Sign of the Times

Veteran congressman Jim Leach (R-IA) went down to defeat in the massacre of 2006. I'm no apologist for "moderate Republicans" but it is worth saying that Leach was, in my estimation, fairly clearly the best House Republican. Nevertheless, one can only be thrilled with his defeat. That it happened just goes to show how fundamentally rotten the whole GOP scene had become. Leach was, in many ways, a person possessed of genuinely decent instincts and some fundamentally sound ideas about how the United States should conduct itself in the world.

Nevertheless, in practice he was useless. His presence in the congress did the world no good whatsoever. He'd be more valuable as a professional talking head or stashed away in some think tank somewhere. Whether his total inability to affect the direction of the country was due to a lack of personal courage and savvy, or simply a consequence of the structure of contemporary American conservative politics I couldn't really say. But useless is what he'd become, and a Democratic vote in the House will be useful. Chuck Hagel, who's very much the Jim Leach of the Senate, ought to take a good, hard look at this -- he, like Leach, has for years now been saying many good things and doing essentially no good at all. Unless he can find a way to actually impact the country, he'll deserve to land in the ash heap of history every bit as much as Leach did.

Comments

It's good to see you embracing progressivism more fully, now that we've started winning, Matt. Don't leave us when the greedheads enjoy a resurgence.

Posted by: dj moonbat on November 8, 2006 02:26 AM

It's good to see you embracing progressivism more fully, now that we've started winning, Matt.

Dude, I wrote the aforelinked article on the evils of moderate republicans in July 2005 when progressives certainly weren't winning. Progressive politics is doing better because people have moved their views to the left, there aren't people moving left because progressives are winning.

Posted by: Matthew Yglesias on November 8, 2006 02:37 AM

CNN is reporting that Ms. McCaskill just won in Missouri.

All we need now is President Gray Davis, Attorney General Jerry Brown, and a nationwide ban on smoking in public and the New Age will have arrived.

Posted by: Linus on November 8, 2006 02:40 AM

Dude, I've been reading your stuff for a long time--long before 2005. You're a real bright guy, and your temptation to forge good arguments leads you away from the progressive fold sometimes when you might want to settle for chewing on the reasons for why the conventional progressive wisdom has become so conventional.

Just don't become Mike Kinsley, I guess I'm sayin'. You're going to be presented with the opportunity to be big time, I'd say; it'd be a shame if your contrarianism morphed into that.

Posted by: dj moonbat on November 8, 2006 02:42 AM

Sing along!

A little bit of Nancy in my life
A little bit of Debbie by my side
A little bit of Amy is all I need
A little bit of Maria is what I see
A little bit of Jennifer in the sun
A little bit of Claire all night long
A little bit of Hillary here I am

A little bit of you makes me your man

http://tinyurl.com/y98x7n

Posted by: Lou Bega on November 8, 2006 02:51 AM

Forging good arguments is not a temptation, it is a necessity.
Yglesias hasn't been presented with anything he has worked for it by consitently writing good pieces.

Posted by: Matt's mom on November 8, 2006 02:55 AM

Forging good arguments is not a temptation, it is a necessity.

No, if you're actually committed to a cause, you're well-advised to restrict yourself to those arguments that support your side. Otherwise, you're a gun for hire with good arguments.

Posted by: dj moonbat on November 8, 2006 02:57 AM

So you support making bogus arguements if it supports your side?
Maybe you are really dj wingnut

Posted by: support us on November 8, 2006 03:20 AM

So you support making bogus arguements [sic] if it supports your side?

Sure. But I'm a lawyer; it's my job.

But good arguments are surprisingly easy to come up with, and Matt used to revel in tweaking the left as a way to ingratiate himself with other "thinkers." Then he discovered, at least in the case of the war, that Lo! and Behold! he was fucking wrong.

But I'm happy to be a wingnut.

