Risk and Reward

The Democrats' strategy of trying to essentially hide behind the skirts of the handful of Republican torture opponents appears to be working, which I would have thought unlikely as of a couple of weeks ago. I do, however, wonder a bit about its wisdom. At the end of the day, the odds that Democratic candidates are going to pick up a lot of votes from strong torture advocates remains low, this gambit notwithstanding. Conversely, by relying on McCain et. al. to do the heavily lifting, Democrats are essentially denying themselves the possiblity of reaping whatever rewards may exist for standing up for basic decency and morality against Bush's depredations.

What's more, it seems to me that ducking national security fights involves some bad optics merely as such. A lot of doubts about Democrats and security issues have less to do with concrete policy than with essentially characterological concerns and if you worry that liberals are timid and easily frightened, well, then this is some fairly timid and frightened-looking behavior.

On the other other hand, however, I do continue to think that the tactical skills of the current Democratic legislative leaders have been largely underappreciated. As Amy Sullivan pointed out in the Spring, they're actually pretty damn clever and effective considering the objective difficulty of operating as a minority party.

Comments

I'd say that ducking isn't bad optics if nobody sees you. Really, the places where I'd like to see Democrats beat up Bush on national security are on Iraq and Osama issues.

I suppose if they forcefully made the pragmatic argument against torture and tied it to pre-war intelligence failures, that could be pretty effective. But I'm not complaining. And I agree with you that the current leadership is quite good. Reid and Pelosi are such an advance over Daschle/Gephardt that it's not even funny.

Posted by: Neil the Ethical Werewolf on September 15, 2006 01:32 AM

"I'd say that ducking isn't bad optics if nobody sees you. Really, the places where I'd like to see Democrats beat up Bush on national security are on Iraq and Osama issues."

Yup.

"I suppose if they forcefully made the pragmatic argument against torture and tied it to pre-war intelligence failures, that could be pretty effective."

Nope.

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 01:43 AM

I dunno, Neil. I think MY has this right: Dems aren't going to pick up anyone who believes that support for torture is a prerequisite to any claim of a strong foreign policy, and they offer up another example of their unwillingness to fight the other guy. I think that unwillingness translates to a general sense that the Dems are the guys with the caved-in chests, and it makes it hard for the electorate to picture us as protectors of US interests. Nobody likes the bully, but everybody trusts him to hold up his end in a fight.

I'm also a big fan of Reid and Pelosi, but I hope they pick a fight soon, and this would have been a good one to fight on. How hard can it be to run ads contrasting Patrick Henry and John Cornyn? How hard is to label as cowards a party led by draft dodgers?

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 01:48 AM

"A lot of doubts about Democrats and security issues have less to do with concrete policy than with essentially characterological concerns"

I know that folks who'd like to see Dems foreground certain position love to say this, but that doesn't make it true.

Democratic problems on national security are tied to a perception that they will be less willing to use force, not that they aren't promoting a dovish line more forcefully.

"At the end of the day, the odds that Democratic candidates are going to pick up a lot of votes from strong torture advocates remains low"

Of course, the actual strategic calculus isn't about anything like this...

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 01:56 AM

And the best thing about the current dynamic, of course, is that it's complicating McCain's road to the nomination.

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 01:57 AM

"Reid and Pelosi are such an advance over Daschle/Gephardt that it's not even funny."

I agree about Reid, but not about Pelosi. Geppy is about due for a re-evaluation of his reputation upwards, and Pelosi's lack of skill at outdoor politics give me the heebie-jeebies about the dynamics if we take back the House.

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 02:04 AM

I think they've got this one about right. Bush/Cheney would *love*
to fight the midterms on "we slap terrorists around, and the Democrats
want to mollycoddle them". Substantively, it's important that we
don't let this terrible legislation pass; but letting the few
moderately-sane Republican senators do the heavy lifting seems smart.
McCain in particular, having been on the wrong end of torture, has
the perfect standing to make Bush look foolish and wrong on this.

Whatever the question, Democrats should just say "Bush thinks capturing
or killing bin Laden is not a top priority; vote for us and we'll
make it happen".

Posted by: Richard Cownie on September 15, 2006 02:11 AM

"Bush/Cheney would *love* to fight the midterms on "we slap terrorists around, and the Democrats want to mollycoddle them"

Of course. It boggles my mind that Matthew would think that better treatment of terrorist suspects would be a winning campaign issue.

