Chuck Hagel: Rightwinger

In case this isn't clear, check out Cenk Uygur's post on Chuck Hagel -- if you look at his record in the Senate, what you'll see is an honest to God conservative Republican representing the state of Nebraska. You'll also see a guy who's said a lot of very tough and smart things about the Iraq War and George W. Bush's policies in the region in general. But he's not a moderate Republican by any standard; on a whole wide range of issues he's a very orthodox conservative. He doesn't seem to be a particularly enthusiastic culture warrior, but he votes with the Christian right all the time and their issues, and with business on their issues.

He's not, in short, really a Republican Joe Lieberman -- not someone with a whole array of stick-it-to-the-base notions. Outside of the foreign policy realm, there's not much to like here from a liberal point of view.

1/31/07 9:22AM del.icio.us this incoming links

Comments

I'd much rather have someone who was a down-the-line conservative on domestic issues and rational on foreign policy issues, such as Hagel, than someone who is more moderate on domestic issues but nutty on foreign policy, like McCain.

If you look at the damage Bush has done with just one foreign policy issue, the Iraq war, its orders of magnitude more than any damage he could have done even if his entire domestic agenda, including social security privatization, had been enacted.

Posted by: Jim W on January 31, 2007 09:42 AM

Two comments. First, doesn't that make him a republican Joe Lieberman? Votes with the party on issues other than the war.

Second, the perception of Hagel as a centrist or even left of center demonstrates a phenomenon that's been around for awhile. Right and left have become pro-war and anti-war. You're either a signatory on the neo-con program or you're a loony lefty endangering the troops and our country.

Glenn Greenwald is a must read today, as he prints quotes of Republican opposition to Clinton's intervention in the Balkans.

Posted by: jayackroyd on January 31, 2007 10:21 AM

1. Yeah, I'm not sure where you get this idea that Lieberman has "a whole array of stick-it-to-the-base notions", especially if you are only talking about voting record and not rhetoric (which is where you also find Hagel deviating).

2. One difference between them is that Hagel routinely votes against excessive agricultural subsidies. A pretty principled stand, considering that he represents Nebraska.

Posted by: Tony V on January 31, 2007 10:28 AM

Which is awesome, he's undeniably (although they try) one of them, but he doesn't buy their bull on Iraq.

Posted by: aleks on January 31, 2007 10:52 AM

I actually like Hagel quite a lot, but I agree people are too eager to see him as anything other than what he really is: a good, old-fashioned paleo-conservative. Kind of a novelty at this point, and I think this is why people are so blown away by him. He fits that classic mold of someone you could have a heated, energetic argument with but still like afterwards. I'd say "have a beer with afterwards," but considering what Bush has done to that little trope, I won't go anywhere near there.

I have a lot of respect for him and appreciate what he's doing, but he's really most effective on the other side of the aisle. He'll be able to cause some mayhem in the Republican primaries but, honestly, won't stand much of a chance. He's a good speaker and a quick thinker, and would make for some very entertaining debates if he ever made it to the general elections. A debate between Hagle and either Obama or Edwards would definitely be one to see.

Hopefully he'll get some more power and help build a reasonable, intelligent opposition party, as opposed to either the poisonous, hyper-ideological Delay-style Republicanism or simpering, collaborating, Lierberman-style *coughs* "bipartisanism."

Posted by: L Boom on January 31, 2007 10:54 AM

If you look at the various Senate rankings, you'll see that Hagel and Lieberman are really quite similar. Take the National Journal senate rankings for example. Hagel was the 37th least conservative Republican, and Lieberman was the 38th least liberal Democrat, in 2005 (the NJ rankings are, I think, the most respected among these type of rankings).

In BOTH cases, you can find "a whole array of stick-it-to-the-base notions". For Hagel, besides Iraq, for example, he opposed the Family Marriage Amendment, he is pro-immigration, he opposed the NSA spying plan, he supports direct negotiations with Iran.

