Cavalier

Richard Just at The New Republic is "a little disturbed by the cavalier attitude some liberals have taken towards the prospect of a nuclear Iran". Ah, good, I'm incredibly disturbed by the cavalier attitude warmongers have taken to the truth. Just writes:

As plenty of others have noted (see this TNR Online piece), Ahmadinejad isn't exactly the only member of the Iranian regime who would like to see Israel destroyed. Even a so-called moderate, former president Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, famously said, of a nuclear attack against Israel, "It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality." So maybe it's true that Khamenei is taking power back from Ahmadinejad.

I wonder whether or not Just is deliberately trying to mislead his readers about this. Anyways, here's what Efraim Karsh and Rory Miller wrote about Rafsanjani:

>The next year, former Iranian president Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, widely regarded as a pragmatist, noted that Israel was more vulnerable to nuclear attack than Muslim countries "because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything." Then he added, "It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality."

The fact of the matter is that no matter how many times The New Republic truncates that Rafsanjani quotation, it's still the case that he was talking about deterring Israel's nuclear arsenal and not launching an Iranian first strike.

Be that as it may, at the end of the day, I do not only the Iranian nuclear program as such, but also the larger issue of the slow disintegration of the global nonproliferation regime, extremely seriously as a policy problem. Which is precisely why it's so crucial to combat the horribly misguided "counterproliferation" school that was behind the Iraq War, and to fight against the view that sporadic unilateral military strikes are anything but counterproductive in achieving nonproliferation goals. Peter Scoblic's 2005 New Republic article "Moral Hazard" is probably the best relatively brief statement of why the "bombs away!" approach to dealing with these problems only makes the problems worse and worse.

Comments

Cripes, TNR is scary. Ackerman's well out of it.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on January 20, 2007 11:20 AM

matty,

I don't know how many time's I need to over this with you and you're readers.

1. ISLAM IS THE REGION OF PIECE

2. MISLAMS ARE VERY VERY HOLY PEOPLE (SUPERIOR TO OTHER'S)

3. DHIMMIS LIKE YOU AND ME ARE DOG'S BEFOUR MISLAMS

4. THE EARTH BELONG TO MISLAMS

5. ISLAM IS THE REGION OF PIECE

6. MISLAMS HAVE MADE SO MANY GRATE ACCOMPLISHMINTS FOR MAN KIND.

7. MISLAMS WOULD NEVER TRY TO HURT INNOCENT BY STANDDERS -- THAT IS WHY IRAN'S NUCLEAR RESEARCH IS FOR ENERGY NOT WEAPON'S

8. EVEN IF IRAN HAD NUCLEAR WEAPON'S = THAT WOULD BE THE SAVEST PLACE. MISLAMS ARE WISE CUSTODIANS FOR SUCH TECHNOLOGIE. DO YOU SERIOUSLY THING A MISLIM NASHION LIKE IRAN WOULD RUNE HER PLANET BY USING NUCLEAR WEAPON'S???? ARE YOU CARZY?

9. THE FALSE NASHION OF ISRAEL CAUSE ALL THE PROBLEM'S IN THE MIDDLE EAST.

10. WHEN THE MISLAMS TAKE BACK THEY'RE LAND FROM THE FALSE NASHION OF ISRAEL, I AM SHURE THEY WILL BE MUCH MORE MERCY FULL THAN THE ISRAELIS HAVE BEEN TO THE MISLAMS.

WHen you neocons go to learn????


Posted by: hillary for president on January 20, 2007 11:25 AM

Hillaryforpres, if you're going to make fun of the other side by pretending to be a retarded version of their supporters, try a little harder, please. Jesus' General does it a lot better. Your version neither makes anyone laugh nor changes minds.

Posted by: Dr. Anatole Gavage-Huskanoy on January 20, 2007 11:31 AM

Matt,
A few points:

First, even the Iranian leadership do not intend to destroy Israel, Israelis can legitimately worry that if Iran acquires a nuclear capability it may change its intentions in the future.

Second, the more fissile material available, particularly in dysfunction states, the greater the risk of inadvertent leakage of non state actors.

Third, I think what some liberal hawks are angered by is the refusal of many other liberals to countenance tough action, not just negotiations. My question to you is: ruling out the use of force, what would you use as a stick if negotiations were to fail (or as a stick to advance negotiations). For example, would you agree to a blockade to take iranian oil off the world market. This would hurt us but it would also hurt Iran more and probably force it to back down. I think this could work and is a sensible middle ground Democrats could coalesce around but do you?

