Smells Like Pickup

I keep not blogging about David Iglesias' firing from his U.S. Attorney's job in New Mexico because it doesn't seem like the central focus of the post should be our similar last names, but I can't really get past it. My last name frequently gets misspelled, so when I see blogs writing about "Iglesias" on some level my instinct is to assume they're talking about me. But, well, they aren't. Get over it. The salient thing about the involvement of Heather Wilson and Pete Domenici is that their seats are both somewhat vulnerable. Domenici, in particular, is a classic case of a guy who as a clean incumbent is hard to beat, but where the GOP could easily lose an open seat and/or a race where the incumbent is tainted by scandal. My understanding is that the strongest possible Democratic contenders have been shying away from entering the race unless Domenici decides to step down. They should probably reconsider that.

Comments

If we couldn't take Wilson down in the perfect storm of '06 with a well-suported candidate, I wouldn't bet on taking her down in '08. She's a terrifically strong candidate - very good on TV with a very good resume. In fact, if Domenici doesn't run, I'd expect her to win the Senate seat unless it's another extraordinarily good year for us nationally.

As to Domenici, even with the Yglesias (sic) scandal, I still wouldn't advise a Dem contender to take Domenici on if he cared about losing. (Of course, if the Attorney scandal has legs - which I'm guessing it won't - all bets are off.)

Posted by: Petey on March 2, 2007 11:26 AM

Oh come on. It is all about you. And we love it.

Posted by: Robert the Red on March 2, 2007 11:40 AM

After he's done testifying, I hope he considers more duets with Willie Nelson.

Seriously - doubtful Mr. Iglesias will have such a post-firing soft landing as his colleague Debra Yang.

Posted by: SoCalJustice on March 2, 2007 12:24 PM

How'd a Jewish kid end up with a last name of Church?

Posted by: jerry on March 2, 2007 12:25 PM

Petey's point seems a little pessimistic.

First, incumbents almost never lose.

Second, Wilson is a pretty entrenched incumbent who outspent her opponent by $1.6 million, not counting NRCC efforts. Madrid was an OK candidate but her deer-in-headlights moment late in the campaign was immediate commercial fodder. She only squeezed out an 875-vote victory. In 2006, the GOP incumbents who survived tough campaigns were more likely to be those early targets (Gerlach, Shays, Reichert, Pryce) with moderate credentials like Wilson; they were running hard for a year and a half. Wilson's district has a slightly D presidential lean. I don't think she's a goner, but not beating her in 2006 doesn't mean she's unbeatable.

Second, Domenici would be really hard to beat under normal circumstances, but an open seat would be a coin flip, especially when bth parties will be targeting NM pretty hard.

Posted by: Seth D. on March 2, 2007 02:12 PM

"Madrid was an OK candidate but her deer-in-headlights moment late in the campaign was immediate commercial fodder. She only squeezed out an 875-vote victory."

Both quite true.

But we didn't lose many Kerry CD's in '06, and I think the odds are against us having nearly as strong a wind at our backs in '08. I'd be reasonably un-nervous about '08 if I were Heather Wilson or Chris Shays. I think they're likely past their moment of greatest peril.

Posted by: Petey on March 2, 2007 03:21 PM

All of the above is true about Wilson until you factor in the scandal. If she is part of a concerted attempt to lean on U.S. Attorneys to go easy on Republican elected officials, and go hard on Democrats, that changes the dynamic completely (especially since she has a close shave pretty much every election).

Posted by: kth on March 2, 2007 05:22 PM

we didn't lose many Kerry CD's in '06

I'll quibble with your point here. There weren't many R-held Kerry districts before 2006; we picked up about half of them.

Out of 18, we won 10 and lost 8. Two of those pickups were open seats. Some of the others were surprises; nearly all were very, very close. Many more of our pickups were in Bush districts, including several where the challenge was unexpected and thus not taken very seriously.

Among the 8 we missed were some of the D-Trip's most heavily targeted seats (Shays, Gerlach, Wilson, Reichert). The fact that they were targeted early and hard by the Democrats meant that the GOP dumped huge amounts of money to save them.

I agree that Wilson should be less worried now than in 2008, but that's never going to be a "safe" district for her. It's always one that should be targeted, and hammering Wilson on a scandal helps soften her up for that purpose.

Posted by: Seth D. on March 3, 2007 11:13 AM

"Out of 18, we won 10 and lost 8."

I love actual numbers.

"It's always one that should be targeted, and hammering Wilson on a scandal helps soften her up for that purpose."

No doubt.

Posted by: Petey on March 3, 2007 11:36 AM

Sorry, isn't "Iglesias" a more correct spelling?

Posted by: piotr on March 3, 2007 10:38 PM

Good comment.Thanks admin.

Posted by: youtube on November 17, 2007 05:28 AM

thanks much

Posted by: sevgi on January 9, 2008 02:24 AM

thanks much

Posted by: sohbet on January 9, 2008 02:26 AM

thank you man.

Posted by: youtube on February 6, 2008 06:59 PM

There are many useful informations in this great article…I really enjoy reading the whole blog that you write. Thanks!

Posted by: übersetzungen on March 3, 2008 05:44 PM

thanks ;)

Posted by: firefox indir on March 31, 2008 06:47 AM

thanks ;)

Posted by: firefox indir on April 1, 2008 11:18 AM

Thank you for documents.

Posted by: dizi izle on May 25, 2008 10:31 AM
Posted by: baterry on December 7, 2008 01:22 AM

Post A Comment

advertise_liberally.gif