This, like many civil liberties issues, involves protecting the rights of immensely unpopular people for an abstract reason. That doesn't mean we shouldn't stand firmly against torture, but don't pretend it's a general election winning issue.

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 02:31 AM

See, that's why I like the pragmatic argument. It doesn't matter whether the people are popular or unpopular. It's just that you're going to get crappy information.

Posted by: Neil the Ethical Werewolf on September 15, 2006 02:50 AM

See, that's why I like the pragmatic argument. It doesn't matter whether the people are popular or unpopular. It's just that you're going to get crappy information.

But it always works when they do it on the teevee...

Posted by: DMonteith on September 15, 2006 03:14 AM

THat's why you don't make it about protecting the torturee: the argument is that being a torturer is evil, and America is better than a tinpot dictatorship and is strong enough not to resort to such tactics.

Posted by: yoyo on September 15, 2006 03:18 AM

"See, that's why I like the pragmatic argument. It doesn't matter whether the people are popular or unpopular. It's just that you're going to get crappy information."

The pragmatic argument may be a better electoral argument than some others anti-torture arguments, but that still doesn't mean it's a winning electoral argument.

Think of it this way: the right has many arguments for why the minimum wage shouldn't be increased. While some of those arguments are better than others, they'd prefer to spend as little time as possible offering those arguments during election season.

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 06:06 AM

What's more, it seems to me that ducking national security fights involves some bad optics merely as such.

You can't fight on all fronts at once - that's bad strategy. If the Democrats are perceived as hitting Bush hard on the Iraq debacle and on OBL, it won't matter if they're not fighting out front on torture because the "optics" will still be Democratic opposition to Bush's failed policies.

Democratic problems on national security are tied to a perception that they will be less willing to use force, not that they aren't promoting a dovish line more forcefully.

I think this oversimplifies things a bit. I think that it's pretty clear that you can't beat a political opponent without meaningfully differentiating yourself from him or her on the central issue of the day. The Democrats need to run on a foreign policy that is immediately and obviously different from Bush's.

Because Bush's policy is essentially to be a crazed hawk at all times, or at least to sound like one, the Democratic position must necessarily be more dovish in some sense. Now, I certainly agree that being loudly "anti-war" is a bad way to go, but the way the issue hits the Democrats, purely politically, is to find a way to be anti-war within a generally forceful narrative.

Posted by: DivGuy on September 15, 2006 08:37 AM

The only thing that makes sense to me to explain the abject cowardice of our Democratic Senators and Representatives is blackmail. The GOP has slowly and methodically got the goods on the shysters and mucketymucks we've put our faith in. And they've just squeeeeeezed their little larynxes shut.

Posted by: Jeffrey Davis on September 15, 2006 08:47 AM

Democratic problems on national security are tied to a perception that they will be less willing to use force, not that they aren't promoting a dovish line more forcefully.

I think you're misunderstanding the thrust of MY's argument. I believe he's not saying that Dems need to promote a dovish line more forcefully, but that they need to, generally, walk like they have a pair. They can talk anyway they want. This isn't really about Dems showing "courage" or any other useless characteristic; it's about being forceful at a personal level on the belief that it will increase voters' belief in Dems willingness to do it at a state level.

As I think I said at Ezra's, I suspect that if Kerry had knocked Bush down after one of the debates and peed on him in front of a national audience, Bush wouldn't have been re-elected. (Kerry wouldn't have been elected, either.) In fact, the only person who seemed to understand this point in '04 was Edwards, who, in closing days, noted that Bush had been a cheerleader and he'd played football.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 08:47 AM

I think you're misunderstanding the thrust of MY's argument. I believe he's not saying that Dems need to promote a dovish line more forcefully, but that they need to, generally, walk like they have a pair.

Right, but that doesn't mean that if Bush says he loves puppies, Harry Reid needs to stage a press conference where he kicks a puppy in the groin. Some stances are popular, and some aren't.

While it's impossible to get elected without differentiating yourself from your opponent, it remains a matter of tact as to which issues you will focus on and how loudly you make your objections. As long as the Democrats continue to present a forceful (and basically correct) opposition to Bush's failed policy in Iraq and his failure to capture Osama, it won't matter much what the optics are on the torture tribunal issue.