Lieberman = Hagel. Hagel = Lieberman. Pretty simple formula.

Posted by: Al on January 31, 2007 10:58 AM

But on the issue of the day, Iraq, Hagel is reality-based whereas Lieberman is with the neocon pod-people.

Posted by: Jim W on January 31, 2007 11:00 AM

As far as his positions go, I think he's actually pretty consistent with the ideals of an old-style Goldwater conservative, things like low taxes, keep the government out of people's private lives, and a pragmatic foreign policy. You're right in that this out of touch with the modern Republican base, but it's pretty much in line with the more libertarian, corporatist, Reagan-fetishizing wing of the party. He's not so much screwing the modern, more theocratic base as he is playing to a largely extinct part of that base.

And in Hagel's defense, I think we can at least say he's honest and, as sad it is to have to tack this on, he's sane. If you disagree with him (And I do. On many, many issues), you can at least understand where he's coming from and believe that he's arguing in good faith.

The same cannot be said for Lieberman, who's a morally bankrupt, fundamentally dishonest asshole.

Posted by: L Boom on January 31, 2007 11:14 AM

Al again is wrong. Lieberman goes on any show to talk about how bad Democrats are, Hagel does not do the same. Hagel has yet to come out and say he won't vote for the Republican nominee nor has he left the party.

Posted by: Rob on January 31, 2007 11:19 AM

Outside of the foreign policy realm, there's not much to like here from a liberal point of view.

I couldn't repudiate more the notion that Hagel's souring on Bush's war is in any way indicitave of his politics otherwise. It buys into the Bush Cultist frame that "liberal" == "disagrees with Bush," and that's the last frame Bush's opponents need to succor.

The point is, Bush's war is unpopular with Americans from across the political spectrum, and only the true dead-ender Bush cultists support it. Far from imagining Hagel as a moderate, we should point out the fact that he's is in fact a conservative Republican and still calls bullshit on Bush's Folly.

Posted by: Gregory on January 31, 2007 11:50 AM

That's fine, Matt, and if you take being a Democrat to be the most important thing, don't vote for Hagel. But, given that Hagel is right on the most important issue right now, he deserves somewhat more respect than you seem to give him. I'd vote for Kerry, even though I don't agree with him on anything but the war.

Posted by: 213@gmal.com on January 31, 2007 11:53 AM

I've been saying this very thing every since Hagel started talking tough about Iraq. They guy's old school conservative, and while that's better than the new variety, he shouldn't be canonized as some paragon of moderation due to one issue.

Of course, no one ever listens to me, so ...

:-)

Posted by: Unholy Moses on January 31, 2007 11:56 AM

Personally, I think the fact that he's a straight-up old school conservative opposed to the war in Iraq and not quite in the social conservative camp, as opposed to Brownback who is the ideal candidate for the religious right, is all the more reason he should run for President. He will be unique among the others in the race. I also think he offers the Republicans a candidate conservatives can be satisifed with and who has a conceivable chance of winning the general election.

I think he's hesitating to enter the rance because he's not quite sure he wants to be President. Which is always understandable -- he might prefer legislating, he wants to work for Nebraskans, although he may think he can be a good President, he's unsure if he'd enjoy it -- and even more understandable considering the next President has to inherit Bush's war. As Spock once remarked, "It has always been easier to destroy than to create."

www.matthewstruhar.blogspot.com

Posted by: Matthew Struhar on January 31, 2007 12:33 PM

The unique thing about Hagel is that he always says what he really thinks and doesn't just give the latest spin. His voting is very conservative, but for the last couple years he's always seemed to give his honest opinion and never the party line, and so is usually worth listening to.

Lieberman is exactly the opposite: he jumps right to the most egregious spin, and was quick to pick up Bush's implications that those who oppose the war favor our enemies, etc.