Finally, I agree with you on the worrisome decline of the NPT but the roots of this decline are unclear. The US has certainly failed in part but there is little evidence that the transgressions of the nuclear haves is linked to the transgressions of Iran and the DPRK. Certainly, Iran has said that a restoration of the 13 stepts outlined at the 2000 Rev Con would not affect its own decision making calculus.

Posted by: pt on January 20, 2007 11:33 AM

It's scary/sad that there are so many merely rhetorical attacks on liberals from the Right. When one launches a merely rhetorical attack, one knows it.

Posted by: Jeffrey Davis on January 20, 2007 11:52 AM

How irrational are we assuming Iran's leadership is, that they would consider a nuclear attack on Israel?

You can tell even conservatives realize such an attack is absolutely implausible when they resort to talk of Ahmadinejad being a cultish millenialist. They obviously have to invent the myth that the guy is batshit insane to get anyone to take their claims seriously.

Posted by: cg on January 20, 2007 11:54 AM

If Iraq hasn't made these people blush with all their talk of "muscular action" and so forth, will anything?

I see little concrete reason to think that Iran has a policy of developing an offensive nuclear capacity, little reason to think that they'd be particularly near developing such a capacity even if it were their intent, and little reason to think it would prove more irresponsible a nuclear power than, say, Pakistan if it became one.

After Iraq, warmongers should be the ones operating from first principles, rather than painting their opponents as effete ostriches. Demonstrate that there's real reason to think Iran has an offensive nuclear weapons program, that they're serious about it, and that it would pose a true threat to America or American allies, and I'll listen. I'll still think that we really might want to think about, say, talking to the Iranian government before getting all "muscular," though.

Posted by: guy on January 20, 2007 12:03 PM

Israelis can legitimately worry that if Iran acquires a nuclear capability it may change its intentions in the future.

If the glosses of D'Souza's book are correct, some believe that Israelis might "legitimately worry" that Iran's intentions may change with the increase in availability of American porn. Simple use of the word "legitimate" doesn't make it a big worry, or one that the US need pay heed.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on January 20, 2007 12:10 PM

OK, I'm the one that doesn't care if Iran builds nukes.

As a matter of fact, the more time goes by the less I care about non-proliferation and the better the idea of just handing them out to everyone on the planet.

Posted by: Ed Marshall on January 20, 2007 12:16 PM

Cool! A post and a puzzle in one! I think the missing word is "view".

Reminds me of tests we had in college. But the missing words then were a little longer.

Posted by: serial catowner on January 20, 2007 12:19 PM

I tried to suggest to him over there that he is being intentionally disingenuous with the Khamenei/Ahmadinejad thing, too (besides foolhardy about our prospects for attacking yet another nation). Khamanei has the power here, like he always has; Ahmadinejad is blowing smoke. There's been no transfer of power, nor is Ahmadinejad properly called part of any "regime". He's a figurehead there, and the clerical establishment holds the true power. Just knows this.

Posted by: jfaberuiuc on January 20, 2007 12:25 PM

of course Just is deliberately trying to mislead his readers. the question is whether that arises from his deliberate desire to mislead himself, from marty peretz' deliberate desire to mislead readers, or plain old stupidity.

Posted by: howard on January 20, 2007 12:29 PM

Third, I think what some liberal hawks are angered by is the refusal of many other liberals to countenance tough action, not just negotiations.

I'll be slightly more into the concept of military action once I see that we have actually attempted to negotiate. None of this 'agree to everything we want, then we'll talk' bullshit.

Posted by: daveNYC on January 20, 2007 01:09 PM

Even if we say that Ahmedenijad has the power, what concrete reason is there to think he's near on acquiring weapons or that he'd use them if he had them? Even his "wipe Israel off the map" stuff appears to have been a mistranslation of some rather tepid rhetoric, along the lines of taking the Axis of Evil speech as a threat to nuke North Korea and Iran.

The hawks on this really need to come up with some actual evidence that Iran is doing something illegal or worth gettin bothered about. So much as an actual reason to think Iran has bad intentions would be nice.

Posted by: guy on January 20, 2007 01:26 PM

I think what some liberal hawks are angered by is the refusal of many other liberals to countenance tough action, not just negotiations.

What I am angered by is the failure of "liberal" hawks to provide any reason to think that any consequence of doing nothing would be worse than the likely consequences of war on Iran. There's no excuse for ignoring those likely consequences now that we've seen how the war on Iraq turned out, and though I'd rather Iran not have nuclear weapons I can't see how their getting weapons would end up worse than another such mess.