Also, there's a substantive side to the torture tribunal issue. The Democrats need to beat this bill, for obvious moral reasons. The best way to unify the Republican majority in favor of the bill would be loud opposition, such that Republican apostates like Graham and Collins would appear to be helping the Democrats by opposing the bill. You can't take the politics out of politics, and all that. So, not only may it be smart politics for November to lay low on the torture bill, but I think it's definitely good tactics for beating the bill.

Posted by: DivGuy on September 15, 2006 08:58 AM

Right, but that doesn't mean that if Bush says he loves puppies, Harry Reid needs to stage a press conference where he kicks a puppy in the groin. Some stances are popular, and some aren't.

Everyone already believes Reid is anti-puppy. They also believe that he likes to kill them in craven, duplicitous, hidden ways. All purely pro-puppy votes are going to Bush anyway; people's belief on Reid's puppy position are set. If Reid gets on stage and bites the head off of a live puppy, OTOH, he'll pick up voters who don't care one way or the other about puppies but do care about cravenness-as-reflected-by-methods-of-puppy-killing. (Seriously--why haven't the Dems killed anyone's pets? It's like they WANT to lose.)

Sometimes the point of the fight is just to show that you like to fight, and that you're good at it. Like in an action movie, or (I suspect) politics. Cripes, let's be honest, there's a pretty good chance that's what's motivated our Iraq policy.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 09:21 AM

I'll buy DivGuy's argument. On moral grounds I'll take defeat of the bill over a strong, principled stance against torture. The latter may or may not be better for the party ('wise'), but the former is necessary. The few Republican holdouts have at least a little decency but they would fold if seen as aligned with the Democrats.

Posted by: tib on September 15, 2006 09:25 AM

The best way to unify the Republican majority in favor of the bill would be loud opposition, such that Republican apostates like Graham and Collins would appear to be helping the Democrats by opposing the bill.

I think core Red voters may think like this, but that independents are more likely to line up behind Graham and McCain. So all we've done is give the Republicans a little show in which they can claim that they have something for everyone, be you looking for a nutter or a "strong, independent" voice. Graham and McCain reassure Blue State Republican voters that their party has not become the party of idiots and barbarians.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 09:36 AM

SCMT -

I wasn't talking about voters. I'm talking about the Democrats creating the circumstances most likely to bring about a defeat for the torture bill. I think that the Republican apostates have proven their weakness time and time again, and if the Democrats started talking about the torture bill as a partisan issue, they would likely lose the support of the Grahams and Collinses. And if we're going to be confident in defeating the bill, the best thing to do is prevent its passage. At the moment, Reid seems to have done that, though obviously the game isn't over.

I'm also concerned that your reading of the situation has an unfortunate tinge of "everything that happens is bad news for hte Democrats." I don't think that separation from the White House is going to be possible for most all of the endangered Repubs, and I don't think it's a winning strategy anyway - once you're talking about the extent of your opposition to Bush and Bush's policies, you're fighting a war on Democratic territory in which Democrats have large, natural advantage.

Posted by: DivGuy on September 15, 2006 09:46 AM

DG: Yeah, I understood that you weren't speaking to voter perceptions; I thought about noting that, but didn't. In any case, you may be right about the Republican apostates, but I'd really love it if the news stories on this issues mentioned a couple of prominent but not particularly liberal Dems. I have a hard time believing anyone much short of Kennedy is going to shift McCain and Graham.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 09:51 AM

"Sometimes the point of the fight is just to show that you like to fight, and that you're good at it. Like in an action movie, or (I suspect) politics."

Politics, much like warfare, is decided by who picks the ground where the fights take place.

The GOP feels no compunctions to fight out in the open over the minimum wage, just to show that they like to fight.

Winning generals pick their battles wisely.

Posted by: Petey on September 15, 2006 09:56 AM

The GOP feels no compunctions to fight out in the open over the minimum wage, just to show that they like to fight.

I'm not sure that speaks to the issue. Nobody doubts that the Republicans like to fight. Reagan had one war against Grenada, yanked us out of Beirut after the attack there, and reached out to Gorbachev, but few think of him as unwilling to fight. Part of that is policy, part of that is the language he used, but part of it is simply that everyone thought Reagan was, if anything, too aggressive.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 10:36 AM

SCMT -

Even insofar as that's true, the Republicans didn't get their reputation by fighting against the minimum wage, or against other Democratic proposals with popular support. you seem to be arguing for a strategy of fighting without regard for the individual issues which are at stake in the fight or the politics of those issues. I find it highly unlikely that indiscriminate aggression is or ever has been a successful strategy.

