I Hear They're Also Funding North Korea

David Brooks offers up a fairly novel line of attack on John Mearsheimer and Steven Walt:

There seemed to be a time, after 9/11, when it was generally accepted that terror and extremism were symptoms of a deeper Arab malaise. There seemed to be a general recognition that the Arab world had fallen behind, and that it needed economic, political and religious modernization. . . .

The events of the past three years have shifted their diagnosis of where the cancer is — from dysfunction in the Arab world to malevolence in Jerusalem and in Aipac. Furthermore, the Walt and Mearsheimer paper on the Israel lobby has had a profound effect on Arab elites. It has encouraged them not to be introspective, not to think about their own problems, but to blame everything on the villainous Israeli network.

Yes, it's true. The main obstacles to political and economic reform in the United States are . . . American critics of current US Israel policy. Please. Any nice Jewish boy can tell you that Arab political elites were pretty damn good at deflecting attention of their own shortcomings and onto Israel long before The London Review of Books decided to publish the infamous article. The key variable here -- as Brooks has it in the previous sentence -- is not Walt and Mearsheimer, but "the events of the past three years." America suffered a serious and deadly terrorist attack that, fortunately, did not damage our nations key sources of economic or military strength and, indeed, had the consequence of strengthening our hand politically. As Brooks notes, it opened up a hopeful moment in international relations. But rather than seizing the moment, the Bush administration squandered it.

(Actually funding the DPRK -- our friends in Ethiopia)

Comments

The main obstacles to political and economic reform in the United States are . . .

You mean "political and economic reform in the Arab world".

Posted by: ~~~~ on April 8, 2007 11:22 AM

Did he really capitalize AIPAC as "Aipac"? Isn't that wrong? And if it's wrong, doesn't it show--just as the LRB's miscapitalization of the "l" in "Israel lobby" demonstrated about W&M--that Brooks is an anti-semite?

Also, "a general recognition that"-- in "to be a general recognition that the Arab world had fallen behind, and that it needed economic, political and religious modernization"--should be "an unwillingness to listen to anyone who pointed out the general fatuousness of explanatory claims that." He seems to believe that the problem is that we've stopped listening to comic book explanations of the world. That's not someone with whom you can argue; he genuinely lives in a world that's different, in ways large and small, from the one the rest of live in. I can't wait till he decides that Fanon had a point, and we need to start kicking the shit out of teh Muslim Oppressors for the sake of kicking the shit out of them.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 11:25 AM

And any observer of US politics would tell you that US politicians and the media have been deflecting attention from their own, and Israel's, shortcomings and onto the need for the Arab world to undergo 'political and economic reform' for decades. David Brooks' article is only the latest example of a mighty collection.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 11:46 AM

Re otto

Ah yes, Mr. otto continues to try to convince us that if only the State of Israel would go out of business, all would be well in the Moslem world. Thus, if Israel went out of business, suddenly the Shiites and Sunnis would love each other and nary a cross word would pass between them ever again. Also, the influence of the radical Muslim fundamentalists would magically disappear overnight. It's all very simple, you're just stupid if you don't understand it.

Posted by: SLC on April 8, 2007 12:25 PM

"Mosl-homicid-ians"

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 12:35 PM

Did he really capitalize AIPAC as "Aipac"

This is NYTimes style for long, pronounceable acronymys. They also write "Nafta" instead of NAFTA. I think it's weird.

Posted by: Matthew Yglesias on April 8, 2007 01:09 PM

My understanding is that the capitalization of "Lobby" in "Israel Lobby" was a result of the LRB's style conventions. So "Aipac" remains definitive proof that Brooks's column is worse than the Protocols of Zion.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 01:15 PM

Yes, SLC. Iran's primary anger regarding the US has nothing to do with the fact that the CIA instituted a coup of the country in 1953 and installed a brutal dictator; instead it's all based on anger at Israel.
Iraq's primary anger has nothing to do with the fact that the US was happy to help Hussein to power and then, just to seal the deal, created a post-Hussein situation that is even worse than what went before; again the primary concern of the average Iraqi is "getting back" at Israel.
The average Egyptian, likewise, is far more interested in Israel than in the fact that the US showers money on their dictator and even tells the rest of the world what a marvellous
democrat he is.
How clearly I now see the world.

I've no idea if the ME would become more peaceful if Israel left, but I'm damn sure it would if the US left.