Posted by: dj moonbat on November 8, 2006 03:25 AM

Matt's the real thing, he has integrity. He's shed any elements of that TNR / Harvard "contrarian" points-scoring he once had, and he's straight up apologized for his long ago pro-war views (something none of the older, more famous pro-war pundits have done). For years now he's been pounding on the more popular hypocrisies and stupidities of the split-the-difference "moderates", he's been devastating on the "anti-anti-war" crowd. His recent work especially has shown a willingness to question a lot of the underlying assumptions of U.S. militarism. On this blog in particular he's been courageous, honest, and more than willing to question our current rotten "centrist" conventional wisdom.

Sure, I think he'll get famous someday. But that will be a GOOD thing. He hasn't tried to sell out yet, and I don't think he will in the future.

Posted by: MQ on November 8, 2006 03:41 AM

I am drunk. Matthew for umpteen years has been brilliant, and benevolent, but now MY is relevant. No more intercepting and deflecting the bad stuff, now some good things can happen. There will be pain and failure, but god bless opportunity. These are now times of possibility. Good luck.

Posted by: bob mcmanus on November 8, 2006 03:43 AM

On the subject of Leach and not of Yglesias's illustrious career, Matt must be too young to remember Leach's infamous role at the beginning of the Whitewater "scandal." As chair of (I believe) the House Banking Committee, he was a water-carrier for the most loathsome elements of his party. In fact, his "moderate" image and demeanor gave the "scandal" an impact that it plainly did not deserve. People with longer memories are very, very glad to see him gone, finally.

Posted by: k on November 8, 2006 06:40 AM

My own Rep. (Gilchrist in MD)is another one of the rare decent Republicans. But as you say, his moderate stances on issues were practically meaningless. It's nice he voted against the torture bill, but it didn't matter. By caucusing with the GOP, his one important vote was for the wrong side.

My hope is that now the House is in Democratic hands, he and whatever other moderate Republicans are still left will now actually matter a little more, since they might be willing to cross the aisle and help support some legislation that the Dem side brings forward.

Posted by: Doug T on November 8, 2006 07:25 AM

K has it right. I went to one of Leach's town hall meetings in Iowa City during the Whitewater investigation. Leach was continually peppered w/ questions of what was the point of the investigation (it had being going on for a while w/ most of the relevant info having been determined). All he kept saying (paraphrasing) was "Wait there is more and it will prove the Clintons nefarious deeds." He was a sanctimonious ass. Glad he's gone.

Posted by: David on November 8, 2006 07:35 AM

I'm afraid you've been misled by spin. Leach and Hagel are very different animals.

Leach was THE left-most Republican in the House, the Republican most likely to vote with Democrats. Not all that often -- he was still a good Republican -- but often enough to support your point.

In contrast, Hagel may talk like a centrist, he votes as a mainstream conservative. His record puts him square in the middle of today's Senate Republicans (a group that is itself very conservative by historical standards).

For example, Hagel votes much more conservative than John McCain, who nobody calls a centrist.

Watch what they do, not what they say.

Posted by: pireader on November 8, 2006 07:37 AM

>>Matt must be too young to remember Leach's infamous role at the beginning of the Whitewater "scandal." As chair of (I believe) the House Banking Committee, he was a water-carrier for the most loathsome elements of his party.

Amen. When Henry Reuss (D-WI) was chairman of Hosue Banking Leach sabotaged a financial institution reform bill that would have precluded the Savings & Loan mess.

Posted by: chefrad on November 8, 2006 08:54 AM

>>Matt must be too young to remember Leach's infamous role at the beginning of the Whitewater "scandal." As chair of (I believe) the House Banking Committee, he was a water-carrier for the most loathsome elements of his party.

Amen. When Henry Reuss (D-WI) was chairman of Hosue Banking Leach sabotaged a financial institution reform bill that would have precluded the Savings & Loan mess.