Posted by: DivGuy on September 15, 2006 10:45 AM

. I find it highly unlikely that indiscriminate aggression is or ever has been a successful strategy.

Yeah, that's certainly true. I suppose I just can't believe that the American people are strongly on their side on this issue. But you go into elections with the voters you have, not the ones you want.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on September 15, 2006 10:57 AM

Democrats are essentially denying themselves the possiblity of reaping whatever rewards may exist for standing up for basic decency and morality against Bush's depredations.

I believe this to be a non-concern as alas, I don't think there are any rewards for standing up for basic decency and morality as too many people in our country think of decency and morality as luxury goods to be abandoned in times of national emergency. Too many people here about "international law", etc., and think "how come a bunch of pansy pointy heads at the UN and swiss cheese eaters who've never had to go to war, get to limit how we can defend ourselves?". Ironically, it is especially our so-called defenders of public morality that are the first to ignore moral issues and be "realistic" (i.e. mean spirited) about torture, etc.

Actually, in some ways this is not such a bad sign: America is a fundamentally secular country and generally it is good that people are more interested in results than morality. The problem is people misunderstand pragmatism. But Dems. would do well to focus on our specialty of being pragmatic and consider talk of morality as only a dual use sort of thing -- i.e. to demonstrate to religious folks we do care about morality. Sen. Boxer is generally good at this sort of balance.

The moral angle is well morally important, and politically so -- but we cannot be seen as willing to sacrifice practicality for morality (ironically, the people least willing to make that sacrifice claim to have strong religious beliefs!): so it would behoove us to emphasize the practice problems with torture: e.g., it produces a lot of false confessions and hence false imprisonments, etc., -- and for every innocent person wrongly locked away, a guilty person is going free.

I know it is appealing to baser instincts, but look at how well the GOP has done doing that!

What's more, it seems to me that ducking national security fights involves some bad optics merely as such. A lot of doubts about Democrats and security issues have less to do with concrete policy than with essentially characterological concerns and if you worry that liberals are timid and easily frightened, well, then this is some fairly timid and frightened-looking behavior.

This is very true.

Posted by: DAS on September 15, 2006 12:06 PM

I think the most discouraging part of this whole issue is how many people think an anti-torture stance is not a good political move. It may be true, but how confident must people be to avoid staking out such an obviously morally obligatory stance? The US government has brutally beaten men it later acknowledged as innocent. This is the biggest problem w/ torture, not the treatment of the guilty (although that's bad too), but the culture of abuse and stupidity it creates. The sheer injustice is mindboggling. I do wish someone was willing to give Americans a chance to show they can appreciate that if the issue is presented clearly, now that a lot more of the dirty details are known.

Posted by: mpowell on September 15, 2006 01:14 PM

I think the most discouraging part of this whole issue is how many people think an anti-torture stance is not a good political move. It may be true, but how confident must people be to avoid staking out such an obviously morally obligatory stance?

Perhaps, like most Americans, they don't think an anti-torture stance -- or, at least, a torture-is-never-justified stance -- is morally obligatory.

Posted by: GOP on September 15, 2006 10:04 PM

Anent the liberals as frightened idea:

Count the number of Democratic veterans of the Iraq War running for Congress this year vs the number of Republicans. 11-1.

Eleven to one.

Now, count the number of chickenhawks encouraging people to go to war without risking anything themselves. Oddly reciprocal, eh?

Posted by: Jeffrey Davis on September 16, 2006 10:13 AM

Timid and frightened is the polite way to describe it.

The Democrats are a bunch of pussies who will go down in history as having been too afraid to stand up for their county's basic principles when they were under attack.

Absolutely fucking pathetic. And stupid too.