Posted by: Maynard Handley on April 8, 2007 02:23 PM

Of course these issues are not unconnected. One reasons that we support undemocratic governments in the ME is that we want to support governments which can accommodate, no matter how two-facedly, our support of Jewish colonialism.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 02:38 PM

we want to support governments which can accommodate, no matter how two-facedly, our support of Jewish colonialism.

It's possible that it works the other way around, too. We might, in part, support the existence of Israel--and more, an Israel that is regarded with hostility by its neighbors--so that when the West does (or has to do) something unpopular in the region, those Muslims who are angered to action have somewhere to bomb that isn't actually in the West. That is, just as some claim that Israel gets a lot out of our ME policy at a cost to us, it's possible that we get a lot out of our policy at a cost to Israel.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 02:46 PM

SCMT, counterintuitive!! But unlikely. What you propose would imply a US policy in the Middle East fervently opposed by Israeli lobby groups in the US, since we would be sticking Israel with the costs of our policies. The opposite is of course true. You could of course imagine a world where Israeli lobby activists dominate a US policy area just in order to encourage Arab countries to bomb Israel but then we are entering bizarro world.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 02:59 PM

Mmm, I'm not so sure. I can imagine a man who (a) believes that "sexual freedom" harms women's interests by making it easier for men to behave caddishly, (b) notes that various women's groups also support "sexual freedom" because they believe it helps, rather than hurts, women, and (c) therefore supports those groups, because he wants further license to behave badly. (No, I'm not that guy. I've met him, though, and so, probably, have you.) Moreover, because we're talking about a number of interactions that might be characterized according to his estimation or that of the women's group, I can imagine that each side might be able to fairly point to a number of individual interactions in support; that is, it's not clear that it's a "One Rule To Describe Them All" situation.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 03:31 PM

SCMT: If you think that we're in a world where Israeli lobby activists dominate policy towards the ME just in order to encourage Arab countries to bomb Israel, what can I say other than I look forward to your book manuscript! Start with a warm-up article in the LRB -- that way you get good feedback to strengthen your ideas.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 03:38 PM

Re Maynard Handley

Mr. Handley should be aware that my response to Mr. otto was meant sarcastically. For his information, Mr. otto is an enthusiastic Israel basher who is absolutely in favor of eliminating the State of Israel, as is his hero Norman Finkelstein. As can be seen from a later comment of his relative to the accusation of "Jewish colonialism," he is probably, at the least a borderline antisemite.

However, it should be pointed out that the Shah of Iran, Mubarak, and Saddam Hussein aren't any worse then another dictator, thankfully now deceased, who was not supported by the Uniter States, namely Hafaz Assad, the author of Hama rules. In fact, Mr. Assad makes the Shah and Mubarak look like angels by comparison. It is also doubtful that the Shah was worse then his successors, the mullahs currently ruling Iran. For the information of Mr. Handley, in 1982, Mr. Assad surrounded the Syrian city of Hama with several hundred artillery pieces and proceeded to bombard the city at will over a 2 day period, killing an estimated 20,000 people. Unfortunately, it appears that rule by ruthless dictators is endemic in the Arab world (by the way, Saddam probably wasn't much worse then his predecessors, Nuri as Said and Abdul Kassem who were pretty ruthless fellows also).

Posted by: SLC on April 8, 2007 03:40 PM

: If you think that we're in a world where Israeli lobby activists dominate policy towards the ME just in order to encourage Arab countries to bomb Israel, what can I say other than I look forward to your book manuscript!

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that the Likudnik-oriented activists believe that our ME policy helps Israel, but it's at least possible to believe that at least some people--say some subset of longtime civil servants--responsible for setting ME policy believe our policy is helpful to us in a way that costs the Israelis. (That is, they don't support the policy to hurt the Israelis; rather, the policy requires a harm to the Israelis, but it benefits the US, and that's really all they care about.) The two groups have different beliefs about the effect of the policy. That seems like a pretty commonplace state of affairs in the world, foreign policy or not.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 03:50 PM

Shorter SLC: Finkelstein is your hero! 1938! Borderline antisemite! David Duke! Lindberg! [Repeat and remix]

Your purpose on this site seems only to remind everyone of the stupid name-calling aspects of pro-settler discourse. Are you auditioning for a job at TNR?

It would of course be much more difficult to accuse Israel of colonialism if Israel hadn't put 100,000s of settlers into the land Israel conquered in 1967.

Cue: 1938! Finkelstein! etc

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 04:00 PM

"some subset of longtime civil servants"?