Posted by: chefrad on November 8, 2006 08:55 AM

Yes, Leach is a good fellow. I have met him and he is the real deal. BUT, he was an ENABLER. His vote helped put the thugs who have run the House for a dozen years in power. As such, despite all of his good qualities, he had to go.

Posted by: old gold on November 8, 2006 10:12 AM

I agree with this post, with "Sherwood Boehlert" in the place of "Jim Leach". It would have been sad to see Boehlert lose this year...fortunately he retired with dignity after becoming totally disgusted with his party's leaders.

Posted by: Cryptic Ned on November 8, 2006 10:37 AM

If by lack of personal courage and savvy you mean unwilling to engage in dirty, no-holds-barred, power-grabbing politics, than you are correct about Leach. Leach became "useless" as the Republican leadership became dominated by uberpartisan, power-hungry, corrupt politicians. This is not a knock on Leach, it is a knock on the path the Republican Party has taken. The Leach-Loebsack race was civil and issue-oriented, and should stand as an example of how political contests should be fought. That said, us liberals in Johnson County just couldn't stand being represented any longer by someone with an "R" behind his name.

Posted by: Paul on November 8, 2006 10:40 AM

Leach's defeat is sweet. He was one of the jihadists who went after the Clintons for the Whitewater pseudo scandal.

I am sure the Clintons are celebrating.

Posted by: Nan on November 8, 2006 11:51 AM

Beyond what you've said about Leach, he was also the last moderate GOP House member outside the northeast. Following the 2002 defeat of Connie Morella -- the last liberal Republican anywhere -- this truly brings us to the end of an era.

Posted by: penalcolony on November 8, 2006 02:58 PM

Dude, I wrote the aforelinked article on the evils of moderate republicans in July 2005 when progressives certainly weren't winning. Progressive politics is doing better because people have moved their views to the left, there aren't people moving left because progressives are winning. Posted by: Matthew Yglesias

Democrats, progressive or otherwise, did not win so much last night as the Republicans lost. If "progressives" had somehow convinced Americans that their way was the better way, you wouldn't have had candidates like Tester winning in Montana, whose distinguishing political characteristic seems to be is that he's never taken money from Jack Abramoff. Otherwise, being anti-gay, anti-abortion and pro-gun, how is he substantially different from Burns?

I realize this is just one race. But if progressivism was really on the march, you'd have seen a change in Texas, more change in Ohio and Michigan, and a complete shits like Sessenbrenner and Lott looking at retirement next January.

Posted by: Jeff II on November 8, 2006 02:58 PM

The result of the political genius's corrupt, divisive tactics: “Bush’s Brain” meltdown. Karl who?

Posted by: Madison Guy on November 8, 2006 04:39 PM

I think Leach was well aware his time had come. I think he was running this time more out of habit than anything else. On accepting defeat, he stated something along the lines that "this is the happiest day of my life."

Posted by: SRin Iowa on November 8, 2006 04:58 PM

In Michigan, you weren't going to see any more Democrats win than did win. Only the open seat in the MI-7th could have been taken. The rest of the GOP Congressional seats in Michigan were quite safe incumbents, including Hoekstra. In the 7th, Dem. Sharon Renier, a fricking organic farmer for pete's sake, lost by about 5-6 pts to a sanctimonious "preacher" named Tim Walberg in a solidly Republican district, despite a budget comprised of bottle return funds and change found in her sofa. And I mean that -- she had less than $2,000 on hand the week before the election, and couldn't afford a campaign. I firmly believe that, with $50,000 from the party, we'd have this seat.

So there was something afoot here -- Democrats DID win as much as the GOP lost.

The GOP became unhinged from reality, as evidenced by a thousand issues, and the voters unhinged them from Congress. Simply being literate and familiar with basic principles of science did a lot to help the Democrats.

Posted by: Scot S W on November 8, 2006 05:11 PM

I'll never forget the sanctimonious Jim Leach, clad in his homey sweater, leading the charge to impeach Bill Clinton, all the while claiming to be the voice of reason. I was ashamed to be from the same state. (cue the Dixie Chicks)

Good riddance!

