuwait again, we can always come back. In those cases we'd be welcomed.

Seriously, the evildoers don't hate our freedom, etc. They just want us the fuck out. Let's just go.

Posted by: Chris on September 8, 2006 03:31 PM

Matt will answer for himself. But the one difference that stands out for me the emphasis on "the continuing effort to slowly-but-surely construct a liberal order in which international affairs are increasingly governed through institutions." This is no part of Buchanan's view of the world.

Posted by: Dan Kervick on September 8, 2006 03:35 PM

Off-topic RSS coment,

Matt, now that you've switched to a snippet-only RSS feed it would be nice if the link on the feed would take you to the story on the front page instead of the permalink with the comments, that way readers can click on the story and then read up from there for the other posts, instead of having to go back and forth from the RSS reader for each post. This is how Josh does it at talkingpointsmemo.com and it's a lot more convenient. OTOH, I guess you get more pageviews this way, but at the expense of my convenince :-P

Posted by: Miguel on September 8, 2006 03:41 PM

To much of the world, the US is the imperial villain. Sadly, isolationalism is the only course for the short term. Once Bush is out of office, and the Americans competently help those in need after natural disasters, the world community might be willing to listen to what we say.

Posted by: Mal on September 8, 2006 03:44 PM

At some level, America has been an empire for a while now, whether we like it or not. And compared to anything in the past, we've been a pretty darn good empire as well, even with all the corruption that came along with the power.

But that can't and won't last forever. I think one thing everyone needs to realize is the U.S. will not be the king of the hill forever. Even if we stay as rich as we've been, the rest of the world is (and should!) catch up. But we do have still have overwhelming power and influence for the time being, even with Bush pissing so much of it away. We have the ability to largely determine what the world will look like 100 years from now, after our own influence has largely gone away. Assuming PAX America is not a possibility going forward much longer, what world do we want to live in?

My #1 biggest issue with Bush is he is creating a world of cowboys and gunfights, where might makes right while simultaneously weakening our power to change directions.

Posted by: Mark on September 8, 2006 04:03 PM

Politically, I think the Yglesias platform would likely be a tough sell, because it plays into the worst stereotypes people already have about liberals… any Democratic politician who runs on a foreign policy based around anti-imperialist multilateralism will instantly be caricatured as a cut and run, blame America first wimp who cares more about placating the French then protecting Americans. So at the very least, those ideas will need to be framed a little differently.

On the substance, I don’t think there’s a single cause to our problems, or a single solution. The legacy of imperialism is a causal factor, but it’s not the only one. Similarly, there’s no either/or choice between trying to end the conflicts in Palestine/Kashmir/Chechnya, strengthening multilateral institutions, and engaging in transformational diplomacy. We should be doing all of them.

Posted by: RC on September 8, 2006 04:19 PM

And then there's the oil situation. Will your book touch on this. and/or on other material aspects (or driving forces) of US imperialism?

Posted by: mary on September 8, 2006 04:22 PM

If you define the "the Lieberman right" as people who share Lieberman's POLICY choices but not necessarily his pro-Bush rhetoric, then a majority of the party's Congressional delegation is in the Lieberman right.

Posted by: digamma on September 8, 2006 06:22 PM

There's a reason that American imperialism is disliked: any imperialist is going to be disliked. And there's a reason for that state of affairs that cannot be finessed away by erudite phraseology or convincing "frame". Imperialists of the noblest mettle become less noble over time. The fleecing of the US gov't and the Iraqis by the CPA during the sway of the CPA showed that Americans just skipped the part about becoming "less noble over time" and just dipped right into the ignoble stuff from the get go. Paging Lord Acton!

All the effort to try to work up good reasons for doing potentially ignoble things and hoping for the best are going to turn out badly. The best thing to do is going to remain the best thing to do: only use force when you've got no other choice.

Posted by: Jeffrey Davis on September 8, 2006 06:49 PM

I hope that you will spend a little time describing the mechanism by which international institutions are going to achieve the outcomes you want in the Middle East or elsewhere. For example, the WTO offers a sort of tit-for-tat linkage between importers and exporters where exporters know that if they don't restrain importers wanting protection, exports will suffer. It's that linkage mechanism, not the fact that there's a secretariat and a building in Geneva (?) which is what drives the usefulness of the WTO. You need to think of the underlying mechanism in relation to the Middle East, and then put, as it were, an institution on top of it.