SCMT: I don't know any influential approach to interpreting American politics that attributes any significant power to 'some subset of longtime civil servants'. The dominant approach is one of rather interest group politics, which points rather in a different direction.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 04:03 PM

I don't know any influential approach to interpreting American politics that attributes any significant power to 'some subset of longtime civil servants'.

That was meant as an example. I chose it because I see references to such power all the time from the Right and sometimes from the Likudniks--the CIA hates the Administration, State still has a lot of Arabists, DOJ (and specifically, Civil Rights Div.) is filled liberals, etc.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 04:13 PM

What we have witnessed since 2003 is the United States flanking Israel to the right on, amazingly enough, issues related to Israel. Im pretty certain this has no precedent in our relationship with the state. Their was a time earlier in his presidency when this was not true - Bush is not his father, of course, but neither was he an Arch-Zionist when he took office. (as some people like to pretend)

The Israelis are far more sophisticated and thoughtful than our political thinkers here in the States. They know the consequences the actions of this president have on both them and the region. They live there, unlike the scholar warriors at the AEI. There is an emerging consensus that peace talks with Syria might be a good idea - Israel is far too weak to be starting any wars right now. Obviously, this administration opposes such measures.

Also, the most extreme supporters of Israel do not need to be lobbied. They are grassroots Christian Zionists, there is a lot of them, and their views represent the most radical 5%, Kahanist wing of Jewish Zionists.

Posted by: Neal Murray on April 8, 2007 04:41 PM

Sure, you're right that there can be career bureaucrats with a different policy preference from issue-specific organised interests, but when the two clash the interest groups always win -- at least that's the general consensus on US politics. So the State Department has Arabists who watch, irritatedly, as US enables the colonisation of the West Bank, so the Council of Economic Advisors watch, irritatedly, as agricultural subsidies are handed out etc etc.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 04:41 PM

but when the two clash the interest groups always win -- at least that's the general consensus on US politics.

You have to distinguish, I think, between action and motives. If both want the same actions, even when for diametrically opposed reasons, there is no clash.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 8, 2007 04:49 PM

If I and Bill Gates want the same policies for Microsoft, there is no clash, even if we want them for different reasons. It would be wrong however to attribute equal weight to these two impulses. If we disagree, Bill Gates tends to get what he wants. (I'm not Steve Ballmer).

It's the same with career bureaucrats and US interest groups. The former aren't in a position to have a sufficient impact in any contest with the latter and so it would be wrong to grant them any sort of causal role.

Posted by: otto on April 8, 2007 05:03 PM

In regards to Neal Murray's point, I think a lot of the change in US-Israel relations has to do with the shift from Sharon to Olmert. Sharon, due to his history and political standing in Israel, was much more able to function as a partner (sometimes a dominant partner) in the US-Israel relationship than Olmert. Olmert's political standing in Israel is so weak (indeed, he may be the most unpopular democratically elected leader in the history of polling) that he is unable to exert independence from the US. It's difficult to imagine Washington blocking Sharon from the negotiating table with Syria.

Posted by: William Burns on April 8, 2007 05:15 PM

Re otto

It is rather tiresome to read Mr. ottos rants against Israel. One more time, the Arabs launched the 1967 war against Israel and lost. As a result of the Arabs losing that war, the West Bank was occupied. The situation is very simple. The Arabs must be made to pay a price for their aggression in 1967 and that price is the loss of part of the West Bank to settlements. Considering that the US occupied and annexed the territories now making up New Mexico, Arizona, and southern Nevada as a result of the 1845 Mexican War, we are in a poor position to comment on Israels' settlements and annexation of part of the West Bank.

Posted by: SLC on April 8, 2007 05:48 PM

And you, SLC, are in a poor position to comment on the tiresomeness of anyone's rants.

Posted by: William Burns on April 8, 2007 05:59 PM
As a result of the Arabs losing that war, the West Bank was occupied. The situation is very simple.

Only Israel-bashing borderline anti-semites like SLC deny that the West Bank and Gaza were given to Israel by God!

I'm sure SLC's posts make his hero David Duke very happy.

Posted by: ArgleBargle on April 8, 2007 06:25 PM

I find both SLC and Otto tiresome. Do I win some prize for moderation?

Posted by: Walt on April 8, 2007 07:18 PM

Do I win some prize for moderation?

