"The Economy" Versus Your Money

An astoundingly blinkered New York Times article on why Republican candidates aren't getting more of a boost from "glowing economic statistics" takes an astounding thirty paragraphs (admittedly, many of them short) to consider the possibility that "Rather than celebrate the stock market’s gains and the overall growth of the economy, many voters are worried about the wages of ordinary workers, which have just started to improve after several years of falling short or barely keeping up with inflation."

Yes, yes, shocking but true -- typical people's perceptions of the economy are driven more by the well-being of typical people than on aggregate macroeconomic indicators. Who'd a thunk it?

Comments

How many Democrats voted for the bankruptcy bill again - 0? Or no?

Posted by: Linus on October 24, 2006 01:43 AM

odd, that.

Posted by: josh on October 24, 2006 02:36 AM

Not "of typical people" - of their own pocketbooks.

Posted by: FMguru on October 24, 2006 02:50 AM

The average 401k balance is on the order of $40,000, and not all of it invested in common stocks. The 3% rise in the Dow over six years hardly qualifies as something to get euphoric about.

Posted by: bob h on October 24, 2006 07:36 AM

Bush likely wonders where's the resulting joy seeing as how he's vastly enriched the bottom line for 1% of the population. He actually expects the remaining 99% to feel good that they too could someday be in the same boat. Talk about blinkered.

Posted by: steve duncan on October 24, 2006 07:50 AM

So why do you think this sort of thing happens?
* Is there a high level of economic illiteracy among journalists?
* Do they understand the abstract economic theory but not how it impacts regular folks?
* Is there a lack of quotable sources who can address the issue?

You're absolutely right to criticize this astonishingly bad writing. But I also wonder about its cause so that we can try and fix it.

Posted by: b on October 24, 2006 08:10 AM

i think this just highlights that "economic reporting" at most major american newspapers (the times and the post the most egregious of which) is a decided misnomer.

i think i heard npr parroting this this morning. sigh...

Posted by: looj on October 24, 2006 09:15 AM

I wonder who's actually making money.

The DJIA is up a bit in nominal dollars since Jan 2001, but is down quite a bit in constant dollars.

The NASDAQ is waaaay off in every metric.

Corporations make big profits but the profits don't impact share price? How does that work? Is it all going to pay for CEOs salaries?

Who is making money out of this economy? Is it all being sent to our Chinese and Japanese landlords?

Posted by: Jeffrey Davis on October 24, 2006 09:21 AM

"Who is making money out of this economy?"

You've seen the numbers that the top 10% are distancing themselves from the rest, the top 1% from them, the top .1% from them,... At those rarified levels, you're talking about fairly small numbers of people - tens of thousands. Lots are CEO's, some top-level big law partners, analagous medical specialists, professional athletes, top entertainers,... But clearly there aren't that many pro atheletes and entertainers making millions per year. The breakdown of the rest, and the explanation why, is the $64000 question.

Posted by: ptm on October 24, 2006 09:55 AM

Fact is, msm journalists tend to be close to the top of the income ladder. They have good health plans, good pensions, and no recent personal experience of how hard it is to make ends meet when the income is rising faster than the outgo. So they really don't share the gut feeling that most of us have that something's wrong -- and they retreat to what they do know: their own investments are doing fine, they feel pretty secure, and what the hell is wrong with the rest of us?

Posted by: PapaOscar on October 24, 2006 10:12 AM

Oops -- outgo rising faster than the income...

Posted by: PapaOscar on October 24, 2006 10:13 AM

ptm, a lot of the explanation for the success of the upper one-tenth-of-one-percent is that oligopoly reinforces itself: ceo salaries, for example, are set by comp committees of boards that include other ceos (and former ceos)....

Posted by: howard on October 24, 2006 11:42 AM

I'm guessing that PapaOscar has neither worked for the media nor known many people who have. Maybe people like Katie Couric are at the top of the income ladder, but the average newspaper grunt can't even see the top of that ladder, let alone reach it. Median salary at a mid-sized daily is around $40K a year. And that's if you're lucky enough to have a job: Virtually every newspaper is laying off staff and/or cutting back benefits.

Journalists are a lot of things. Rich ain't one of them.

Posted by: Fred App on October 24, 2006 12:14 PM

Actually, I worked for a national media company for ten years as a reporter and editor. That's where I got more experience than I wanted with the masters of the universe who cover national politics for national newspapers and magazines. By the time they got to their exalted positions, they tended to be much more comfortable with the people they covered (and the people who fund the people they covered) than they were with the rest of the working world, including the grunts in the newsroom.

In fact, that seemed to be a requirement for the job.

Posted by: PapaO on October 24, 2006 01:13 PM

I'd say thatit's the editors, particularly the senior editors, and the publishers. Nothing that a journalist writes gets into print, unless an editor approves it. I'm guessing here, but I'll bet that most journalists figure out which slants get printed, and which don't; the one who don't figure that out are known as ex-journalists.

Posted by: Barry on October 24, 2006 02:46 PM

While we're on the topic of economic reporting, don't forget about the Washington Post's endorsement of Jim Webb. It included this slap: "His diagnosis of America's widening disparities in wealth and income is on the mark, but his fuzzy-headed attacks on free trade are the wrong prescription."

It's always amusing to see media elites equate opposition to free trade with ignorance.

Their arrogance will be their downfall.

Posted by: b on October 24, 2006 04:01 PM

anent b's recent comment

I wonder where the Washington Post gets its examples of Free Trade countries. Does even Singapore practice Free Trade? The US doesn't. Not even vaguely. The Washington Post has tacitly agreed to perpetuate the code word version of Free Trade which is destroying American jobs.

Posted by: Jeffrey Davis on October 24, 2006 04:34 PM

How many Democrats voted for the bankruptcy bill again - 0? Or no?