And don't say "We can't rule out the use of force because we need the threat as a stick for negotiations." The threat of the use of force worked fine in getting Saddam to readmit the weapons inspectors -- then we went to war anyway because Bush wanted war all along. Again, there's no excuse for repeating the pattern.

Posted by: Matt Weiner on January 20, 2007 01:29 PM

> Finally, I agree with you on the
> worrisome decline of the NPT but
> the roots of this decline are unclear.

Given the actions of Bush/Cheney, why would any mid-sized regional power NOT be working reasonably fast to obtain nuclear weapons? Having a credible nuclear and anti-ship theat is clearly the only way to prevent one's nation and one's region from coming into the sights of Cheney/PNAC.

What amazes me is that Brazil, Indonesia, etc. and even Japan /aren't/ pursuing nuclear weapons.

Cranky

Posted by: Cranky Observer on January 20, 2007 01:50 PM

The growing pressure to use nuclear weapons against Iran to keep them from developing nuclear weapons (there's some bizarre logic for you) is a big reason for this week's Doomsday Clock reset. Congress is going to have to develop both a spine and some imagination to stop this drift toward catastrophe.

Posted by: Madison Guy on January 20, 2007 02:57 PM

A common theme here is that if Iran does not have plans to use NW first then there is no problem. But, we learned from the Cold War that even defensive nuclear powers can go to the brink and maybe over it. And that was in a world with a small number of nuclear powers. Deterrence in a proliferated world, and where the distances between nuclear powers are small, is likely to be much less stable and prone to crises. Related problems include the spread of fissile materials at the initiative of corrupt officials and what happens to the nukes if the regime collapses.

So, please, spare me the Iran with a nuke is fine because they're rational argument. This is a good argument for a twelve year old but it's poor form at this level.

Posted by: pt on January 20, 2007 02:58 PM

The best analysis of why Israel fears an Iranian bomb comes from Trita Parsi, an Iranian-American analyst:

In spite of its rhetoric, Israel views the regime in Tehran as rational (but extremist), calculating and risk-averse. Even those Israeli officials who believe that Iran is hell-bent on destroying the Jewish state recognize that Tehran is unlikely to attack Israel with nuclear weapons due to the destruction Israel would inflict on Iran through its second-strike capability. With its nuclear-equipped submarines, Israel has a guaranteed second-strike capability. "Whatever measure [the Iranians] have, they can't destroy Israel's capability to respond," Ranaan Gissin, spokesperson for Israel's prime minister, told me. ... Instead, the real danger a nuclear-capable Iran brings with it for Israel is twofold. First, an Iran that does not have nuclear weapons--but that can build them--will significantly damage Israel's ability to deter militant Palestinian and Lebanese organizations. It will damage the image of Israel as the sole nuclear-armed state in the region and undercut the myth of its invincibility. Gone would be the days when Israel's military supremacy would enable it to dictate the parameters of peace and pursue unilateral peace plans. "We cannot afford a nuclear bomb in the hands of our enemies, period. They don't have to use it; the fact that they have it is enough," Member of Knesset Ephraim Sneh explained to me.

Second, the deterrence and power Iran would gain by mastering the fuel cycle could compel Washington to cut a deal with Tehran in which Iran would be recognized as a regional power and gain strategic significance in the Middle East at the expense of Israel... The Great Satan will eventually make up with the ayatollahs and forget about the Jewish state, Israeli officials fear.

Posted by: Peter H on January 20, 2007 03:08 PM

A common theme here is that if Iran does not have plans to use NW first then there is no problem.

No, it's "smaller problem than would be created by war on Iran."

Posted by: Matt Weiner on January 20, 2007 03:13 PM

I don't think anyone would say that a nuclear Iran is no problem, more that it's not a qualitatively different problem than others we face, as many of the blowhard hawks would have it. If America is to be moved towards war by bullshit rhetoric about how Iran will have a bomb within a year and intends to use that bomb to wipe Israel off the map, it's hardly a problem to point out that none of this is true.

If we're going to talk war on Iran, let's be realistic about the reasons for war. Iran being an inherently more dangerous regime than Pakistan or North Korea (it's actually far more stable and responsible an actor) is not one of them.

Posted by: guy on January 20, 2007 03:29 PM

The game is to blame all those who stand for peace for being the true war-mongers. Those who wish for peace are good people, you know, I suppose, probably, but dangerously deluded and now that I think of it now so good either. Peace is war, you know.