I think this explains why Lieberman with a 80% liberal voting record causes such revulsion (more than say, Ben Nelson, or Evan Bayh, or others who are more conservative historically than Joe), and someone with an 20% liberal voting like Hagel is much more tolerable

Posted by: Dan O'C on January 31, 2007 01:57 PM

than someone who is more moderate on domestic issues but nutty on foreign policy, like McCain.

Senator McCain is an extremely conservative Republican. He supported South Dakota's abortion ban. He supported Arizona's antigay amendment. He (now) supports making all of President Bush's tax cuts permanent. Senator McCain is not a moderate, any more than Senator Hagel is a heroic critic of the Bush administration for making a speech about a nonbinding resolution. Senator Hagel had numerous chances to substantively oppose heinous actions by this administration over the last six years; feel free to point out one time that deeds followed words. Bolton? Nope. Warrantless wiretapping? Nope. Torture? Nope. Only Arlen Specter stands between him and the title of "Most Likely to Roll Over for this Administration after Talking Tough for the Cameras." But at least he filibustered a straight minimum wage increase, along with voting to abolish the federal minimum wage entirely. Must we keep finding reactionary conservative Republicans to worship for putting on a good media show? Hey, I hear Senator Brownback opposes the surge; because of this, I think it would be swell for him to occupy the Oval Office, despite his recently restated desire to see Roe v. Wade eradicated.

Posted by: mds on January 31, 2007 02:01 PM

Aren't we forgetting last year's Hagel-Martinez act to bring in another 100 million or so immigrants? I know the slaughterhouse owners in Nebraska are worried that they may have to raise wages by two bits an hour unless Something Is Done, but Hagel-Martinez seemed a bit like overkill... I mean, it would have been cheaper and better for the American citizenry just to give every meat packing plant owner in Nebraska a solid gold Rolls-Royce than to pass Hagel-Martinez.

Posted by: Steve Sailer on January 31, 2007 09:47 PM

213@gmal.com wrote, "That's fine, Matt, and if you take being a Democrat to be the most important thing, don't vote for Hagel. But, given that Hagel is right on the most important issue right now, he deserves somewhat more respect than you seem to give him. I'd vote for Kerry, even though I don't agree with him on anything but the war."

Not a week ago Chuck Hagel voted with 27 other GOP senators to end the federal minimum wage altogether.

He is not only not moderate, he is a movement conservative extremist.

How may of our parents and grandparents and uncles and aunts could survive without Social Security? How many would be forced to sell their homes or could not even pay their rent? How many would be eating cat-food, and only twice a day? How many would be found dead of hypothermia because they can't afford heat? How many could afford medical care without Medicare and Medicaid?

The social democracy issues, on which the movement conservatives are the most bitter and relentless enemies of the American people, are life-and-death issues, too. And it's the life or death of grandma, not of somebody on the other side of the world. It may be tough to hear, but that counts.

I am not a Democrat. I am a registered Green, and I voted for Ralph Nader, and the way things are going I may do so again.

But I can think of any number of Democrats I would rather see in the White House than this slightly-off-the-reservation but bitterly orthodox conservative.

Social Security, Medicare, prescription drugs, tax progressivity, the strength and integrity of government regulatory agencies, labor rights, the minimum wage, universal health care, universal access to education, the diabetes and obesity epidemics, the lingering power of the tobacco interests, global warming, the general degradation of the environment, global overpopulation, the dangerous decline of fisheries with the degradation of the oceans . . . it just goes on and on.

And most of these are life-or-death issues, and many are global in impact.

Hagel is better on Iraq than GW? So he is. So are lots of Democrats. And they are all better than him on all of the above.

And then there is always Ralph Nader.

Posted by: Gaius Sempronius Gracchus on February 1, 2007 08:00 AM

Where are all these Democrats that are better than Bush on Iraq? Certainly not running for President, unless you count Kucinich who as usual isn't getting any press. Edwards is a hawk on Iran, which is the next front in the great perpetual war scam. Hillary is a hawk by any sane standards. Obama appears to have no opinions of his own at all, but he's not an overt dove in any meaningful way.