Posted by: otto on September 8, 2006 07:00 PM

What is this total nonsense about "isolationism"? Things are so bad in our public discourse that anyone who thinks we should stop killing foreigners is an "isolationist". No one is saying you can't visit other countries, or trade with them, or marry attractive foreign women, or translate foreign books, or spend junior year abroad in Prague, or whatever you want to do really. In fact, we might find that once we stopped bombing other countries they would be more, not welcoming to us. There are dozens of countries now that an American can't visit safely because of our foreign policy, and American embassies everywhere are walled-off fortresses, isolated from the cities they are located in. Perhaps that's the real "isolationism".

Posted by: MQ on September 8, 2006 07:12 PM

Umm, that should read "more, not less, welcoming to us".

Posted by: MQ on September 8, 2006 07:14 PM

Sounds to me that Matthew is drifting towards a kind of "American unexceptionalism." Some dimensions of world life require multilateral institutions. Some are best left to sovereign nation states pursuing self-interest. But wherever you draw that line for France or Russia, you draw that same line for the US. So far I like it.

The "legacy of imperialism" meme though, sounds a lot like post-colonial dictatorships justifying themselves on the basis of the past. It is a lot like the legacy of Tsarism or capitalism in Soviet discourse. Sure, history leaves us with problems (botched partitions, botched unifications).

But the real problem with the project to transform the Muslim world may not be about the past, but the present. Maybe Muslims don't want to be transformed. Sure, they will doubtless imitate some aspects of Western culture, technology and possibly even economic and political institutions. But they are unlikely to see it as the picture of their own future -- to the extent they do, they will tend to become angry and frightened, since they will see this prospect as a dystopian one.

Pat Buchanan is basically right this far: coercively transforming the Muslim world is not in the West's interests, nor is it moral, nor is it likely to work.

Posted by: Pithlord on September 8, 2006 07:21 PM

Exactly, Pithlord. Buchanan's got it.

Posted by: MQ on September 8, 2006 07:26 PM

Watch it Pithlord. David Brooks tried arguing that maybe Arabs or Muslims didn't want to live under democracy after all, and Matthew said that meant Brooks was calling Arabs and Muslims "subhuman".

Posted by: Al on September 8, 2006 07:47 PM

Gosh I don't see the legacy of imperialism and the cultural sickness or pathology views as excluding each other. It could even be that the truth of the former is a contributing cause to the truth of the latter. Still I'm with MY's liberal conclusion if I've understood it properly: our interests, by which I mean the citizens of the US, and citizens of other countries in the world are best served by ' the continuing effort to slowly-but-surely construct a liberal order in which international affairs are increasingly governed through institutions [that promote peace, international cooperation and, in unglamorous ways, e.g., more by creating an attractive example than by intervention, help spread democratic valuse]' i.e., something like what the US as a founding member of the UN and a signatory to many treaties had repeatedly committed itself before the Bush might makes right era.

Posted by: J on September 8, 2006 08:32 PM

What is this total nonsense about "isolationism"? Things are so bad in our public discourse that anyone who thinks we should stop killing foreigners is an "isolationist".

MQ is precisely right. Calling a move away from the prodigal use of lethal military force "isolationism" is playing into rhetorical hands of the hawks. They want to frighten Americans into thinking that the only alternative to militarism and aggressive overseas intervention is locking ourselves away in our bedrooms like some neurotic, latter-day Emily Dickensons. They euphemistically call their own policy one of "engagement".

That's a crazy perspective. It is rather the skeptics about the current aggressive interventionist posture who favor a healthy engagement with the world. There are many perfectly normal and successful countries in the world, who relate in an open and constructive manner with other countries in the world, and yet who do not have their soldiers "engaged" in blowing up things in multiple foreign lands.

Rather than letting the hawks say that their opponents favor "isolationism," why don't we say instead that the hawks favor "intrusionismism"? Rather than letting them get away with calling their preferred course "engagement," why don't we say instead that they are suffering from "derangement"?

Posted by: Dan Kervick on September 8, 2006 08:40 PM

Any policy that tells Americans they don't have more privileges than other nations, especially nations full of non-white people, will be overwhelmingly rejected by the voters for the rest of my lifetime. I'm 57.
I'd be willing to bet it will be overwhelmingly rejected by the voters for the rest of your lifetime, too, Matt, and I know you're some younger than me.
Only military defeat (unlikely) or economic catastrophe (more likely) that IMPOSES a less imperial and belligerent foreign policy on this nation will alter that fundamental truth/

Posted by: Michael Gee on September 9, 2006 11:40 AM

Policywise, I agree with Matt more than I expected to.