Posted by: Randi G on November 9, 2006 01:12 PM

I'll never forget the sanctimonious Jim Leach, clad in his homey sweater, leading the charge to impeach Bill Clinton, all the while claiming to be the voice of reason.

Yes. Leach had been on the right side of some important issues over the years, includng world hunger/poverty issues.

But his behavior leading the charge for impeachment was disgracefully smug, and unfathomably aggressive. I have never forgotten it. I have never forgiven him. And I was delighted to see him go down on Tuesday.
.

Posted by: Gee on November 9, 2006 01:53 PM

Jim was one of only a few decent Republicans in the House, but as others have said, had little power to change the course of his conservative fellow party memebers. Leach never took a dime from a PAC. His personal fortune was acquired from his family, that owns Adel and Trachtenberg Plumbing in the Quad Cities, not from political payoffs. I have known Jim for 30+ years and his defeat, while sad, was inevitable. Had he challenged Jim Nussle a few years ago when redistricting put both of them in the same district, rather than moving to Iowa City, he most likely would have survived Tuesday's Republican conflaguration. Jim's only real lapse was not opposing the impeachment of Bill Clinton. I only hope his successor is as ethical as Jim is. If Bush was smart, he would dump Condi Rice, and appoint Jim either Secretary of State, or make him his National Security Advisor. He will not switch parties, but his beliefs are much more in line with Democrats than today's Republicans.

Posted by: Miles W. Rich on November 10, 2006 12:03 AM

The politics of Kansas is very strange and difficult to predict. Few pundits predicted the demise of the great Jim Leach. The only Republican to vote against the war is tossed out with the tide of citizen anger against that war! I think you are right though, why Leach persistently stayed with the Republican party, given his voting record, is very hard to understand, and certainly he would have very little influence in a party of ideologs.

Posted by: Alan Tufft on November 10, 2006 01:24 AM

To Alan, you need to check you facts before you type. Jim Leach was the congressman for District 2 of Iowa. Kansas politics are irrelevant to this argument. And the reason that Leach stayed with the Republicans is the exact same reason that he is such a maverick in the party. As someone who worked for him as an intern, I was amazed at how Leach always acted for what he thought was in the best interest of the common good, and always voted as his concience dictated. The fact is, is while he disagrees with aspects of the Republican party, he disagrees with even more about the Democratic party. Leach was one of the last examples of a politician with true integrity and for that reason regardless of party affiliation, we all should be sad to see him go.

Posted by: Ann Gevock on November 20, 2006 03:53 AM

four you thanks flowers

Posted by: çiçek gönder on August 30, 2007 08:51 AM

Chat

Posted by: Chat on September 11, 2007 07:43 PM

It's good to see you embracing progressivism more fully, now that we've started winning, Matt. Don't leave us when the greedheads enjoy a resurgence.

Posted by: youtube.oku.gen.tr on September 21, 2007 09:45 AM

It's good to see you embracing progressivism more fully, now that we've started winning, Matt.

Dude, I wrote the aforelinked article on the evils of moderate republicans in July 2005 when progressives certainly weren't winning. Progressive politics is doing better because people have moved their views to the left, there aren't people moving left because progressives are winning.

Posted by: 89 on September 21, 2007 09:46 AM

So you support making bogus arguements [sic] if it supports your side?

Sure. But I'm a lawyer; it's my job.

But good arguments are surprisingly easy to come up with, and Matt used to revel in tweaking the left as a way to ingratiate himself with other "thinkers." Then he discovered, at least in the case of the war, that Lo! and Behold! he was fucking wrong.

But I'm happy to be a wingnut.

Posted by: 89.com on September 21, 2007 09:47 AM

K has it right. I went to one of Leach's town hall meetings in Iowa City during the Whitewater investigation. Leach was continually peppered w/ questions of what was the point of the investigation (it had being going on for a while w/ most of the relevant info having been determined). All he kept saying (paraphrasing) was "Wait there is more and it will prove the Clintons nefarious deeds." He was a sanctimonious ass. Glad he's gone.