Posted by: The Fool on September 16, 2006 08:22 PM

The Democrats have been out of power for so long they're afraid to lose any handhold they have. It is important to vote for them, nevertheless, to balance the Republicans who have lived up to Lord Acton's maxim: "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely." Sure the Democrats are scared, timid, afraid to speak out. So what? Does our analysis of it help the situation? Republicans lie. They continue to lie. The Republicans (and that includes Lieberman) tell lies so they can stay in power. Why is everyone so surprised by this, so astonished, so affronted by it? If you expect them to lie, and anticipate it, as opposed to being blindsided by it, as Kerry was by the swiftboating, then you will perpetually be the victim. And the Democrats have a long history of being aggrieved, of being the victims. Continue along that path, and once again you'll be a victim. As Morris Dees discovered, when you fight back, hit them hard, sue them where it hurts, make them pay dearly for each lie, then you will not be blindsided any more.
Second, it seems to me that the Democrats have been playing the victim, as in "Poor me!", for much too long. First, they let the Republicans mount an attack on them and their positions. Then they act surprised at the "bad" Republicans for doing this. Then they protest, calling what the Republicans do "dispicable" or "dirty tricks" or "untrue". All of which only makes the Democrats look even more like victims. And so they dig their own fate. I also sense that, when they do this and ring their hands, they are hoping the Republicans will receive their comeuppance from some mysterious force, and that they will self-destruct of their own accord. Act like a victim, end up like one. So go out adn vote for a Democrat, no matter how weak, get your friends to vote Democratically, and act to help others do the same.

Posted by: OCPatriot on September 18, 2006 07:56 AM

slm

Posted by: perde on February 17, 2008 11:05 AM

thanks ;)

Posted by: firefox indir on March 31, 2008 06:28 AM

thanks ;)

Posted by: firefox indir on April 1, 2008 11:04 AM

thanks.

Posted by: hekimboard on October 19, 2008 01:45 PM

harbiarkadas.com
harbiarkadas.net
harbiarkadas.org
itirafet.org
ebedava.net
elektronikmarket.net
ameribress.com
clitoriacream.net
superspenisbuyutucu.com
megabress.com
rednightperformans.com
performansartirici.com
penisplus.tv
penispluspenisbuyutucu.com
penispluspenisbuyutucu.net
cinselmerkez.com
aseks.net
erotikcamasirlar.com
vajinatr.com
bakirevajina.com
cinselkozmetik.com
kozmetikmedikel.com
eturknet.com
tecavuz.net
yutuvideo.com
ponotubesex.com
laraperuk.com
sackanagimerkezi.com
peruksa.com
perukmarket.com
aseks.com
aloveshop.com
erotikgiyim.com
geciktiricispreyler.com
geciktiricihap.com
geciktiriciler.com
azdirici.com
bayanuyarici.com
fntazialemi.com
fantaziservisi.om
cinselmazemeler.com
cinselfantaziurunleri.com
erotikdakikalar.com
erotikmarketiniz.com
seksmarketiniz.com
sekshatlari.com
erotikdergiler.com
erotikderginiz.com
penisbuyutucuviprx.com
penisbuyutucuvigrx.com
penisbuyutuculer.com
vigrxpenisbuyutucu.com
sismebebekler.com
sismebebekshop.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
elektronikmarket.net
ebedava.net
kontortr.com
elaydin23.com
turkcellkontorcu.com
aveakontoral.com
vodafonekontoral.com
toptankontorcu.com
cinselkozmetik.com
bayanpartnerler.com
erkekpartnerler.com
kizarkadaslar.com
yonjaarkadas.com
siberalem-siberalem.com
sexpartnerler.com
sekspartnerler.com
erotikpartnerler.com
gencyuz.com
erkekarkadaslar.com
bayanarkadaslar.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
baskahaber.com
medikalkozmetik.net
kozmetikmedikal.com
zayiflamavediyet.net
zayiflamahapii.com
zayiflamabandii.com
kilovertr.com
zayiflamatr.net
diyettr.com
toksinbandi.net
botoxtr.com
botokstr.com
selulittedavii.com
selulitgiderici.net
selulitkremii.com
catlaktedavisii.com
catlakgiderici.net
catlakkremii.com

sex shop

Posted by: sexshop on November 10, 2008 07:06 AM

Now a days web application are increasing


simdi biz bu siteyi kasarken cinsel chat birde sohbet odaları
olarak kasmaya calıstık iki sohbet de ilerleme var ona birde mirc yaptık gun gectikce
kelebek script olarak hit alamaya basladık oda olmadı birde kelebek
radyo muz olsun dedik iyi kotu muhabbet oluyordu ama baktık sohbet
çet cet odaları de is yok donduk indir e ondada tat tuz kalmamıs rüya
tabirlerine zipladık izmir de oturuyorum iste .. sonra da yavas yavas ilerlemeye basladık
turk sohbet odalarına kadar geldik .. bir sonraki hedefimiz
yada mIRC olacak insallah ..