Politically, I think that the main reason s Democrats lose are the Republican penetration of the media, the dynamite Republican political machine (which controls pork distribution and most policy-making), and the Republican alternate media (think tanks and money-losing fringe publications). These will be the ones who label Democrats as hippie pacifist cowards, and unless Democrats have a counterforce in place, we will lose.

The Republican political apparatchiks are happy to work with sympathetic members of the military-intelligence establishment (excluding the CIA these days), and militarism is part of the Republican campaign mix. Between the two, America's permanent mobilization (since 1941) has been bent in a very unfavorable direction, but even quite recently liberal internationalists have played an only slightly different game (e.g., Bzrezinski still defends US support of Islamofascism [/irony] in the Afghan-Soviet War).

The military-intelligence complex is a major interest group (3% of GDP? 5%), and they're very media-savvy and politically astute. Fighting them will be a big job. Fortunately, they're not united against us, but a hawk will always have an easier time finding partners there than anyone describable as a dove. (Military/intelligence people, as individuals, often use politics and political connections to advance their personal careers at the expense of their competitors in the biz, which leads to special problems.)

[This post partially transferred from a dead thread]

Posted by: John Emerson on September 9, 2006 12:45 PM

I'm actually sort of surprised to hear your suggestion, Matt.

I'm all in favor of international intstitutions in a theoretical sense, I agree with not only a less unilateral, but a less heavy-handed and militarist foreign policy, and I think the UN gets way too much bad press - but nevertheless I don't see this policy as having wings.

How do you overcome the fact that every time an election occurs, US "commitments", "strategies" and "policies" of deliberate acceptance of international constraint, is up for sale? What are the chances that this emphasis will ultimately last longer than Jimmy Carter's? How do you innure it from setbacks, maybe involving the loss of American life, creating political pressure to roll the whole thing up?

I like international institutions, but I don't see how they'll be able to be created from scratch and significantly empowered beyond now. We're not the only imperalists in the world by a longshot, and the result of that is the regular paralysis of the UN Security Council. This strategy could at best be pursued incrementally - and in the meantime you'll need something else to advocate for America's immediate crises in the ME.

Furthermore, while America and other powers' repeated inventerventions and security, stability and oil interests in the Middle East have been unhelpful to avoiding radical currents and violent conflict, there really is a lot more wrong with the Arab world than that, and you're wrong if you ignore it. The US did not demand the Hama massacre in Syria or the Sudanese massacres in Darfur, and the imbalanced, corrupt, petroleum welfare states of the Gulf, while we did not infuence their development wisely, we are less responsible for them than their actual creators.

It may be true that we cannot singlehandedly transform these countries, and it's almost certainly true that military force should not be the prime element for doing so - but we certainly can be an important positive influence.

Here's a specific example for you: the problems of the Iranian government stem not only from 1953 and from our dependence on the Shah in the 70's, but our stonewalling cold isolation to Iran in the post-revolution years.

International institutions wouldn't hurt, but we don't need them to win the war and midwife the era of political islam.