Posted by: redtube on September 21, 2007 09:48 AM

Matt must be too young to remember Leach's infamous role at the beginning of the Whitewater "scandal." As chair of (I believe) the House Banking Committee, he was a water-carrier for the most loathsome elements of his party.

Amen. When Henry Reuss (D-WI) was chairman of Hosue Banking Leach sabotaged a financial institution reform bill that would have precluded the Savings & Loan mess.

Posted by: youporn on September 21, 2007 09:49 AM

ankara flowers shop

Posted by: ankara çiçekçi on October 6, 2007 07:15 AM

Good comment.Thanks admin.

Posted by: youtube on November 16, 2007 01:48 PM

sohbet sitesi :)

Posted by: sohbet on November 29, 2007 02:08 AM

thnks all a lat of...

Posted by: seks hikayeleri on January 8, 2008 02:03 PM

thanks all

Posted by: hikaye on January 8, 2008 02:05 PM

thanks all

Posted by: mırc on January 8, 2008 09:59 PM

thanksss

Posted by: oyun indir on January 11, 2008 11:42 AM

Ataşehir Çiçekçi -
Altunizade Çiçekçi -
Acıbadem Çiçekçi -
Aşağı dudullu Çiçekçi -
Altıntepe Çiçekçi -
Anadolu Hisarı Çiçekçi -
Altkaynarca Çiçekçi -
Altayçeşme Çiçekçi -
Atakent Çiçekçi -
Başıbüyük Çiçekçi -
Bağlarbaşı Çiçekçi -
Bulgurlu Çiçekçi -
Bahariye Çiçekçi -
Bakkalköy Çiçekçi -
Beykoz Çiçekçi -
Beylerbeyi Çiçekçi -
Bostancı Çiçekçi -
Bulgurlu Çiçekçi -
Burgazada Çiçekçi -
Burhaniye Çiçekçi -
Büyükada Çiçekçi -
Caddebostan Çiçekçi -
Çubuklu Çiçekçi -
Çekmeköy Çiçekçi -
Çengelköy Çiçekçi -
Çiftehevuzlar Çiçekçi -
Çamlıca Çiçekçi -
Çakmak Çiçekçi -
Erenköy Çiçekçi -
Esatpaşa Çiçekçi -
Esenkent Çiçekçi -
Feneryolu Çiçekçi -
Fikirtepe Çiçekçi -
Fenerbahce Çiçekçi -
Göztepe Çiçekçi -
İstanbul Çiçekçi -
Harbiye Çiçekçi -
Hasanpaşa Çiçekçi -
Haydarpaşa Çiçekçi -
Harem Çiçekçi -
Rahmanlar Çiçekçi -
Suadiye Çiçekçi -
Sarıgazi Çiçekçi -
Küçüksu Çiçekçi -
Koşuyolu Çiçekçi -
Kuleli Çiçekçi -
Kurfalı Çiçekçi -
Küçükyalı Çiçekçi -
Kurtköy Çiçekçi -
Kartal Çiçekçi -
Kozyatağı Çiçekçi -
Kızıltoprak Çiçekçi -
Kalamış Çiçekçi -
Kuzguncuk Çiçekçi -
Kandilli Çiçekçi -
Kavacık Çiçekçi -
Kayışdağı Çiçekçi -
Kısıklı Çiçekçi -
Kazasker Çiçekçi -
Merdivenköy Çiçekçi -
Maltepe Çiçekçi -
Moda Çiçekçi -
Paşabahçe Çiçekçi -