No, but I've always been fascinated by that "pox on both their houses" liberal dynamic. Your elected representatives compete to out-do the nuttiest elements of Israeli nationalism, it has an incredibly large part in why we are having a war with Muslims in the 21'st century, and the reaction is...uncomfortableness and boredom.

Posted by: Ed Marshall on April 8, 2007 07:45 PM

While I agree with MY that the situation in the Arab world is basically unaffected by Walt and Mearsheimer, I think that the paper has had one negative effect - namely, to feed the canard in Western political circles (including, sadly, many liberal ones) that Israel really is the only problem between the West and the Muslim world.

A lot of people think that, if we somehow took Israel off the map, things like al-Qaeda would just evaporate. But they won't. And thinking that they will just causes liberal leaders to waste their energy fighting AIPAC instead of concentrating on deeper and more important issues like, say, the survival of democracy in America or American dependence on Middle Eastern oil. At least that's how I see it.

Posted by: Mr. Noah on April 8, 2007 08:11 PM
A lot of people think that, if we somehow took Israel off the map, things like al-Qaeda would just evaporate.

I can't say I've ever met a single person who thinks that. Who do you hang out with?

I guess I can imagine there are some in the conservative "realist" school who are of this mindset, but I'm having a hard time envisioning the liberals who believe it. Certainly there are people who think a serious two-state settlement (not taking Israel "off the map") would have a significant effect in drying up al-Qaeda support. But believing it would cause al-Qaeda to disappear, if we're still invading mideast countries and propping up dictatorships? No.

Posted by: ArgleBargle on April 8, 2007 08:56 PM

You can't put an absurdity like "taking Israel off the map" in a sentence and then expect to spend the rest of the sentence making plausible real-world calculations of the consequences. A better, non-straw-man proposition to consider would be "Serious momentum towards a Palestinian state and an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement would dramatically reduce the threat of radical Islamic terrorism against the US, but the Israel lobby in the US is sabotaging any effort to reach such an agreement."

The Walt and Mearsheimer paper has encouraged many on the left to feel (and to state openly) that the US's relationship with Israel is damaging our security. Some of that concern is expressed in overstated anti-Israeli ways. But the fact that it is being expressed openly is good for the US and even better for Israel, which has become locked into a destructively dependent relationship with the US.

Posted by: mattsteinglass on April 8, 2007 09:38 PM

I can't say I've ever met a single person who thinks that.

Well, Jostein Gaarder, author of Sophie's World, expressed that idea about one year ago. I've heard the idea bandied about among liberal 20-somethings as well.

Certainly there are people who think a serious two-state settlement (not taking Israel "off the map") would have a significant effect in drying up al-Qaeda support.

That, I would certainly agree with.

But believing it would cause al-Qaeda to disappear, if we're still invading mideast countries and propping up dictatorships? No.

But I think that the idea behind the Walt/Mearsheimer argument is that the U.S. is only invading countries and propping up dictatorships at the behest of the Israel Lobby. I've read bloggers who say that we went to war in Iraq, not for oil or domestic politics or chest-thumping, but at the behest of Israel. If this were the case, then severing U.S. ties with Israel and getting out of Iraq would be actions that necessarily go together, which I don't think they are.

I totally agree that resolving the Palestinian conflict should be high on our list of diplomatic priorities. But that's not what you see liberal kids on campuses protesting for...they want complete financial divestment from Israel, the end of U.S. aid to Israel, etc. And I just walk past them and wonder if they don't have anything better to protest about.

Posted by: Mr. Noah on April 8, 2007 10:10 PM

You can't put an absurdity like "taking Israel off the map" in a sentence

You need to know who you are talking to figure out exactly what "taking Israel off the map" means. Mr. Noah is *probably* a two stater, so "taking Israel off the map" almost certainly means entertaining any sort of claims made by millions of refugees in garbage dumps with deeds to houses and orchards and such who just won't be reasonable and piss off to clean toilets in Saudi Arabia or whatever.

Posted by: Ed Marshall on April 8, 2007 10:36 PM

But that's not what you see liberal kids on campuses protesting for...they want complete financial divestment from Israel, the end of U.S. aid to Israel, etc.

Oops, guessed wrong. For Mr. Noah "wiping Israel off the map" is to want the U.S. to quit shoveling the majority of our foreign aid to a country with a per capita income similar to the U.K.

Posted by: Ed Marshall on April 8, 2007 10:39 PM

claims made by millions of refugees in garbage dumps with deeds to houses and orchards and such

So we're answering the rhetorical excesses of one side with rhetorical excesses on the other? Not particularly productive.