Posted by: glasnost on September 10, 2006 11:40 PM

zsdlasda

Posted by: perde on October 1, 2007 06:37 AM

ashduıa

Posted by: perde on October 1, 2007 06:38 AM

sdıasds

Posted by: mefruşat on October 1, 2007 06:38 AM

sdasd

Posted by: mefruşat on October 1, 2007 07:07 AM

thank

Posted by: chat on October 8, 2007 09:14 AM

merhaba

Posted by: chat on October 8, 2007 09:15 AM

selam

Posted by: sohbet on October 8, 2007 09:16 AM

merabalar

Posted by: sohbet on October 8, 2007 09:16 AM

seksi

Posted by: Adult on October 8, 2007 09:17 AM

farz

Posted by: islam on October 8, 2007 09:18 AM

yeah thanls

Posted by: rock on November 29, 2007 08:01 AM

thanksss

Posted by: oyun indir on January 13, 2008 01:11 PM

slm

Posted by: perde on February 17, 2008 11:37 AM

harbiarkadas.com
harbiarkadas.net
harbiarkadas.org
itirafet.org
ebedava.net
elektronikmarket.net
ameribress.com
clitoriacream.net
superspenisbuyutucu.com
megabress.com
rednightperformans.com
performansartirici.com
penisplus.tv
penispluspenisbuyutucu.com
penispluspenisbuyutucu.net
cinselmerkez.com
aseks.net
erotikcamasirlar.com
vajinatr.com
bakirevajina.com
cinselkozmetik.com
kozmetikmedikel.com
eturknet.com
tecavuz.net
yutuvideo.com
ponotubesex.com
laraperuk.com
sackanagimerkezi.com
peruksa.com
perukmarket.com
aseks.com
aloveshop.com
erotikgiyim.com
geciktiricispreyler.com
geciktiricihap.com
geciktiriciler.com
azdirici.com
bayanuyarici.com
fntazialemi.com
fantaziservisi.om
cinselmazemeler.com
cinselfantaziurunleri.com
erotikdakikalar.com
erotikmarketiniz.com
seksmarketiniz.com
sekshatlari.com
erotikdergiler.com
erotikderginiz.com
penisbuyutucuviprx.com
penisbuyutucuvigrx.com
penisbuyutuculer.com
vigrxpenisbuyutucu.com
sismebebekler.com
sismebebekshop.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
elektronikmarket.net
ebedava.net
kontortr.com
elaydin23.com
turkcellkontorcu.com
aveakontoral.com
vodafonekontoral.com
toptankontorcu.com
cinselkozmetik.com
bayanpartnerler.com
erkekpartnerler.com
kizarkadaslar.com
yonjaarkadas.com
siberalem-siberalem.com
sexpartnerler.com
sekspartnerler.com
erotikpartnerler.com
gencyuz.com
erkekarkadaslar.com
bayanarkadaslar.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
baskahaber.com
medikalkozmetik.net
kozmetikmedikal.com
zayiflamavediyet.net
zayiflamahapii.com
zayiflamabandii.com
kilovertr.com
zayiflamatr.net
diyettr.com
toksinbandi.net
botoxtr.com
botokstr.com
selulittedavii.com
selulitgiderici.net
selulitkremii.com
catlaktedavisii.com
catlakgiderici.net
catlakkremii.com