Hagel leaves alot to be desired, but if foreign policy is the key issue, and you are anti-war he's certainly a better candidate than pretty much anyone in the field so far.

Posted by: Dylan Hales on February 1, 2007 06:52 PM

Hi, I'm a conservative Republican who cut my political eyeteeth campaigning for Ronald Reagan and Jesse Helms in the 70's and 80's. Today Chuck Hagel is one of only a few Republicans I would vote to be President. But I have two words for you liberals who worry about Senator Hagel's record on social issues: "States' Rights". For you, Roe v. Wade is about abortion rights. For me, it is and was always about States' Rights. This is why I switched my registration from Democrat to Republican when I was in law school (in class with John and Elizabeth Edwards, no less!). For all my life, I have decried left-wingers on the Supreme Court telling the people of the fifty states they know better than them how to order the social policies of their states. Now, in recent years, right-wingers in Congress have been trying to do the same thing, what with Terri Schiavo, partial birth abortion and gay marriages. I say, "a pox on both their houses"! Chuck Hagel opposes abortion and gay marriage and a lot of other things liberals like to call "rights". But more importantly, he fundamentally believes what the Constitution says - that these questions are reserved to the states to decide, each one for itself. If "blue" states want to pass liberal laws on abortion, stem cell research, gay marriage and what have you, he believes they have the right to do so, just as "red" states have the right to do the opposite. If Democrats hadn't supported the anti-democratic agenda of the Supreme Court in robbing the states of these prerogatives, they wouldn't have created the Christian Right, who were never interested in what Washington did in foreign policy or tax policy or welfare spending, as long as they were free in their own communities to live their lives according to the laws they always had. Except for this, you would still be winning elections as you were in the days of FDR, JFK and LBJ. So wise up! Join us "real" conservatives in electing Chuck Hagel, who has more courage than your candidates do to get us out of foolish foreign wars, and in overturning Roe v. Wade and the other Supreme Court decisions that put issues of personal morality on the national political agenda, and I guarantee you, as much as we conservatives may hate it, within ten years you will be back to enjoying the majorities in Congress you need to vote for high taxes, free medical care, and antipoverty programs to your hearts' content!

Posted by: William Dalton on February 3, 2007 02:08 AM

thx for all very good article

Posted by: youtube on August 7, 2007 04:24 AM

porno pornotube porn Sex Güzel Sözler Acı sözler Duygusal Sözler sextube 89 89com Seks Amerikan kapı Sohbet Chat Mobilya Ahşap Arkadaş arkadaşlık sikiş Site Ekle Ahşap kapı Toplist site Ekle toplist Türkçe Mirc Mirc sextube Sohbet chat Kapı Tosya Ahşap TOSYA MSN messenger film indir resimler oyun oyunlar video türbanlı sikiş sevgi ASK dini Sözler
pusat dizisi sextube
THANK YOU GRUP..

Posted by: Site EKLE on August 31, 2007 03:57 PM

I think , İt's very nice ...

Posted by: sohbet on September 1, 2007 12:06 PM

sohbet

Posted by: java sohbet on September 28, 2007 05:34 PM

sohbet
chat sohbet
mynet sohbet
kızlarla sohbet
sohbet siteleri
islami sohbet
sesli sohbet
kameralı sohbet
sohbet odaları
sohbet net
kelebek sohbet
alem sohbet
canlı sohbet
bedava sohbet
dini sohbet
ideal sohbet
erotik sohbet
internet sohbet
almanya sohbet
bol sohbet
yazgülü sohbet
seks sohbet
isvec sohbet
sohbet odasi
chat sohbet muhabbet
chat mynet sohbet
almanya sohbet chat
zurna sohbet
sex sohbet
canli sohbet
cet kelebek sohbet
sohbet com
ingilizce sohbet
gay sohbet
cinsel sohbet
mynet odalari sohbet
35 sevgi sohbet
sohbet gen tr
kahkaha sohbet
istanbul sohbet
odasi sohbet turk
chat.tc sohbet
sevgi sohbet
yonca sohbet
makas sohbet
cinsellik sohbet
kraltv sohbet
turkce sohbet
ara sohbet
chat cinsellik sohbet
lesbian sohbet
sohbet cet
chat muhabbet sex sohbet
sohbet et
hotmail.com sohbet
keriz sohbet
izmir sohbet
sohbet sohbet
cam sohbet
islam sohbet
sohbet tr zurna
bayan msn sohbet
sohbet sohbet.com
seviyeli sohbet
sohbet sitesi
yazili sohbet
sohbet ankara
kardelen sohbet
konya sohbet
7 islami kanal sohbet
web cam sohbet
java sohbet