Posted by: anne on January 20, 2007 03:41 PM

But, we learned from the Cold War that even defensive nuclear powers can go to the brink and maybe over it.

Gawd, you're a moron. How did we learn that defensive nuclear powers can go "maybe over" the brink? What does that mean? Did we previously think it was theoretically impossible? Was there a nuclear war that nobody told me about?

Deterrence in a proliferated world, and where the distances between nuclear powers are small, is likely to be much less stable and prone to crises.

I think it's a real problem, but I want to see you justify "likely." And, no, the fact that your balls ascend into your guts whenever you see the word "Iran" isn't enough.

Ackerman says the latest, best estimate is that an Iranian nuke is ten years away. As Weiner says, everyone prefers an Iran without nukes, but that doesn't mean that war is preferable to such an Iran. It looks like we have time to sort out our options, at a minimum.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on January 20, 2007 03:42 PM

Well, SomeCallMeTim, I guess rudeness is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

In recent years considerable archival evidence from Cuba and the Soviet Union shows that in the words of Bob McNamara we just very, very lucky in the 1962 Cuban missile crisis. That could easily have gone hot, or over the brink as it were. The Able Archer crisis in the early 1980s was not as severe but still real enough to worry about.

As for estimates, Spencer hasn't a clue what the timeframe is, nor does anyone in the US. We have been wrong on timeframe in almost every other case (Soviet union in 1949, China, India in 1998, Iraq post Gulf War I, etc.).

I am not calling for military action by the way, I'm just saying we need to prepare alternative courses of action to sanction Iran. No one here has addressed my earlier mention of a blockade.

Posted by: pt on January 20, 2007 04:12 PM

Well, SomeCallMeTim, I guess rudeness is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Bit rich coming from someone who wrote, "This is a good argument for a twelve year old but it's poor form at this level." Or maybe just self-critical.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on January 20, 2007 04:15 PM

Sanction Iran for what? Where exactly is the compelling evidence that they have anything but what they say they have, which is a legal nuclear program as allowed under the terms of the NPT? I don't take it as a given that they're running anything else. The burden is on the people who think we should be worried about this to prove there's anything at all to be worried about.

Posted by: guy on January 20, 2007 04:30 PM

If Iran is eventually going to have nukes, it's better that we haven't bombed them first.

Posted by: otto on January 20, 2007 04:47 PM

Once the anti-proliferation regime finishes collapsing, what we need are weapons that are more destructive than nuclear weapons WITHOUT the fallout. Something like Fusion warheads that don't require fission to activate. The key danger of the warheads is the fallout, not the destructive power itself.

Posted by: MNPundit on January 20, 2007 05:08 PM

Re: The key danger of the warheads is the fallout, not the destructive power itself.

The dead and wounded of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (where the weapons were airburst producing virtually no fallout) would disagree wuth this assessment.

Posted by: JonF on January 20, 2007 05:13 PM

And the firebombing of Tokyo was just as deadly so I really fail to see your point. That all bombs are bad? Sure.

But bombs aren't going away anytime soon and shouldn't be going away time soon, so things would be better if we could make bombs that don't cause mass birth defects and radiation poisoning and destroying arable land.

Posted by: MNPundit on January 20, 2007 05:42 PM

Otto's point is dead on accurate. The biggest threat to world peace right now is the U.S. tendency to act in a totally unilateral way and create tremendous world hostility and mistrust toward us. Not to mention that this tendency creates failed states where terrorists can operate easily. An Iranian nuke is less dangerous than the so-called "tough, muscular" actions that some in the U.S. want us to take to prevent an Iranian nuke.

All nukes are scary. U.S. and Israeli nukes just as much (or more) than Iranian ones. Unfortuantely, a peaceful, negotiated halt to major country nuclear proliferation would require current nuclear-owning countries to demonstrate that they can be trusted not to bully non-nuclear owning countries. It may be too late for that. The alternative is for the U.S. to destroy and/or occupy any country that is not our ally that looks close to getting nukes. That is a far more dangerous course than, say, Iran getting nukes. This is something a 12 year old child could understand, but a neocon cannot.

If we worked out a modus vivendi with Mao's nukes, we can do the same with Iran's. The real issue here as that certain people would go to any length to stop Iran's emergence as a regional power.

Posted by: MQ on January 20, 2007 06:07 PM

P.S. I take back the "12 year old" line in my old post, which was a rude reaction to pt's rude, patronizing, and foolish comment further upthread. These are tricky issues with no "good" solutions. But there are less bad and more bad ones.