cinsel sohbet | operserv | chanserv | memoserv
nickserv | ask | kadınca oyun itiraf link degisimi siir guzel sozler

izmir sohbet cinsel sohbet kelebek mirc operserv chanserv siir botserv zurna mynet ataturk universitesi sohbet chat odalari au sohbet au chat kelebek script kelebek script kelebek mirc kelebek skript mric gazi universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,gazi sohbet,gazi chat,kelebek duzce universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,duzce sohbet,duzce chat ... ege universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,ege sohbet,ege chat,kelebek dumlu pınar universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,dumlupınar sohbet ... memoserv, memo serv,memoserv komutlari mesaj komutlari irc mesaj ... mirc indir kamerali mirc yabanci mirc mirc 6.21
sesli tv seslisesli sesliask sesli fıkra sesliefsane sesliyiz sesli türkiyem seslialem sesli dini sohbet ... erzincan universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,erzincan sohbet ... Yüzük Script mirc yüzük cet yüzük script 4 yuzuk sohbet yüzük chat ankara sohbet ankara chat ankara muhabbet ankara arkadas ankara.net erciyes universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,erciyes sohbet,erciyes ... dicle universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,dicle sohbet,dicle chat ... mirc indir,mirc script,mirc yukle,mirc,script mırç,mrc,kelebek ... kelebek cinsel sohbet cinsel chat kelebek mirc myrc script mirc programi turkçe mirc indir mric mrc ... izmir sohbet izmir chat izmir muhabbet izmir arkadas izmir cet çet kelebek sohbet odalari chat sohpet cet kelebek muhabbet çet ... arkadasbul askim - arkadas bul, arkadas arama, arkadas ara ... kelebek host iletisim bilgileri sitene sohbet ekle sitene chat ekle sitene sohbet odasi koy kelebek sohbet , chat kelebek sohbet , cet kelebek sohbet , canli ... sohbet Kizlarla Sohbet Kızlarla Sohbet, Bedava Sohbet Odası ... kelebek sohbet chat muhabbet amasya uiversitesi sohbet chat odalari au sohbet au chat canakkale onsekiz mart universitesi sohbet chat odalari comu ... istanbul sohbet istanbul chat istanbul muhabbet istanbul arkadas