Posted by: mattsteinglass on April 8, 2007 11:01 PM

There seemed to be a general recognition that the Arab world had fallen behind, and that it needed economic, political and religious modernization. . . .

Really, Dave? Perhaps in your circles. But we know what your circles are. They're the ones which create a large chasm between 'Israel' the US foreign policy plank and Israel the state. Vide SLC's 'The Arabs must be made to pay a price for their aggression in 1967', which is the kind of thing that raises comparisons in Godwin territory. The IDF accepts olim recruits, matey.

And SLC appears to be continuing his pastime of proving Matt's point re: kneejerk accusations of anti-Semitism, even through Passover.

Posted by: pseudonymous in nc on April 9, 2007 01:09 AM

Mr. Noah:

Well, Jostein Gaarder, author of Sophie's World, expressed that idea about one year ago.

You mean in this article? I see some somewhat gross stuff there, but not "if we somehow took Israel off the map, things like al-Qaeda would just evaporate."

But even if he had said exactly that, one Norwegian author plus some liberal 20-somethings you've met doesn't strike me as "a lot of people."

I totally agree that resolving the Palestinian conflict should be high on our list of diplomatic priorities. But that's not what you see liberal kids on campuses protesting for...they want complete financial divestment from Israel, the end of U.S. aid to Israel, etc.

And you haven't gotten the impression that liberal kids see divestment and an end to U.S. aid as a means to pressure Israel to resolve the conflict? Because if not, you really seem to be meeting an entirely different genre of liberal kids than I do.

Posted by: ArgleBargle on April 9, 2007 02:00 AM

Re ArgieBargie

Hey, my old friend ArgeiBargei is back with his nonsense. He does provide a certain levity to this blog. However, to respond to his more serious comments, he seems to feel that the answer is to apply pressure on Israel to solve the Israeli/Palestinian problem. However, he is somewhat deficient as to what it is specifically that he wants the Israeli Government to do. It would be nice is he elucidated his views on this matter.

Re pseudonymous

Mr. pseudonymous takes issue with my comment that the Arabs must pay for their aggression in 1967 by losing territory on the West Bank. Of course, he then is adamant that it was unjust for Germany to be forced to recognize the Oder/Neisse line as its eastern border as the price it had to pay for its aggression in 1939 against Poland.

Posted by: SLC on April 9, 2007 08:11 AM

This is why the founding of Israel was such a bad idea--the Jews need to pay a price for their defeat by the Romans.

Posted by: William Burns on April 9, 2007 08:37 AM

Brooks notes that it is problematic that Arab elites seem to have reverted to a "Israel is the root of all evil in the ME" framework. He noted that the M/W paper was being used as rhetorical cover for that delusional framework - as evidence that Americans would some day come around the Arab view of the world. It would have been interesting to hear Yglesias address Brooks' observation and perhaps discuss the problems of how to engage the Arab world when it retreats from the reality into its own cocooning narratives (a phenomenon that Matt is insightful at pointing out when it occurs within the Bush administration.)

Unfortunately, Matt's not interested in writing anything of actual substance or originality when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Instead its take a potshot at the silly Bobo neocon and defend Walt & Mearshimer without actually tackling the substance of their claims.

Posted by: mhp on April 9, 2007 11:12 PM

"This is why the founding of Israel was such a bad idea--the Jews need to pay a price for their defeat by the Romans."

The Jews paid that price eighteen centuries ago. After their second, unsuccessful revolt against the Romans, the Romans made them a minority in their own country, razed and re-named Jerusalem, built a temple to Jupiter where the Second Temple had stood, and renamed the land Palestine.

Anyhow, it's not as if the Arabs didn't do their best to prevent the founding of Israel; they did, and they lost. Time to build a bridge and get over it. Who else gets to ask for a mulligan after losing a war?

Posted by: Fred on April 9, 2007 11:13 PM

discuss the problems of how to engage the Arab world when it retreats from the reality into its own cocooning narratives

Well, yeah, that is an interesting and compelling issue to tackle. Brooks's observations on the conference largely rang true for me -- I know what those kinds of experiences are like, and while I would hardly pick Brooks as an ideal candidate for overcoming such polarization, and while I'm also sure Brooks brings his own ridiculous "cocooning" prejudices to the mix, I think he's probably right that it has once again become almost impossible to have reasonable conversations with many Arab intellectuals. And that the Walt/Mearsheimer paper is being used to legitimate anti-Semitic and conspiratorial views of the world, though the paper itself was not guilty of such views.