Posted by: sohbet on September 28, 2007 05:37 PM

thank you

Posted by: seks shop on October 2, 2007 10:39 AM

sohbet
bol sohbet
bolsohbet
chat
muhabbet
türkchat
sohbet odaları
fix sohbet
sohbet et
sohbet yap
sohbete gir
sohbet giris
sohbet

Posted by: sohbet on October 6, 2007 08:27 PM

Love a you blog

Posted by: www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması on October 22, 2007 09:09 PM

Posted by: sevgi on November 2, 2007 12:43 AM

Posted by: muhabbet on November 25, 2007 03:57 PM

www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması
www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması
www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması
Sağır Oda
dizi izle
www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması
dizi izle
resim galerisi
haber
forum
küresel ısınma
küresel ısınma
küresel ısınma
r10 seo yarışması
r10 seo yarışması
r10 seo yarışması

Posted by: www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması on December 3, 2007 07:05 AM

plaket silt kristal plaket cam plaket dijital plaket prinç plaket masa isimlikleri matbaa kupa ödül kupası madalya madalyon etiket levha yaka kartı tabela plaketci plaket üretim plaket satis ödül kupası futbol kupası basketbol kupası voleybol kupası atletizm kupası hentbol kupası briç kupası bowling kupası kupa satis kupa uretim madalya üretim madalya satis madalyon üretim madalyon satis cam plaket silt üretim silt satis matbaa brosür katalog kartvizit dosya antetli levha üretim levha satis etiket aliminyum etiket alümünyum etiket üretim etiket satis yakakartı üretim yakakartı satis reklam ajansı crative reklam ajansı reklam ajansları tv reklam ajansı reklamcılık ajans reklam kurumsal kimlik grafik tasarım ajanda promosyon ajanda promosyon ajanda 2008 ajanda takvim promosyon takvim 2008 takvimi gemici takvimi piramit takvim promosyon urunleri promosyon malzemeleri masa takvimi kalem promosyon kalem tükenmez kalem ahsap kalem plastik kalem kalem setleri kalem takimlari cakmak promosyon cakmak anahtarlik promosyon anahtarlik matbaa matbaaci kartvizit web tasarim grafik afiş bloknot dijital baski el ilani antetli zarf serigraf katalog brosür

Posted by: plaket silt kristal plaket cam plaket dijital plaket prinç plaket masa isimlikleri matbaa kupa öd� on December 9, 2007 09:19 AM

evden eve nakliyat, tasimacilik, nakliyat firmaları, nakliyat firması, nakliye, uluslararası nakliye, tasimacilik

Posted by: evden eve nakliyat, tasimacilik, nakliyat firmaları, nakliyat firması, on December 9, 2007 09:28 AM

eğitim fuarı fuar, fair, sanal gezinti, sanal fuar, 3d fuar, 3d gezinti, sektörel fuar, fuar takvimi

Posted by: eğitim fuarı fuar, fair, sanal gezinti, sanal fuar, 3d fuar, 3d gezinti, sektörel fuar, fuar takv on December 9, 2007 09:29 AM

kostüm, kostüm Kiralama, kostüm satış, çocuk kostümleri, anaokulu kostümleri, kostüm satisi, bale, bale kıyafetleri, çocuk, gösteri, Piyes, gösteri kostümleri, gösteri kıyafetleri, palyaço kostümleri, buz pateni kostümü, masal kostümleri, latin dans kostümleri, dans kostümleri, folklor kostümü, folklör kostümü, hediye paketleri, tiyatro kostümleri