sex shop

Posted by: sexshop on November 10, 2008 04:55 AM

thanks for all

Posted by: sex shop on March 29, 2009 08:11 AM

Thanks

Posted by: coders on May 5, 2009 02:56 PM

çıtı japon sikiş büyük penis videoları alo alo amları pornol OGLUYLA SEXYAPAN KADIN on sekiz yaşında sex sikiş arşivi ateş gibi am vidosu japon kızı sikiyorlar lezbiyeyle sex ogretmenıyle sex yapan zorla ateşli temizlik yaparken amın gögüs kadın sex manue sikiş zorla ateşli film öğretmeniyle seks yapa sevişenler yalayanlar adam kadını sikmek ist sexi türbanlı foğrafla yaşlı olgun kadın sexl 3d sikiş www.adultkurt.sex.com erotik gögüsl lezbiyenler yalama emm zorla seks yaptıran ka kurt+sex+video çoklu video sıcak amını yalatma vidyosu yengem ve ben erotik f ağzıma sıç \"porno\" poposunu okşatıyor OLGUN KADINLA ÇOCUK Vİ arab kızı sevişme sikiş göm yara videosu aloporno, dövme porno sedat poyraz sikişme acemi seks izle 3d seks izle olgun kadın ve erkek c porno amını okşuyo erk yaşlı erkek penisi penis okşayan kadın rastgele sıcak video sudan pornosu jale erotik am sikişmesi vidyosu sex de haz porno filimler videola porno izle seks net vi sınıfta seks video ünlülerin seks videola postacı ve sıcak sex v yengem.com izle dunyanın en seksi +sık Sìkis fotograflari şiman sex video olgun sex videosu momerotic.com teyzem kudurdum com japon kızı iki suda sex ızle iniltili sevişme olgun kadın amcıkları seksi ünlülerin kilotl bagidira bagidira siki sıcak olgun sex pornol tangalı hemşireler full dvd sarısın tatlı atesli arap sex youtube ücretsiz temiz sıcak sex porno 18 sarhoş çiftlerin sex gurup sex vidiyoları seksi olgun kadın yabancı olgun manken s karı amına sokturuyor olgun manuel sikişi srısın pornodvd izle manita bozmak video www.zevkpartner.com www.adultpostaci.com seks sikiş erotik vide manyak kız ne yapıyor manyak kız ne yapıyor japon kızına zorla sik evli kadın pornoları mühteşem amlar büyük yarakla seks yap öğretmenle bayan sikmeleri erotik dvd porno bedav sahibe video acemi porno yaşlı büyük meme porno amtv sünnetsiz yaraklarda s porno .pilis evde sexs videoları kıçtan sikme pasif sikme izle erotik sikiş videoları zenci kızların sikiş f sevişen insanlar video güzel sarışın hatun fo saksafon çeken kadın milf porno videoları amerikan güreş kadınla www.minietekcom bardaseks orosbo adreslari amdan sikilme videolar www teyzem kom tr teyze kızı sex eğlenceli videolar halterci sex arap kadın beyaz erkek am siken dalgıç zevkten ölüyor porno siyah sütyen lezbiyen erotik sıcak video yasli kadinlar 50 üzer balık etli ve kilolu k www.zevkinde seks.com fahişe sex.com amatör sikilş yaşlı olgun şikişi kaymak sikişler karısını başkasıyla si komşuyla sex videoları Parayla sikişen kadınl sicak sikis sahneleri üniformalı erotik vide sex yapan erkeler erotiklezbiyen-fotoğra sevişmeden sexe geçen zengin masaj sex kadınsikişi sex isteyen çocuk sexi erotik sikişmeler gizli kamera çiş oral sex yapan kızlar erotik sikişmeler lezbiyenler sex duvarın kenarında zorl sikme sikis erotik por üvey annesiyle sikişen film sex gemisi etiket fantasy erotıc vıdeo hot blonde fuck video youtube sıcak sikiş vi evli kadınlar seks boğazına kadar sokuyor sex eğitimi videosu altadma porno star sks amdan koyma pornoları kürt kadınların seks v penis yalayan gaylar azgın video İNİLTİLİ SİKİŞLER cılgın roman kızı porn öğretmeiyle sex yapn e büyük kilitoris videol kudurduk seks 18 lik fıstıklar ayakkabılı porno izle yarrak gallery izliyler porn kız soyunarak show yap www.seksyapan.olgun.ka muhteşem anal şişman olgun yarak alı zevkmania travesti zevkmania wc ÜNLÜ KADINLARIN FİRİKİ 18 lik. fıstık izle güzel göüslü sarışın fahişe sex penisi ağzına sokan ka sex yapan fotolar şişman kadın am asyalılar videosu hamile travesti dvd se seks altmış dokuz izle yarak arayan kadınlar dolgun komşu sex mini gecelik porno kadı sex amını yidim adult kurd pporno hika BİRANEDE SİKİŞ lezbiyenannem guzel seks ponor porno erotik sikiş tv kilitoris resimleri şaşkin sıkış sicak türban sikis 18lik fıstıklar izlese asyalı kadınlar erotik seksi spiker kızlar po sex inlemek olgun kadın geç adama temizlikçi domaldı göğüslerden sevişenler cilgin türbanli arab s orosbunun sikişi sicakse olgun kadın çocuk siki aksiadult en güzel işkenceli sex GİZLİ çekim sikilş kocasex sutyenci porno müziklisikiş göğüslerini okşatan ka sex izle spiker kızler porno seksi sarışın pornolar bedava göt popo kalça büyük penis zenci porn ACEM SEKS sevgiyi siktim video i sicaksesk.net kizlik boz duranlar amsikişi amını sulandıran kadın 3d anal porno filmler dulorospular sikismek icin bir baya erotik sexs porno siki geç kızlar sikiş olgunkadın sex real erotık vidyo web camerotik çok zor sikiyor izle zenci sitriptiz konulu dvd porno erot guiza sikiş siyah kızlar sikiş amına flüt sokan kız evli kadınların erkekl yaşlı olgun pornosu göte sokan adam bbs sexs izle alman öğretmenle sex ünlüler sex video