Posted by: MQ on January 20, 2007 06:09 PM

Even his "wipe Israel off the map" stuff appears to have been a mistranslation of some rather tepid rhetoric

The Times had an article about that whole controversy a while back, and (if I recall right) the most accurate translation they could think of was something like "remove Israel from the pages of history." Which still sounds pretty aggressive.

Ahmadinejad's rhetoric doesn't mean a thing, of course, but it is what it is.

Posted by: cg on January 20, 2007 06:22 PM

"We cannot afford a nuclear bomb in the hands of our enemies, period. They don't have to use it; the fact that they have it is enough," Member of Knesset Ephraim Sneh explained to me.
Second, the deterrence and power Iran would gain by mastering the fuel cycle could compel Washington to cut a deal with Tehran in which Iran would be recognized as a regional power and gain strategic significance in the Middle East at the expense of Israel... The Great Satan will eventually make up with the ayatollahs and forget about the Jewish state, Israeli officials fear.
Posted by: Peter H on January 20, 2007 03:08 PM

1. If Israel is betting on "full spectrum dominance" for the eternal future, it has a bigger national security retardation problem than America has. It's not realistic and it gets riskier going forward as bolder and more destructive options are needed to maintain superiority, at one point it is not going to work and Israel could suffer mass casualties. We don't even know yet if destroying Iraq will end up as a net positive for Israel.

2. You seriously underestimate the power and scope of the American-Israeli lobby. Also I see a false dichotomy. Either America is all for Israel or all for Iran, a little simplistic, no?

Posted by: Northern Observer on January 20, 2007 08:07 PM

Iran has been two years away from having a nuclear weapon for fifteen years. Iran will not attack the US with nuclear weapons for fear of complete destruction. Are they any more likely to pass nuculear weapons to terrorists that have the capability and inclination to attack the US than North Korea, Pakistan China or some crazy Russian? I doubt it and therefore am not all that concerned about Iran having some type of bomb in 3, 5 or 10 years.

Posted by: Ayatollah of Rock n Rolla on January 20, 2007 08:37 PM

Isn't it great to notice that in the group containing US and Iranian executive leadership, the mullahs are the most reality-based? Whee!

Posted by: kvenlander on January 20, 2007 08:47 PM

What I don't get in the whole Iran is at least 10 years away from nuclear weapons. Correct me if I am wrong, but did not the US, granted with some of the greatest minds alive, construct a nuclear weapon using 1940s technology at a time where no one knew it was even possible to build a bomb in less then 5 years. Granted there are issues with hiding a program and what not, but I see no reason why any country in the world, if they were willing to committ the needed resources, could not build a bomb in a similar time frame.

Posted by: nathaniel on January 20, 2007 10:33 PM

Good points Matt.

Seems to me that Rasfanjani's "eventuality" is the end of Israel's strategic WMD advantage, not that a nuclear exchange would actually occur. You have to read it carefully, and without an agenda, but if you do then "it is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality" seems to be wrapping up an argument about the eventual end of Israeli dominance and further Western imperialism in the Islamic world, not nuclear annihilation of Israel.

Iran knows full well they'd face devastating nuclear counterstrikes (irrespective of the Islamic world) if ever striking Israel with nuclear weapons. There always remains the issue of a rogue suicide nuclear bomber, how and from whom this weapon would be procured, and this vulnerability of Iran to this eventuality, of which they have no control, leads me to believe they'd rather cut a deal on the nuclear issue as part of a Grand Bargain rather than actually realize it (so as not to get blamed for it if such a suicide attack does occur someday). The strategic risks for not cooperating right now cut both ways between us and Iran, only leading to greater potentiation of worst-case outcomes. We need to end the madness now and start forging a new global consensus so we can get on to catastrophic risks and problems we all face alike (climate change, resource conflicts, etc.).

Posted by: Jimm on January 21, 2007 04:28 AM

Bitterlemons, nice catch from Trita Parsi! I just quoted her article on Iran-Israel relations from 2005 on my blog to make the point that once, when Khomeini was making the pronouncements that are being quoted by Ahmadinejad, Israeli leaders were claiming that Iran was a natural ally of Israel. Back in the 80s, such people as Yitzhak Rabin "argued that Iran remained an ally geo-politically. Shimon Peres, who sought a “broader strategic relationship with Iran,” urged President Reagan to seek a dialogue with Tehran."

But that was before Iraq folded in Gulf War I. Now, of course, by Marty Peretz standards, Rabin and Peres are your standard anti-semites.