The thing is, that's the kind of subject one really ought to bring up with an actual Arab, or a Muslim at least, as part of the conversation. Also, it's probably a thirty-year kind of project that is likely to bear very modest results in any normal timeframe.

Posted by: mattsteinglass on April 10, 2007 01:06 AM

thanks all

Posted by: mırc on January 13, 2008 01:37 PM

thanks my frıends

Posted by: travesti on March 4, 2008 07:37 AM

thanks my frıends

Posted by: transseksuel on March 4, 2008 07:37 AM

chgdz.com

Posted by: firefox indir on April 1, 2008 11:57 AM

thank you

Posted by: neon on April 29, 2009 12:02 PM

thank you

Posted by: neon tabela on April 29, 2009 12:03 PM

Good comment.Thanks admin.

Posted by: coders on April 30, 2009 01:16 PM

thanks for all

Posted by: erotik shop on May 22, 2009 09:53 AM

sexli sevismeli sahnel SEXS YAPAN KADINLARI uyurken okşama videosu benimsikiş külolu kadı sikişi seks 62 tags koca yarr www.olgun kadınlarla s asian mem videoları tonbul kadın sikişi iz genç çocuk olgun kadın gelin damat seks video gnc kızlar erotık külotlu çorap seks vid sikme fotoğrafları konulu dvd pornolar real sex kadınları ikili sikişme video şişman karı seks küçük erkekler sex sit bavak arsı am sikiş sex video karısık sikişen yaşlıerkekler seks yapan evli kad hamamda seks sikiş ve popo sikme oyunu büyük poposu ve çok bü lezbiyen seks video gö erotik 4u temizlikç pornoları yaşlı kadın penis is asya erotik film porno mini seksler videolar lezbiyenler sikişiyo s tonbul kalcalı porno adult34 türkçe seks yapan unluler vıd mini etekli kadınların anamla seks YAŞLI KADINLAR SEVİŞİY türkçe sevişme sahnele sikişme ve sevişme sah porno fılmı kulotlu co kız öğretmen tarafında 3d sikişme videoları büyük yaraklı seks vid travesti gaylar sikişl lezbiyen sex parti vid pembe yatakta siliş sharo stone yarrak yalama meraklıs seksene net gta san an Full porno film zevkin tecavüzlü fikimler banyoda free porno sek www.sıcak erotik, net çocukla sex videoları arap kızları vidyo ögrenciler çılgın sex amcikların sikiş vidio SEX YAPANLAR VİDEOSU sex egitim temizlikçi sexi videol kızı uyuduktan sonra s terorist kız sikmek v seks vikipedi videolar sikişen kadınlar görün www.turbanlı seks www.seksene sex teyzesini sikenn çocuk komik porolar türkçe patlıcanı amına sokanl lezbyenler sikişiyor arap kızları seks yarrak yemek için sıra ormanda çişini yapan k göt yarrak resimleri at yarak resimleri BAĞLA SİK tender teens sexs.com kız hoca sex olgun kadın sevişmeler genç çocuk yaşlı kadın çıplak sevişen en çok sex yapan ünlül genç kızla sex yapıyo seks ilikiler pono vidi vodo sikiş dağ evinde sıcak video sexsi çoraplı sik clasic porno film izle seksi sikişen videolar gece yarısı amcık yala bir kadının banyo etme kadın adamın kucağında kadını delice sikiyorl temizlikci sik manual.sikiş gecelik altından sikiş çorapla sikişme retro amı ve yarağı olan kad avrat sex yeşil çam porno filmle şişmam kadın pornosu kadın videoları izle naylon çoraplı sex pregnant erotik doğum 200 erkek 100 kızı sik amından sikişme annesiyle seks yapan g xxl memeli olgun kadin arkadaşınının anenesin zevkten kudur izle bed erotik telefoniçin vid adam kadının dolgun gö polis sikmesi delice sikiyor amını türk evliler türk karı koca dul kadın hikayeleri s sikimeler İkimizde sevmiştik ero jıgolo arayan olgun ka penisi porno video yaşlı kadınların büyük türk liseli sex sıcak videolar seksene domalan türk yalilarin sex dede kızı sikiyor sekreterini sexsine ta eşşek siken çocuk bi yandan bakıyor bi y ohlan ananesini sikiyo klassic