In the Senate:
100% of Republicans voted for it.
~60% of Democrats voted against it.

In the House:
100% of Republicans voted for it.
~60% of Democrates voted against it.

The Democrats may not be perfect. But at least they're not unanimous in supporting these bills, and more importantly, if they'd been in charge this bill would never have seen the light of day.

Posted by: Mikef on October 25, 2006 04:28 PM

thankss

Posted by: indir on October 14, 2007 08:26 AM

thanksssss

Posted by: oyunlar on November 29, 2007 07:22 AM

Hello! I’m Hrvoje from Croatia, working as a web developer and reading your blog via rss feeds.

Posted by: Svetlana on December 1, 2007 04:38 AM

thankss

Posted by: wert on December 14, 2007 09:50 PM

so true. Screw semantics and validation, honestly. I have worked on very, very successful sites and never took standards into consideration. Unless you consider screen size and loading time a standard. Im so tired of hearing

www.kursun.gen.tr

Posted by: mırc on December 23, 2007 10:11 PM

so true. Screw semantics and validation, honestly. I have worked on very, very successful sites and never took standards into consideration. Unless you consider screen size and loading time a standard. Im so tired of hearing

www.mirctr.org

Posted by: mırc on December 23, 2007 10:12 PM

Hello! I’m Hrvoje from Croatia, working as a web developer and reading your blog via rss feeds.

Posted by: mirc on December 23, 2007 10:13 PM

Hello! I’m Hrvoje from Croatia, working as a web developer and reading your blog via rss feeds.

www.kelebektr.org

Posted by: kelebek on December 23, 2007 10:14 PM

thanks for all...

Posted by: hikaye on December 28, 2007 08:44 AM

thanks for all... and free word..

Posted by: sex on December 28, 2007 08:45 AM

thanks .. .

Posted by: hikaye on December 28, 2007 08:46 AM

thanks a lot..

Posted by: hikaye on December 28, 2007 08:47 AM

forever love..

Posted by: sex on December 28, 2007 08:48 AM

thanks baby.. forever work.

Posted by: mirc on December 28, 2007 08:49 AM

sex hikayeleri thanks all

Posted by: sex hikayeleri on December 28, 2007 04:56 PM

seks hikayerleri thanks all

Posted by: seks hikayeleri on December 28, 2007 04:56 PM

Ohhh may god ! :D:D very good ! youtube

Posted by: youtube on January 2, 2008 12:58 PM

nice

Posted by: dima on March 24, 2008 03:55 AM

sadasasdsadasddas

Posted by: seks shop on April 10, 2008 07:27 AM

sadsdfsdkasd mdhedwejusdjdnsadşnsanddjadhhdA

Posted by: sex shop on April 10, 2008 07:28 AM

Thank you.

Posted by: Rize on April 13, 2008 05:17 PM

Thanks

Posted by: Oriflame on May 11, 2008 08:04 PM

Thank you

Posted by: Oriflame Kozmetik on May 11, 2008 08:05 PM

Thanks

Posted by: Forum on May 11, 2008 08:07 PM

Thank you

Posted by: Sohbet on May 11, 2008 08:08 PM

Thanks

Posted by: samsun on November 4, 2008 05:43 PM

harbiarkadas.com
harbiarkadas.net
harbiarkadas.org
itirafet.org
ebedava.net
elektronikmarket.net
ameribress.com
clitoriacream.net
superspenisbuyutucu.com
megabress.com
rednightperformans.com
performansartirici.com
penisplus.tv
penispluspenisbuyutucu.com
penispluspenisbuyutucu.net
cinselmerkez.com
aseks.net
erotikcamasirlar.com
vajinatr.com
bakirevajina.com
cinselkozmetik.com
kozmetikmedikel.com
eturknet.com
tecavuz.net
yutuvideo.com
ponotubesex.com
laraperuk.com
sackanagimerkezi.com
peruksa.com
perukmarket.com
aseks.com
aloveshop.com
erotikgiyim.com
geciktiricispreyler.com
geciktiricihap.com
geciktiriciler.com
azdirici.com
bayanuyarici.com
fntazialemi.com
fantaziservisi.om
cinselmazemeler.com
cinselfantaziurunleri.com
erotikdakikalar.com
erotikmarketiniz.com
seksmarketiniz.com
sekshatlari.com
erotikdergiler.com
erotikderginiz.com
penisbuyutucuviprx.com
penisbuyutucuvigrx.com
penisbuyutuculer.com
vigrxpenisbuyutucu.com
sismebebekler.com
sismebebekshop.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
elektronikmarket.net
ebedava.net
kontortr.com
elaydin23.com
turkcellkontorcu.com
aveakontoral.com
vodafonekontoral.com
toptankontorcu.com
cinselkozmetik.com
bayanpartnerler.com
erkekpartnerler.com
kizarkadaslar.com
yonjaarkadas.com
siberalem-siberalem.com
sexpartnerler.com
sekspartnerler.com
erotikpartnerler.com
gencyuz.com
erkekarkadaslar.com
bayanarkadaslar.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
baskahaber.com
medikalkozmetik.net
kozmetikmedikal.com
zayiflamavediyet.net
zayiflamahapii.com
zayiflamabandii.com
kilovertr.com
zayiflamatr.net
diyettr.com
toksinbandi.net
botoxtr.com
botokstr.com
selulittedavii.com
selulitgiderici.net
selulitkremii.com
catlaktedavisii.com
catlakgiderici.net
catlakkremii.com

penis büyütücü

Posted by: sexshop on November 7, 2008 06:19 AM

tskler saolun abiler

Posted by: sesli sohbet on November 23, 2008 06:20 AM

Post A Comment

advertise_liberally.gif