Posted by: çet on December 8, 2008 02:17 PM

thanks you

Posted by: kelebek mirc indir on January 9, 2009 07:41 AM

thank you

Posted by: sikiş on April 23, 2009 06:17 PM

Thanks

Posted by: coders on May 5, 2009 02:15 PM

en sıcak videoları izl en sıcak videosu en uzun sikiş videolar engüzel am sikişi ensest sikiş ercan filmleri ercan kadın ercan sesli erdogan filmleri erdogan sesli erkek alma erkek am sikme erkek bekaret erkek göt sikme erkek götü sikme erotic indir erotic müzik erotic siteleri erotikas erotizm erotizme erotizmi erotizmi izle erotizmi video erotizmin erotizmin dorugu erotizmin doruk erotizmin doruk noktas erotizmin doruklari erotizmin doruklarinda erotizmin doruğunda erotizmin sınırları erotizmin tadı erotizmin zirvesi erotske ertika eski sıcak videolar eskimoların esnek esnek kızlık evi sıcak videolar evinden sıcak videolar exit eğitim fair feci sikiş videoları fena sikiş videoları filim videları filim videoları film bedava film komik film sıcak videolar filmler bedava filmleri turkce filmovi fotky foto fotoğraf fransız erotizmi free am sikiş free am sikme free bakire free bekaret free sikiş videoları free sikiş videosu free sıcak videolar free türk sikiş fuck altyazı fuck anlamı fuck indir fuck siteleri fuck sözlük fuck turkce fuck çeviri fuck şarkı fucking altyazı fucking anlamı fucking indir fucking ingilizce fucking turkce ful sikiş videoları full am sikiş full sikiş videoları full sikiş videosu full türk sikiş fulltext galerija gamze özçelik kızlık b gamze özçelik sikiş vi gece am sikme gece bekaret gecede gecesi am sikme gecesi bekaret bozma gerdek gecesi bekaret geriden kızlık gerçek am sikişi gerçek am sikme gerçek bakire bozma gerçek bekaret bozma gerçek sikiş videoları gerçek sikiş videosu gerçek türk sikiş gerçek türk sikişi gezi gibi am sikiş gibi am sikişi gibi am sikme gibi sikiş girls altyazı girls anlamı girls indir girls müzik girls siteleri girls turkce girls çeviri girls şarkı gizli am sikme gizli kamera bakire gizli kamera sikiş vid gizli sikiş videoları gizli türk sikiş gizli çekim sikiş vide gizli çekim sikiş vide gizli çekim sıcak vide gizli çekim türk sikiş gizli çekim türk sikiş gole grup am sikme grup sıcak videolar görüntü videolar göt am sikiş göt amcuk göt deligi sikme göt deliğinden sikme göt deliğini sikme göt den sikme göt hikayeler göt istiyorum göt karı göt kocaman göt kıç göt siker göt siki göt sikici göt sikme com göt sikme filimleri göt sikme filmi göt sikme filmleri göt sikme görüntüleri göt sikme hikaye göt sikme hikayesi göt sikme oyun göt sikme pornası göt sikme pornoları göt sikme pornosu izle göt sikme pozisyonları göt sikme pozisyonu göt sikme resimleri göt sikme resmi göt sikme sahneleri göt sikme sahnesi göt sikme ve göt sikme video izle göt sikme videolar göt sikme videoları iz göt sikme videosu izle göt sikme vidioları göt sikme vidiosu göt sikme vidoları göt sikme vidosu göt sikme vidyo göt sikme vidyoları göt sikme vidyosu göt sikmesi göt sokma göt sokuş göt ten sikme götsikme com götsikme videoları götü siker götü sikme video götü sikme videoları götünü sikme götünü sikme oyunları götünü sikme oyunu götünü sikme videoları götünü sikmesi götünü sikmeye gülben gülben ergen sikiş vid gülben ergen sikiş vid gülben ergen videoları gülben ergenin sikiş v güzel am sikiş güzel am sikme güzel bakire güzel göt sikme güzel sikme güzel sıcak videolar hamam arıyorum hamam hikaye hamam hikayeleri hamam hikayesi hamam sikiş hande ataizi sıcak vid hard sikiş videoları hatun sikiş videoları haydar dümen kızlık hayvan pornoları hayvan sikiş videoları hayvan videları hayvanlarla sikiş vide hayvanlarla videoları hayvanlısex hesla hikaye videoları hikaye çeviri hikayeler göt hikayeler hamam hikayeleri turkce hikayesi turkce hint erotizmi hrvatska http www hurriyet kadın hülya avşar sikiş vide hülya avşar sıcak vide hülya koçyigit hülya koçyiğit pornosu hülya sikiş hızlı am sikme ile am sikme ile sıcak videolar ilgili sıcak videolar ilginç olaylar ilişkide ilk am sikişi ilk am sikme ilk gece bekaret ilk kızlık in sıcak videoları indiir indir com indir sikiş ingilizce adult ingilizce fuck ingilizcede bakire insan sikiş internet inşaat islamda