Pendik Çiçekçi -
Samandıra Çiçekçi -
Soğanlı Çiçekçi -
Soğanlık Çiçekçi -
Soğuksu Çiçekçi -
Selamiçeşme Çiçekçi -
Sahreyıcedid Çiçekçi -
Sultanbeyli Çiçekçi -
Selimiye Çiçekçi -
Şaşkınbakkal Çiçekçi -
Tüccarbaşı Çiçekçi -
Tuzla Çiçekçi -
Üsküdar Çiçekçi -
Ünalan Çiçekçi -
Ümraniye Çiçekçi -
Üst Kanarca Çiçekçi -
Yakacık Çiçekçi -
Yenisahra Çiçekçi -
Yavuztürk Çiçekçi -
Yukarı dudullu Çiçekçi -
Ziverbey
Akatlar Çiçekçi -
Arnavutköy Çiçekçi -
Akaretler Çiçekçi -
Aksaray Çiçekçi -
Ataköy Çiçekçi -
Ayazağa Çiçekçi -
Ayazma Çiçekçi -
Aydınevler Çiçekçi -
Beşiktaş Çiçekçi -
Bahçelievler Çiçekçi -
Bakırköy Çiçekçi -
Bahçekapı Çiçekçi -
Balmumcu Çiçekçi -
Baltalimanı Çiçekçi -
Bayrampaşa Çiçekçi -
Bebek Çiçekçi -
Beyazıt Çiçekçi -
Beyoğlu Çiçekçi -
Büyükdere Çiçekçi -
Cağaloğlu Çiçekçi -
Cerrahpaşa Çiçekçi -
Cevizli Çiçekçi -
Cihangir Çiçekçi -
Çağlayan Çiçekçi -
Çeliktepe Çiçekçi -
Çağlayan Çiçekçi -
Cevizlibağ Çiçekçi -
Çapa Çiçekçi -
Dikilitaş Çiçekçi -
Dragos Çiçekçi -
Edirnekapı Çiçekçi -
Etiler Çiçekçi -
Elmadağ Çiçekçi -
Eminönü Çiçekçi -
Emirgan Çiçekçi -
Esentepe Çiçekçi -
Eyüp Çiçekçi -
Fatih Çiçekçi -
Feriköy Çiçekçi -
Fındıklı Çiçekçi -
Fındıkzade Çiçekçi -
Firuzköy Çiçekçi -
Fulya Çiçekçi -
Galatasaray Çiçekçi -
Gayrettepe Çiçekçi -
Gaziosmanpaşa Çiçekçi -
Gülsuyu Çiçekçi -
Gültepe Çiçekçi -
Gümüşsuyu Çiçekçi -
İstinye Çiçekçi -
Kabataş Çiçekçi -
Kanlıca Çiçekçi -
Karaköy Çiçekçi -
Kasımpaşa Çiçekçi -
Kurtuluş Çiçekçi -
Kuştepe Çiçekçi -
Levent Çiçekçi -
Maçka Çiçekçi -
Maslak Çiçekçi -
Merter Çiçekçi -
Mecidiyeköy Çiçekçi -
Nişantaşı Çiçekçi -
Nakkaştepe Çiçekçi -
Ortaçeşme Çiçekçi -
Okmeydanı Çiçekçi -
Osmanbey Çiçekçi -
Ortaköy Çiçekçi -
Pangaltı Çiçekçi -
Seyrantepe Çiçekçi -
Sirkeci Çiçekçi -
İncirli Çiçekçi -
Sultanahmet Çiçekçi -
Şişli Çiçekçi -
Taksim Çiçekçi -
Topkapı Çiçekçi -
Tahtakale Çiçekçi -
Tarabya Çiçekçi -
Teşvikiye Çiçekçi -
Topselvi Çiçekçi -
Tozkoparan Çiçekçi -
Yeşilköy Çiçekçi -
Yeşilyurt Çiçekçi -
Zetinburnu Çiçekçi

Posted by: çiçekçi on January 12, 2008 03:21 AM

thanks regard.s..

Posted by: sex shop on January 12, 2008 01:30 PM

thanks regards..

Posted by: sex on January 12, 2008 01:33 PM

thanks baby.