Posted by: kostüm, kostüm Kiralama, kostüm satış, çocuk kostümleri, anaokulu kostümleri, kostüm satisi on December 9, 2007 09:30 AM

thanks for this post

Posted by: aydınlatma on December 10, 2007 04:41 AM

Thanks
Best regards
mirc
mirç
mırc
mırç
mircturk
turkmirc
mirc indir
mirc yukle
mirch
mırch
mirc turk
turk mirc
mırcturk
turkmırc
mırc turk
turk mırc
turkiyemirc
türkiyemirc
turkiye mirc
türkiye mirc
mircturkiye
mirctürkiye
mirc turkiye
mircturk
turkmırc
muhabbet
mirc sohbet
mırc sohbet
mirc chat
mırc chat
mırc ındır
mirc ındır
Türkçe mirc
Türkce mirc
Turkçe mirc
Türkce mirc
Türkçe mırc
Türkce mırc
Turkçe mırc
Turkce mırc
mirc
mirc
forum
forum
turkforum
turkiyeforum
mirc
turkmirc
toplist
site ekle
pagerank
turkmirc
turkforum
sohbet
chat
sohbet odaları
bedava sohbet
bedava chat
türk
karar

Posted by: muhabbet on December 23, 2007 02:59 PM

Sevgi Ve Aşk Platformu SanaSevdam.Net

thanks

Posted by: sanasevdam on December 27, 2007 05:55 PM

forum siteleri

Posted by: forum on January 1, 2008 05:27 AM

almanca tercüman rusça tercüman fransızca tercüman arapça tercüman farsça tercüman tercüme büroları ispanyolca tercüman almanca tercüme japonca tercüman çince tercüman bulgarca tercüman yunanca tercüman danca tercüman hollandaca tercüman ibranice tercüman italyanca tercüman korece tercüman norveççe tercüman portekizce tercüman romence tercüman sırpça tercüman ukraynaca tercüman istanbul tercüme tercüme bürosu web sitesi çevirisi ingilizce tercüman fransızca çeviri fransızca tercüme tercüme italyanca çeviri çekçe tercüme fince tercüman prestij tercüme

Posted by: çeviri on January 11, 2008 12:13 PM

thanksss

Posted by: oyun indir on January 13, 2008 01:18 PM

I think, and find a really smart team to work with.

Posted by: Porno on January 17, 2008 08:52 PM

porno
sex
hikaye
sex
mirc
hikaye
porno
sex
sex shop
seks shop
güzel sözler
mirc
mirc
porno
güzel sözler
hikaye
mirc
hikayeler
mirc
kelebek
elektronik sigara
elektronik sigara
elektronik sigara
sex
porno
hikaye
sex
porno
mirc
mirc
seks shop
hikaye
hikaye

Posted by: sex on January 19, 2008 02:58 PM

I have a question for anyone that might have an answer. Why is everyone jumping on the Vista bandwagon? It is brand new and not fully tested. Just like every other version of Windows that has come out, the first version is always full of bugs. I know at least 6 people that had it crash their computer because of a bug in the coding. There are bound to be tons bugs in the system. Lets us not forget WindowsME or even WindowsXP. They were filled with problems when they came out. It took some time for them ot release a reliable version that people could work on. Just because somehting looks pretty does not mean that it is. I think that they think if they make it look pretty, it will solve everything. They never do take the time to work through all the problems before they put it on the shelves.

Posted by: luggage on January 20, 2008 02:35 AM

Thanks good website.

Posted by: sevgi on January 28, 2008 08:45 AM

Thanks ;
sex
seks
erotik
porno
video
izlesene
youtube
youtube videoları
izle
vidyo
video
youtube