adult izle süper sikiyor ögretmen sexihane oyun travestiler net porno zenci yarağıyla sikiş kızlar barda bırbırler vajina yarak sokma abisiyle seks yapanlar yaşlı kadın - jigolo neden sikiş gösterilmi sexte sıcak temas amatör sekx izle porn sicak adult sikis net index tüpçü kadını sikiyor sexi aile içi hikayele doktoru sik teen solo sex sekreteri sikişi kilotlu corap soyunmas azmış kadın sik YAŞLI SEVİŞMESİ buyuk yaraklı zenci po kaynanam beni siktiriy pembe yatakta güzelce sikşişme dolgun bacaklı kadın sexsi polisi sikişi yaşlı amca sikiş izle ortam orosbuları büyük penisle anal sik gey sikşi kadın öğretmen pornosu 45lik karılar erotik ş sürtme erotik video polis durmadan çilfe y ama oparmak sokan vide denizde sevişme video denizdeporno uyuyorgen yaşlı vesexs üzerinde zıplatıyor olgun kadın küçük çocu türk lisel temizliçi anne çocuguyla sexs ya oglumla sikistik cocuk 12-13 yasında se doktor ile hasta gençler sex yapıyor gta kızları sikme şifr seks azdır beni amatör-azeri 62 evde tek olan lezbienl erotik annesi komşusuna sex yapan ka Little girl, *Seks, *Y yerli ünlülerin erotik 89 sikişme videoları şişman zenci kadın por sikişiyolardı seksen çocuk annesiyle sexs i hırçınca sesk yeni eklenen kizlik bo penis sokma vajina twi kadın domalmış erkek a kızlık bozma filim vid gta san andreas kadın animal sikiş vidioları RAHİBE SEKS FİLM hizmetçiye tecavüz tombul seks sex yapıpta bosalanlar 89 teyzem pornosu am traş olgun şişman 60 lık 70 sütyenli erotik alyssa milano pornoü kadın soyunuyor seks memeler mature anal yaslı olgun izle maturel 65 banyoda gordu siktim oturmak sikişme fılört sikiş video masturbating iple bağlı sex izle sınıfta öğretmenini si unlulerın erotık fılm HER ŞEYİ SEX YAPAN ADA %100 sevişenleri izle öğretmeniyle erotik meme uçları yaşlı kadını memelerin sıcak görüntüler derk zevce ünlüler sikiş olgun kadın mini etekl yatakta delice sevişen sexi azgın yaşlı kadın porno sesi vidioları s sevişen kişileri görün göt deliği büyük kadın free seviş büyük yarrak istiyorum çılgınca sevişenlerin sevişen erkekler video polis kadın poli komşusuna tecavüz vide klozette sevişenler orosbu neslihan amerikalı orosbu havuzda sevişenler İZL ormanda işeyen SICAK EROTZM kadın 40 erkek 20 yası sexk hikaye zorla soyma izle zorla amına kola sokan azgın YAŞLI JİGOLA ARAYAN KA animasyon yapan kızlar bekaret boz seksi sarisin videolar filimerotik anne kız erotik video genç kızlar yaşlı adam ablam pğorno lezbi görüntüleri büyükmemeler erotik bakire bozma hikayesi domalarak sex siki koyma asker erotık vıdeo şikişğüzel kızı arabanan kaçırara kadın zorla yarrak ist zevkten ölen kadın vid 89.film çiş yapan sex kadın siyah çoraplı kadın se taksici kızı sikiyor sex hamam hikayeleri hamile yarak istiyo işeyen kadınlar vidiyo öğretmen öğrencisini ö www.yeyzem.com bakire sikiş vidyosu erotik tat liseli kız sex yaslı adam cocugu sex yaslı kadınların erotı adult aile içi hikayel yaşlı kadını sevişmesi ögrenci ögretmene sex otuzbir çeken paris hilton amdan sik köylüsexi cüceler evli kadınların seks g full köpüklü sikiş uçuran sex videoları zevkcafesi pornosu seksi ve erkek kadın g kadın atı yalıyor halam erotik kadın erkek sikiş vide arkadan sikişin riskle uzun erotikfilmi sex acemi su içinde seks video sikilmiş götler videol seksi kızların sıcak s kız göğüs videoları uyurken ağzına soktu çılgınca sex sikişme v amciik traşi eden kızl meme videoları türbanlı türk pornosu dar amcı büyük penis adam kadının amından y vidio indir www.erotik.seks.com siyahzenci am zarının delinmesi amına ne soktu sıcak