izle rus zenci sikişi porno kız kulesi domalma sex izle parayla sexyapanlar you zenci kadın web camerotik film ikiztepeler sex porno banyodan ciktiktan son pkk kadın orosbuları orgazm kadın zencilere sikilen japo kuaförde sikişiyor sex porn domalma kurt kızın pornosu öğretmenle ilgili erot zenci adamların penisl gecelık gıyen sarışınl am okşayan kadınlar hep sikiş tam sikiş turkyarak www.seks.yapanolgun.ka çiflik pornosu 25 santim penis seks sikşen orosbu videolar amcuk pictures çocuk olgun sex büyük yarak isdeyen ka kaymak am sik yarak orla sikme porno seks yaşlı olgun kadının oh sesi erotik ınsaatta sıkıs vıdeo, büyük penisiyle seks y oral seks video eve erkek alan kirli kilot sex 89 model sex kocaman yarağı seven o sevişen kadın video komşusuna tecavüz vide evli kadınla sikiş vid cücelerin sevişmesi iz dul olgum kadın pornos japon sex izle yarak kadın ıste adult bedava frikik iz seksin izle amatör domalma hamile doğum videosu sibel kekili vikipedi büyük memeli yaşlı kad sex videoları öğretmen seksi erotik kızlar seviştikten sonra siki kız kudurtan ama küçük RAMBONUN PORNOSU igrenç sex video büyük yarakla seks yap yanlız bekaret videola ölesiye sikiyolar izle yaşlı ve olgun sikişi amına sokarım porno köpek sex video evli kadınların zenciy sokarım pornosu seksi dans yaparak sik full dvd pornosex azgın seks videoları Arı zenci porno dvd tender teen seks acemi kız pornosu yaşlı kadınların sex h sevişen eşler video kendi amını okşayan kı buyuk yarrak amda oldun kadın sikişleri am traşı hikayesi iki sevişen emo kızlar En tatli erotik video kanadaadult göt ve popo hikayeleri disco sex parmak yalama videosu romen kızına amdan boş erotik seks izle porno sikiş fotomodel erotik yenge yenge genç güzel kızlar porn erkek sikiş videoları evli erkek sikiş video Gamze ozturk momsfuck kocasını boynuzlayan k orosbu isimleri komşu kızı zorla tek i sikişien izle büyük göğüslü kadınlar bedava türkçeyeşilçam ero kürt olgun adamla karı siki olgun kadin citir erke tek gecelik sikiş sohb derste sevişen öğretme seksi filim rel asyalı full dvd sikiş 18likfıstık alyssa milano bacak ar türban.net büyük aletli seks vide you tube şikişik or zevkkafesicom.tr yarrak89 kadın zola sıkış oral sex yapan kadınla ayakda porno büyük memli kadınlar olgun sarışın sevişme türban adult sex diskodasikiş DOMALMA EROTİK genc erotik film izle lez sütyenli konulu dvd porno erotı amcuğa kaymak hamile sikis video fre seksi kalçalar sikiş parayla sex yapan kadı 25 santin penis seks f banggang sınıfta seks izle tits seks partisi boğa inek sikişmesi öğrenci veriyor sex çapkın kızın seksleri xadult göt sikilş bollywood sikiş filmi jinekolog porna yaşlıorosbu tül çoraplı kızlar olgun sarışın video japon sexs videosu porno giglian olgun ve yaşlı kadın s kız kardeşi ile seks kadını adamın penisiyl acemi kızlar pornosu tatilciler sikiş olgun erotik seks kısa sex videolar yaşlı sarkık götler COCUK OLGUN KADIN SEKS yapay seks vajinayı okşama kızı ağlatıyor yaşlı kadin genc adaml olgun kadınlar sex hik amcuk ve sik izle sikiş yapalım dullar v lezbiyen erotik video POPOSU BUYUK ORUSPU SK işkence seks sikişte sıcak dakikala biseksüel ADAMLARIN PO yumuşak büyük memeli k beya büyük kalça sikiş hemsıreler sıkıs sarışin yaşlı güzel ka türkiyenin yeşilçam po garanti sikişenler.com aletimin başı girdi zevktube sex sesli hereketli seks ereotik lezbiyen filim sürtünen lezbiyenler büyük penisli seks vid pornofilm dvd izle msn de soyunan kadın sikis buyuk yarak olgun kadın cocuk erke 11 yaşında sikişen kız private seks ikiztepeler turk sex KUDURMUŞLAR PORNO jigolo sikiş videoları sex videolari seks türk adult seks porno annesi ile sikişenler sarhoş kadınlarla sex asyalı kızları teröris sıcak seks vıdeo şirkette seks videolar asyalı mastürbasyon 25 cm lik yarak hikaye www sikiş 21 kom kardeş sex videosu olgun kadınlar sex çoban erotic çapkın kadın kadın sex party daracık ama kol gibi y kiz kani seks dul avrat resimleri po 69sex şişman kadın lezbiyen girl vurarak sikiyor japon kızları sex ceki 9-10 fucket porno se heteroseksüel sikiş olgun amina salatalik işkenceli sikiş suda seks izle combat sikiş izle porno sikilş izle sevişme olgun kadın çişini yapan kadınlar kocasının arkadaşıyla öğrencilerle sevişen b teen tender sex kamerada amını okşayan porno erotik sikiş vid mini etekli yasli olgu www zenciler com sikişli sahnalar bbs erotıx VAJİNA TRAŞ VİDEO memelerimi yala zalim zenci sikişi 3D porno film video döverek sikiyor SEKS VE FAHİŞELER azeri kızı seks erotikünlüler filmi masaj lı sex adultworld porno oral yapan kız olgunkadın seksi sikişken anneler sikişen bembeyaz kadın yasli adam got videol sek sene videolari hamile hadın sikişi erotik kaslı kadın vid yaşli kadın poposu fetish kiz pornoru sikişirken zevkten çıl banyoda zenci manita porno sex porno izle seks net vi sex pornoerotik film i öğretmen öğrencisini e kendi istegiyle sikişe