bekaret istanbul sikiş italyan erotizmi iyi am sikişi iyi am sikme izle videolar izlesen sıcak videolar izlesene com sıcak vid izlesene sıcak videola izlesene türk sikiş izmir sikiş işkenceli sikiş videol japan bakire japon am sikme japon bakire japon bakire bozma japon bekaret japon bekaret bozma japon erotizmi japon kızlık japon sikiş videoları japon sıcak videolar jebanje jinekoloji kadın alma kadın erotizmi kadın hamam kadın sozluk kadın tarkan kadın türkçe kadınlar hamam kadınlar türkçe kalamazsın bakire kaliteli sikiş kalın sikiş kanaması kanar kanlı am sikiş kanlı am sikme kanı kara am sikiş karikatür karı götü sikme karının götünü sikme kaymak sikiş kazalar videolar kesintisiz am sikme keyifli sikiş killi am sikişi killi am sikme killi sikiş kizlikzari komik filmler komik sıcak videolar komik video komik video görüntüler konulu sıcak videolar korkunç görüntüler körpe am sikişi körpe am sikme küçük am sikiş küçük am sikme küçük bakire küçük göt sikme küçük kızlık bozma küçük penis küçük sikme kıllı am sikişi izle kıllı am sikme videola kıllı am sikme videosu kılsız am sikiş kılsız am sikişi kılsız am sikme kılsız sikiş kılı am sikiş kılı am sikişi kılı am sikme kısa am sikme kısa sikiş videoları kısa sikiş videosu kısa sıcak videolar kızlarda bekaret kızların am sikişi kızların am sikme kızların sikiş videola kızlık alma kızlık anı kızlık b kızlık bakirelik kızlık baozma kızlık bekaret kızlık bo kızlık boma kızlık bosma kızlık boz kızlık boz ma kızlık boza kızlık bozam kızlık bozama kızlık bozan kızlık bozanlar kızlık bozarken kızlık bozba kızlık bozduran kızlık bozduranlar kızlık bozma bekaret kızlık bozma nasıl kızlık bozma nasıl olu kızlık bozmaa kızlık bozmak video kızlık bozmalar kızlık bozmaları kızlık bozmalı kızlık bozmanın ingili kızlık bozmaporno kızlık bozmapornosu kızlık bozması kızlık bozmavideo kızlık bozmavideoları kızlık bozmavideosu kızlık bozmaü kızlık bozme kızlık bozmz kızlık bozulma kızlık bozulması kızlık bozulur kızlık bozulurken kızlık bozumu kızlık bpzma kızlık buzma kızlık bızma kızlık com kızlık dikilmesi kızlık dikimi kızlık dikme kızlık diktirme kızlık diktirmek kızlık gitti kızlık kanama kızlık kanaması kızlık kanı kızlık nasıl kızlık nasıl bozulur kızlık nasıl bozulur v kızlık nedir kızlık ozma kızlık patlatma video kızlık resmi kızlık tamiri kızlık video kızlık yırtma kızlık yırtılması kızlık zar kızlık zar bozma kızlık zar dikimi kızlık zar patlatma kızlık zarları kızlık zarrı kızlık zarı alma kızlık zarı bekaret kızlık zarı bozarken kızlık zarı bozma vide kızlık zarı bozmak kızlık zarı bozması kızlık zarı bozulurken kızlık zarı bozuluşu kızlık zarı bozumu kızlık zarı dikilir kızlık zarı dikilir mi kızlık zarı dikilmesi kızlık zarı dikim kızlık zarı dikimi kızlık zarı dikimi vid kızlık zarı dikme kızlık zarı diktirme v kızlık zarı diktirmek kızlık zarı nasıl deli kızlık zarı nasıl patl kızlık zarı nasıl patl kızlık zarı nasıl yırt kızlık zarı onarımı kızlık zarı yırtma kızlık zarı yırtma vid kızlık zarı yırtılma a kızlık zarı yırtılma v kızlık zarıbozma kızlık zarını kızlık zarını bozma kızlık zarını bozma vi kızlık zarını bozmak kızlık zarını bozuyor kızlık zarını diktirme kızlık zarını diktirme kızlık zarını patlatma kızlık zarını patlatıy kızlık zarını yırtma kızlık zarının kızlık zarının bozuldu kızlık zarının bozuluş kızlık zarının delinme kızlık zarının kanamas kızlık zarının patlatı kızlık zarının yırtılm kızlık zarının yırtılm kızlık zarının şekli kızlık zarıı kızlık zaı kızlıkbozma kızlığı kızlığı bozuldu kızın götünü sikme kıç sikme lap latin sikiş videoları lik am sikiş lik am sikişi lik am sikme linkek liselilerin sikiş vide lolitaların sikiş vide lt massage indir masturbace masturbasyon kızlık mature sikiş videoları mature sikiş videosu meltem cumbul sıcak vi metacafe sıcak videola mizah mobilya msn sıcak videolar mutlaka müjde ar sıcak videola müjde ar sıcak videola mümkün müzik indir nasıl anlaşılır nasıl bozulur nasıl sikiş nicklaus nuotraukos ofiste sikiş videoları okay bekaret okay bekaret kemeri olmadan olmadan am sikme olması online erotizmi

Posted by: Kadın Sağlık on June 1, 2009 12:36 PM

Post A Comment

advertise_liberally.gif