masturbasyon futbol sahasında sex adult firikikler tonbul zenci kadın porno erotik sesli din ne sokuyo bedava sevişme videola diskoda erotik sex kafasını amına soktu tamırcı ıle oral erotik videolar yeyzem sex izle am yalayan yakışıklı eve gelen adamla seks, uyku pornosu adam kadının amına yar agaltarak clasic sex film taksiciye siktirdim it sikşi ünlülerin sek hayvanla sikişyor en azgın erkekler orgaz site:www.seksene.net s dvd pono izle kari sweets erotik vid sevişme görüntüleri ye karma olgun yaşlı matu samanda sikiş sevişen erkek kadın vi denizde sevişme sex porno turk net sevişiyorlar erotik bayan sikmeleri nostaji porno sikş köleleri vidiolar olgun kadın erkek vidy vajina görüntüleri porno deri seksene yaşlı kadın so beyaz seksi erotik kad çiş yapan kadınlar amına sokup en büyük yarrak kaç cm sikişenler aldult sex vikipedisi izle büyük memeler seks tombul kadın porno vid izlesene zenci seks vi cep erotik porno am kadın tıraşı teknik am sikişi doktor porn sex videol teyzesini siken porno sexs fotoğrafı ızdıraplı sikiş sikişen yaşlı kadınlar amını yalatan kadınlar classic full sex film yalatma video geceyarısı sex tombul prn izle kadınların kilotlarını spiker sakso sahibe pornosu izle sexsi kadınlar vajinalı sex videoları sevişip sikişme videol en kötü acıtan sikişme en son erotik dividile kadın kokusu sex vıdıo kız gibi travestiler sınıfta lez işkece şikiş çocuklarla seks izle duvara dayayıp sikiyor güzel sex gögüsleri bü porna comm tr eve gelen tamirci kadı kendini okşuyor ellemek video kadınlara masaj yapan büyük penizli erkekler ögretmeniyle ögrencisi sikiş66.com seksi yapan genc kızla böyük.yarağım orosbu sikiş vidyolar türbanlı kadın banyoda yaşlı.karı.küçük.çocuk zor seks zor sikilen k sexsiy spor yapan kadı dul kadın şikiş video amatör sex parti video karı sikmece videosu kadınların ama sokan e amını yalatan kadın vi büyük gögüslü kıx sex www.türbanlı erotik iz sınıfta öğretmen sınıfta sevişenler vid erotik disney lezbiyen yapışma büyük gögüslerini yala MALİYE SEX VİDEOLARI BÜYÜK KIÇLI KADINLARIN popo yalatma balık etli sexsi kadın insanı çıldırtan sikiş tombul kadınla sikişme yalayıp sikişenler çıplak güneşlenenler i sikiş göm izle çıldır porn feci full dvd sexs porn amcuk dükyanı travesti pornoları gta da karı sikme kadın dölü seks yapan tombul kadı parmak yalamak video beautiful sex vidiosu +45 olgun porno izl sikişiyolar seksen kalkmış yarak resmi gerdek gecesi gelin da kırmızı kilot video bu kız adamla ne yapıy arap sikişme videoları sikişen insanlar izle dayama videoları kadın kampta kızların çocuk yaslı erotık kadın vıd rahibe seks filmi çift penisli erkek por kadının kalçası sex kıyafetle sürtünmeyle kalca adult arap kızı adult arşivi kız sikmek nasıl bir d alyssa milano lezbiyen orta tas sişman sikiş zenci olgun taş gibi g patronuyla sevişen çif büyük sik ingilizce meme seks şişman kadın porno ve sarışın lezbiyelerin s teyzesini siken çocuk tokyo erotik .com sikişme gecesi kocasıyna-sikişen-kadı sexs kız koydurma oyun kız sikşi bangbros.com kız çocuğa kendini sik şiddet kullanarak siki buyuk yarakli kadin sikiş 34 işeyerek sikişen kadın jigolo erotızm www.teyzesini siken vi sokakta sex 21kom erotik turcki sex yaşlı kadınlarla sex y cocuk olgun kadın erot amına kablo sokuyor vi arap kızı seks videosu www megahikaye olgun kadın sex yapıyo colloge sikişen mankenler izle en en en en en enerot porno izle net sex yap yaşlı kadınlarla küçük erotik videolar cennet madonnasevişme

Posted by: dizi izle on June 12, 2009 04:17 PM

Post A Comment

advertise_liberally.gif