Posted by: porno on January 12, 2008 01:39 PM

thanks regards.

Posted by: hikaye on January 12, 2008 01:41 PM

thnx..

Posted by: mirc on January 12, 2008 01:43 PM

thanks regard.

Posted by: elektronik sigara on January 12, 2008 01:44 PM

thnx. reg..

Posted by: elektronik sigara on January 12, 2008 01:46 PM

Thank you...

Posted by: film indir on January 12, 2008 08:50 PM

I like html emails today with faster internet connections normal emails are extremely boring.

Posted by: oyun indir on January 13, 2008 12:50 PM

thanks fol all

Posted by: bolsohbet on January 29, 2008 06:32 AM

thanks

Posted by: chat on January 29, 2008 06:33 AM

Matthew Yglesias _ proudly eponymous since 2002 8ı7

Posted by: prefabrik on March 27, 2008 09:41 AM

thanks ;)

Posted by: firefox indir on March 31, 2008 04:00 AM

thank you

Posted by: dis beyazlatma on April 4, 2008 04:35 PM

Thank you..

Posted by: Rize on April 13, 2008 05:20 PM

teşekkürler yararlı bir yazı olmuş bloğunu takip ediyorum.
Turkey ;)

Posted by: cep program, symbian program on May 5, 2008 02:07 AM

thanks. :D:D

Posted by: sohbet on August 29, 2008 09:23 AM

harbiarkadas.com
harbiarkadas.net
harbiarkadas.org
itirafet.org
ebedava.net
elektronikmarket.net
ameribress.com
clitoriacream.net
superspenisbuyutucu.com
megabress.com
rednightperformans.com
performansartirici.com
penisplus.tv
penispluspenisbuyutucu.com
penispluspenisbuyutucu.net
cinselmerkez.com
aseks.net
erotikcamasirlar.com
vajinatr.com
bakirevajina.com
cinselkozmetik.com
kozmetikmedikel.com
eturknet.com
tecavuz.net
yutuvideo.com
ponotubesex.com
laraperuk.com
sackanagimerkezi.com
peruksa.com
perukmarket.com
aseks.com
aloveshop.com
erotikgiyim.com
geciktiricispreyler.com
geciktiricihap.com
geciktiriciler.com
azdirici.com
bayanuyarici.com
fntazialemi.com
fantaziservisi.om
cinselmazemeler.com
cinselfantaziurunleri.com
erotikdakikalar.com
erotikmarketiniz.com
seksmarketiniz.com
sekshatlari.com
erotikdergiler.com
erotikderginiz.com
penisbuyutucuviprx.com
penisbuyutucuvigrx.com
penisbuyutuculer.com
vigrxpenisbuyutucu.com
sismebebekler.com
sismebebekshop.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
elektronikmarket.net
ebedava.net
kontortr.com
elaydin23.com
turkcellkontorcu.com
aveakontoral.com
vodafonekontoral.com
toptankontorcu.com
cinselkozmetik.com
bayanpartnerler.com
erkekpartnerler.com
kizarkadaslar.com
yonjaarkadas.com
siberalem-siberalem.com
sexpartnerler.com
sekspartnerler.com
erotikpartnerler.com
gencyuz.com
erkekarkadaslar.com
bayanarkadaslar.com
yemekeviniz.com
sanalmarketiniz.com
baskahaber.com
medikalkozmetik.net
kozmetikmedikal.com
zayiflamavediyet.net
zayiflamahapii.com
zayiflamabandii.com
kilovertr.com
zayiflamatr.net
diyettr.com
toksinbandi.net
botoxtr.com
botokstr.com
selulittedavii.com
selulitgiderici.net
selulitkremii.com
catlaktedavisii.com
catlakgiderici.net
catlakkremii.com

Posted by: sexshop on November 4, 2008 04:35 AM

Thanks

Posted by: samsun on November 4, 2008 05:41 PM

Post A Comment