Obviously, if Iran does develop nuclear weapons, it is much better for the U.S. to have a relationship with the nation, like it has with Pakistan, than not. Actually, there is a scary chance of Pakistan using nukes on India, but somehow nobody is asking for liberals to contemplate "tough" action against Pakistan.

Posted by: roger on January 21, 2007 05:23 PM

I really admire the way you approach to tackle this matter which became a global issue . I will be observing your future works and submitting my own views and results of my personal researches.

Posted by: seks shop on October 2, 2007 11:11 AM

Good comment.Thanks admin.

Posted by: youtube on November 17, 2007 04:12 AM

İnternetin Sosyallaştığı Site. Bir Pirikette Sen Koy! Site is Down
http://www.piriketseverler.tr.gg

Posted by: PiriketSeverler on February 8, 2008 04:28 AM

nice workk...

Posted by: Sesli Chat Sohbet on June 1, 2008 03:00 AM

sesli sohbet thanks

Posted by: sesli sohbet on June 21, 2008 10:30 AM

very good sites.. thanks..

Posted by: sohbet on June 26, 2008 09:59 AM

simdi biz bu siteyi kasarken cinsel sohbet birde sohbet odaları
olarak kasmaya calıstık guzel sozler de ilerleme var ona birde mirc yaptık gun gectikce
kelebek script olarak hit alamaya basladık oda olmadı birde kelebek
radyo muz olsun dedik iyi kotu muhabbet oluyordu ama baktık kadınca
çet cet üniversite odaları
nda is yok donduk mirc indir e ondada tat tuz kalmamıs rüya tabirlerine zipladık izmir de oturuyorum iste ..
sonra da yavas yavas ilerlemeye basladık operserv chanserv memoserv nickserv komutlarını yazdık .. bir sonraki hedefimiz sohbet yada chat olacak insallah ..sex seks demi kassak acaba :)

ask oyun itiraf link degisimi siir

Thanks for the great work. !


muhabbet - sohbet odaları - mirc indir - mirc indir - çet - kelebek - script - mirc indir - arkadas - chat - sohbet odaları - kelebek - sohbet - radyo - çet - cet odaları - portalsohbet ekle -


kelebek - kelebek - turk sohbet - çet - muhabbet - muhabbet - turkce mirc - sohbet odaları - sohbet - cinsel chat - mynet chat -

izmir sohbet cinsel sohbet kelebek mirc operserv chanserv siir botserv zurna mynet ataturk universitesi sohbet chat odalari au sohbet au chat kelebek script kelebek script kelebek mirc kelebek skript mric gazi universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,gazi sohbet,gazi chat,kelebek duzce universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,duzce sohbet,duzce chat ... ege universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,ege sohbet,ege chat,kelebek dumlu pınar universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,dumlupınar sohbet ... memoserv, memo serv,memoserv komutlari mesaj komutlari irc mesaj ... mirc indir kamerali mirc yabanci mirc mirc 6.21
sesli tv seslisesli sesliask sesli fıkra sesliefsane sesliyiz sesli türkiyem seslialem sesli dini sohbet ... erzincan universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,erzincan sohbet ... Yüzük Script mirc yüzük cet yüzük script 4 yuzuk sohbet yüzük chat ankara sohbet ankara chat ankara muhabbet ankara arkadas ankara.net erciyes universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,erciyes sohbet,erciyes ... dicle universitesi sohbet chat odalari ,dicle sohbet,dicle chat ... mirc indir,mirc script,mirc yukle,mirc,script mırç,mrc,kelebek ... kelebek cinsel sohbet cinsel chat kelebek mirc myrc script mirc programi turkçe mirc indir mric mrc ... izmir sohbet izmir chat izmir muhabbet izmir arkadas izmir cet çet kelebek sohbet odalari chat sohpet cet kelebek muhabbet çet ... arkadasbul askim - arkadas bul, arkadas arama, arkadas ara ... kelebek host iletisim bilgileri sitene sohbet ekle sitene chat ekle sitene sohbet odasi koy kelebek sohbet , chat kelebek sohbet , cet kelebek sohbet , canli ... sohbet Kizlarla Sohbet Kızlarla Sohbet, Bedava Sohbet Odası ... kelebek sohbet chat muhabbet amasya uiversitesi sohbet chat odalari au sohbet au chat canakkale onsekiz mart universitesi sohbet chat odalari comu ... istanbul sohbet istanbul chat istanbul muhabbet istanbul arkadas