Posted by: sikiş on June 5, 2009 12:48 PM

thanks

Posted by: evdeneve on June 23, 2009 06:48 AM

Thank You Matthew
| Filmizle | Film izle | şarkı sözü | şarkı sözleri | hit şarkı sözleri | türkçe şarkı sözleri | yabancı şarkı sözleri | şarkı ekle | şarkı ara | şarkı sözü bul | şarkı sözü ekle | en güzel şarkı sözleri | Vizyon Filim | VizyonFilmi | Seyret | Filmini | Full izle | Dizi izle | Online izle | Filmini izle | Film izlemek | Online Full Seyret izle | Bedava Film izle | internetten Film izle | Online Sinema izle | Videoizlesene | Online Dizi izle | Erotik Filmler | indirmeden Full izle | 18 Filmler | Son Bölümler | SinemaFanClub | Dini Filmler | Video Klibler | Serdar Ortaç | Online 2009 Filmleri | sinemafan | Online Sinema | Hadise | girbi | Kavak Yelleri | 2009 Filmleri | Film Seyret | Süper Sinema | videocenter | 18 film izle | 2008 Filmleri | Sinema Filmi izle | Sinemalar izle | Videoları izle | Dizifilm izle | indirmeden Film izle | Netten izle | Film izlet | Lost | Maç izle | Canlı izle | Full Film izle | Sinema izle | Yeni Filmler | Vizyondakiler | Vizyon Filmleri | izlesene | Direk izle | Kurtlar Vadisi Pusu | Canlı Yayın Maç | Tekmekan Sinema izle | Netten Bedava izle | Sinema Seyret | Aksiyon Filmler | Yabancı Sinema | Beleş izle | DVDRip Film izle | Canlı Yayın Film izle | XviD Film izle | DivX Film izle | Cinetr | Full dizi | Korku Filmi | Kesintisiz izle | Direkizle | Korkufilmi | Online Film izle | Çizgifilm | Animasyon izle | izle | Canlı Yayın Maç izle | Canlı Yayın Film izle | Kurtlar Vadisi Pusu izle | Vizyondakiler izle | Youtube Gir izle | Ktunnel | Ulusal Tv Kanalları | youtube | Yerel Tv Kanalları | Müzik Tv Kanalları | Spor Tv Kanalları | Tv Frekansları | Yabancı Dram izle | Yabancı Romantik izle | Yabancı Aksiyon izle | Yabancı Macera izle | Yabancı Gerilim izle | Yabancı Korku izle | Yabancı Savaş izle | Yabancı Polisiye izle | Yabancı Dizi izle | Belgesel izle | Fantastik Film izle | Tiyatro izle | İslami Film izle | Çizgi Film | Videoizle | indir izle | Link Değişimi | e-film | e-sinema | islami Filmler | Tiyatro izle | Belgesel izle | Romantik Film izle | Komik Film izle | Seks Filmi izle | Vizyondakiler | Türk Filmi izle | Kemal Sunal Filmleri | Show | imeem | Justin.tv | Tv izle | Tv Seyret | Netlog | Facebook | Youtube | Site Ekle | Siteekle | Link Ekle | Link Değişimi | Toplist | Hit Siteler | Oriflame | Oriflame Kozmetik | Oriflamekozmetik | Oriflametr | Kozmetik | Parfüm | Koku | Cilt Bakımı | Saç | Makyaj | Ruj | Katalog | Üyelik | Satış | Sipariş | Hediye | Kampanya | Kariyer | Kazanç | Fırsat | Oje | Krem | Losyon | Jel | Kazanç | | iş imkanı | Danışman | Temsilci | Sponsor | Bilgi | Bilgibu | Bilgi Bu | Popüler Bil | Bedava Bilgi | Online Bilgi | Ücretsiz Bilgi | iyi Bilgi | Aşk Şiirleri | Diyet | Rüya Tabirleri | Şifalı Bitkiler | Dini Bilgiler | Güzel Sölzer | Atatürk | Sağlık | illerimiz | Eğitim | Anne ve Bebek | Aşk ve Evlilik | internet | Astroloji | Bilgisayar | Fıkralar | Çiçek ve Bitkiler | Sevgi | Türk Tarihi | Oyunlar | Pratik Bilgiler | Güzellik ve Moda | Hava Durumu | ilansayfası | Forum | Efendi