Posted by: kelebek on January 10, 2009 10:59 AM

Thanks you ßy_SuSquN

Posted by: Sohbet on April 8, 2009 10:45 AM

Thanks you ßy_HaYaLiST

Posted by: sohpet on April 18, 2009 12:28 PM

thanks for all

Posted by: sex shop on May 4, 2009 07:36 AM


neon tabela
thank you

Posted by: neon on May 6, 2009 10:08 AM

neon

thank you

Posted by: neon tabela on May 6, 2009 10:12 AM

Thank You Matthew

Filmizle | Film izle | şarkı sözü | şarkı sözleri | hit şarkı sözleri | türkçe şarkı sözleri | yabancı şarkı sözleri | şarkı ekle | şarkı ara | şarkı sözü bul | şarkı sözü ekle | en güzel şarkı sözleri | Vizyon Filim | VizyonFilmi | Seyret | Filmini | Full izle | Dizi izle | Online izle | Filmini izle | Film izlemek | Online Full Seyret izle | Bedava Film izle | internetten Film izle | Online Sinema izle | Videoizlesene | Online Dizi izle | Erotik Filmler | indirmeden Full izle | 18 Filmler | Son Bölümler | SinemaFanClub | Dini Filmler | Video Klibler | Serdar Ortaç | Online 2009 Filmleri | sinemafan | Online Sinema | Hadise | girbi | Kavak Yelleri | 2009 Filmleri | Film Seyret | Süper Sinema | videocenter | 18 film izle | 2008 Filmleri | Sinema Filmi izle | Sinemalar izle | Videoları izle | Dizifilm izle | indirmeden Film izle | Netten izle | Film izlet | Lost | Maç izle | Canlı izle | Full Film izle | Sinema izle | Yeni Filmler | Vizyondakiler | Vizyon Filmleri | izlesene | Direk izle | Kurtlar Vadisi Pusu | Canlı Yayın Maç | Tekmekan Sinema izle | Netten Bedava izle | Sinema Seyret | Aksiyon Filmler | Yabancı Sinema | Beleş izle | DVDRip Film izle | Canlı Yayın Film izle | XviD Film izle | DivX Film izle | Cinetr | Full dizi | Korku Filmi | Kesintisiz izle | Direkizle | Korkufilmi | Online Film izle | Çizgifilm | Animasyon izle | izle | Canlı Yayın Maç izle | Canlı Yayın Film izle | Kurtlar Vadisi Pusu izle | Vizyondakiler izle | Youtube Gir izle | Ktunnel | Ulusal Tv Kanalları | youtube | Yerel Tv Kanalları | Müzik Tv Kanalları | Spor Tv Kanalları | Tv Frekansları | Yabancı Dram izle | Yabancı Romantik izle | Yabancı Aksiyon izle | Yabancı Macera izle | Yabancı Gerilim izle | Yabancı Korku izle | Yabancı Savaş izle | Yabancı Polisiye izle | Yabancı Dizi izle | Belgesel izle | Fantastik Film izle | Tiyatro izle | İslami Film izle | Çizgi Film | Videoizle | indir izle | Link Değişimi | e-film | e-sinema | islami Filmler | Tiyatro izle | Belgesel izle | Romantik Film izle | Komik Film izle | Seks Filmi izle | Vizyondakiler | Türk Filmi izle | Kemal Sunal Filmleri | Show | imeem | Justin.tv | Tv izle | Tv Seyret | Netlog | Facebook | Youtube | Site Ekle | Siteekle | Link Ekle | Link Değişimi | Toplist | Hit Siteler | Oriflame | Oriflame Kozmetik | Oriflamekozmetik | Oriflametr | Kozmetik | Parfüm | Koku | Cilt Bakımı | Saç | Makyaj | Ruj | Katalog | Üyelik | Satış | Sipariş | Hediye | Kampanya | Kariyer | Kazanç | Fırsat | Oje | Krem | Losyon | Jel | Kazanç | | iş imkanı | Danışman | Temsilci | Sponsor | Bilgi | Bilgibu | Bilgi Bu | Popüler Bil | Bedava Bilgi | Online Bilgi | Ücretsiz Bilgi | iyi Bilgi | Aşk Şiirleri | Diyet | Rüya Tabirleri | Şifalı Bitkiler | Dini Bilgiler | Güzel Sölzer | Atatürk | Sağlık | illerimiz | Eğitim | Anne ve Bebek | Aşk ve Evlilik | internet | Astroloji | Bilgisayar | Fıkralar | Çiçek ve Bitkiler | Sevgi | Türk Tarihi | Oyunlar | Pratik Bilgiler | Güzellik ve Moda | Hava Durumu | ilansayfası | Forum | Efendi Forum | Forumx | Forumtr | Frm | Bilgi Forum | Sağlık Forumu | iş forumu | Wordpress | Joomla | Php Nuke | Forum Turkey | Sohbet | Chat | Muhabbet | Mirc | Efendi | Efendi Sohbet | Canlı Canlı | Heyecanlı | Kızlar | Msn | Sohbet Odaları | Bedava Sohbet | Görüntülü Sohbet | Kameralı Chat | Memur | Memuru | Memurlar | Memurum | Memurumuz | Sağlık Memuru | Polis Memuru | Öğretmen | Atama | Yer Değiştirme | Tayin | Becayiş | Yönetmelik | 657 | Devlet Memuru | Sivil Memur | Bağkur | Forum | Aşk | Sevgi | IRC | Programlama Dilleri | Paneller | Türkçe Forum | İşletim Sistemleri | Donanım | Yazılım | Emekli Sandığı | Bağ-kur | Kanun | Torpil | KPSS | Sınav | ÖSYM | OSS | Kamu Personeli | Doktor | Doktorlar | Hemşire | Ebe | Hemşireler | Ebeler | Hademe | Milli Eğitim | Hastane | Okul | Lisans | Doktora | LDS | TUS | Sözleme | Sözleşmeli Memur | Sözleşmeli Personel | Personel | Diyanet | İmam | Asker | Askeri Personel | Subay | Astsubay | Polis | Hakim | Savcı | Avukat | Hukuk | Mühendis | Karayolları | Belediye | Zabıta | şarkı sözü | şarkı sözleri | hit şarkı sözleri | türkçe şarkı sözleri | yabancı şarkı sözleri | şarkı ekle | şarkı ara | şarkı sözü bul | şarkı sözü ekle | en güzel şarkı sözleri | Güvenlik | TCK | Devlet Su işleri | Özel idare | Köy Hizmetleri | Alt Yapı | Daire Başkanlığı | Tıbbi Sekreter | Sekreter | Dışişleri | içişleri | Bakanlık | Bakanlıklar | Memur Sorunları | Psikolojik Danışmanlık | Taltif | Terfi | Ödül | Hediye | Kıdem | Derece | Kademe | Emeklilik | Emekli olmak | Emeklilik Tarihi | Başarılı Personel | Ceza | Kıdem Cezası | Disiplin Cezası | Disiplin Tüzüğü | Personel Alımı | Bayan Personel | Erkek Personel | Disiplin Cezası | Disiplin Cezaları | Sicil | Sicil Affı | Ruhsat | Disiplin Affı | Silah | Pasaport | Yeşil Pasaport | Eş ve Çocuklar | Bakmakla Yükümlü | Yardım | Sağlık Yardımı | Para Yardımı | Borç | Sandık | Sendika | Sendikası | Sendikalar | Üye Olma | Ayrılma | Meslekten Atma | Meslektan Çıkarma | Yemek | Binbir Tarif | Pasta Tarifi | Kek Tarifi | Tatlı Tarifi | Yemek Tarifleri | Türk Yemekleri | Yöresel Yemekler | Tarifler | Oriflame | Oriflame Kozmetik | binbirtarif | Oriflametr | Kozmetik | Parfüm | Koku | Cilt Bakımı | Saç | Makyaj | Ruj | Katalog | Üyelik | Satış | Sipariş | Hediye | Kampanya | Kariyer | Kazanç | Fırsat | Oje | Krem | Losyon | Jel | Kazanç | | iş imkanı | Danışman | Temsilci | Sponsor | Video ekle | Videolar | Video izle | Video seyret | Video yükle | Komik Video | Kamera Şakaları | Korkunç Videolar | İlginç Videolar | Bedava Video Ekle | Bedava video yükle | Yükle izle | youtube videolar | Video Paylaş | Site Ekle | SiteEkle | Toplist | Hit Sayacı | Dizin | Link Değişimi Backlink | Ücretsiz Site Ekle | Forum | Cpanel | Plesk | IRC | Lxadmin | Türkçe Paneller | Host | İşletim Sistemleri | Donanım | Yazılım | Bedava Site Ekle | karşılıksız Site Ekle | Site | Babil | Babil Host | Hosting | Dantel | Türk Dantel | Örgü Dantel | Oya | Dantel Örnekleri |


Posted by: Toplist on June 14, 2009 09:14 AM

thankS

Posted by: Sesli Chat on June 18, 2009 05:53 PM

Post A Comment

advertise_liberally.gif