Forum | Forumx | Forumtr | Frm | Bilgi Forum | Sağlık Forumu | iş forumu | Wordpress | Joomla | Php Nuke | Forum Turkey | Sohbet | Chat | Muhabbet | Mirc | Efendi | Efendi Sohbet | Canlı Canlı | Heyecanlı | Kızlar | Msn | Sohbet Odaları | Bedava Sohbet | Görüntülü Sohbet | Kameralı Chat | Memur | Memuru | Memurlar | Memurum | Memurumuz | Sağlık Memuru | Polis Memuru | Öğretmen | Atama | Yer Değiştirme | Tayin | Becayiş | Yönetmelik | 657 | Devlet Memuru | Sivil Memur | Bağkur | Forum | Aşk | Sevgi | IRC | Programlama Dilleri | Paneller | Türkçe Forum | İşletim Sistemleri | Donanım | Yazılım | Emekli Sandığı | Bağ-kur | Kanun | Torpil | KPSS | Sınav | ÖSYM | OSS | Kamu Personeli | Doktor | Doktorlar | Hemşire | Ebe | Hemşireler | Ebeler | Hademe | Milli Eğitim | Hastane | Okul | Lisans | Doktora | LDS | TUS | Sözleme | Sözleşmeli Memur | Sözleşmeli Personel | Personel | Diyanet | İmam | Asker | Askeri Personel | Subay | Astsubay | Polis | Hakim | Savcı | Avukat | Hukuk | Mühendis | Karayolları | Belediye | Zabıta | şarkı sözü | şarkı sözleri | hit şarkı sözleri | türkçe şarkı sözleri | yabancı şarkı sözleri | şarkı ekle | şarkı ara | şarkı sözü bul | şarkı sözü ekle | en güzel şarkı sözleri | Güvenlik | TCK | Devlet Su işleri | Özel idare | Köy Hizmetleri | Alt Yapı | Daire Başkanlığı | Tıbbi Sekreter | Sekreter | Dışişleri | içişleri | Bakanlık | Bakanlıklar | Memur Sorunları | Psikolojik Danışmanlık | Taltif | Terfi | Ödül | Hediye | Kıdem | Derece | Kademe | Emeklilik | Emekli olmak | Emeklilik Tarihi | Başarılı Personel | Ceza | Kıdem Cezası | Disiplin Cezası | Disiplin Tüzüğü | Personel Alımı | Bayan Personel | Erkek Personel | Disiplin Cezası | Disiplin Cezaları | Sicil | Sicil Affı | Ruhsat | Disiplin Affı | Silah | Pasaport | Yeşil Pasaport | Eş ve Çocuklar | Bakmakla Yükümlü | Yardım | Sağlık Yardımı | Para Yardımı | Borç | Sandık | Sendika | Sendikası | Sendikalar | Üye Olma | Ayrılma | Meslekten Atma | Meslektan Çıkarma | Yemek | Binbir Tarif | Pasta Tarifi | Kek Tarifi | Tatlı Tarifi | Yemek Tarifleri | Türk Yemekleri | Yöresel Yemekler | Tarifler | Oriflame | Oriflame Kozmetik | binbirtarif | Oriflametr | Kozmetik | Parfüm | Koku | Cilt Bakımı | Saç | Makyaj | Ruj | Katalog | Üyelik | Satış | Sipariş | Hediye | Kampanya | Kariyer | Kazanç | Fırsat | Oje | Krem | Losyon | Jel | Kazanç | | iş imkanı | Danışman | Temsilci | Sponsor | Video ekle | Videolar | Video izle | Video seyret | Video yükle | Komik Video | Kamera Şakaları | Korkunç Videolar | İlginç Videolar | Bedava Video Ekle | Bedava video yükle | Yükle izle | youtube videolar | Video Paylaş | Site Ekle | SiteEkle | Toplist | Hit Sayacı | Dizin | Link Değişimi Backlink | Ücretsiz Site Ekle | Forum | Cpanel | Plesk | IRC | Lxadmin | Türkçe Paneller | Host | İşletim Sistemleri | Donanım | Yazılım | Bedava Site Ekle | karşılıksız Site Ekle | Site | Babil | Babil Host | Hosting | Dantel | Türk Dantel | Örgü Dantel | Oya | Dantel Örnekleri | Filmizle | Film izle | Sohbet | Chat | Şarkı | Şarkı Sözleri |

Posted by: Toplist on June 23, 2009 09:54 AM

Post A Comment

advertise_liberally.gif